Capitalism vs Socialism

Capitalism vs Socialism

Go

Regulated capitalism

but what if I want to go bankrupt from tripping down the stairs?

Capitalism and Bolshevism are two sides of the same kike coin.

shouldn't NatSoc be in favour of Bernie Sanders the kike

get rid of stock market and limit a companys share to percent of the market making a lot of small businesses

DELET THIS

They both define Man as an economic pawn of his masters. The greedy corrupt pigs of today are the Commissars of tomorrow.

You don't have a choice.

No Bernie Sanders is a pawn of Jewish capitalism using Socialist language to dupe stupid brainwashed mulattos into voting for him. He is in fact a MARXIST not a SOCIALIST.

why the fuck would you get rid of the stock market. how would people buy and sell shares of companies and invest in projects easily

Masons do that with their hands a lot.

Hitler was another Judeo-Masonic con man.

In their most pure forms both are utter shit.

Capitalism leads to unequal blessings

Socialism leads to shared misfortunes

Nuff said

Capitalism and socialism are not mutually exclusive concepts.

He might have been a marxist at one point but he definitely isn't now. He's a proponent of the Nordic Model, which is actually a market system but has a "progressive tax system", which basically means the more money you earn the more taxes you'll pay.

So he's not in fact a socialist either but he's the closest thing a to a socialist in US politics

this

Give it a rest

Why not both?

Whatever is more applicable for the nation's current situation

He is a cultural marxist who pushes degenerate racial philosophy. He is likely lying when describing his economic beliefs. Why listen to a Communist? Why believe one?

>"strong christian himself"
when did jesus advocate genocide?

Hitler wasn't a devout Christian though. He was actually pretty fond of Islam. And he pushed for cult of personality rather than religion in Nazi Germany. The Nazis were extremely careful in creating a Hitler that they wanted the Germans to see, which is why we don't have any recordings of him talking candidly - only of him making his speeches. The exception is of one that a Norwegian or Swedish Sound Engineer recorded of him in secret. The Nazis didn't allow any recordings of him and every photo of him was a propaganda op

Crisis are always caused by the State. The State shouldn't regulate the economy and let the market does itself.

cultural marxism is a meme and so is the problems of race mixing. The wheat and the chaff will separate from each other naturally. Tyrone Dindu isn't going to be breeding with smart intelligent white women, he's going to breed with trash. Doctor Sally McNally might marry outside her race but it will be someone on her level. We might get a large portion of coffee looking people in the future but genetics of intelligent people will never be wiped out.

the chaff of society will always drop to the ghettos and trailer parks and if they want to mix it's inconsequential.

Both are Jewish creations.
Only feudaliam can give birth to a healthy society.

you too

As a magyar shouldn't you be telling us about the benefits of semi-nomadic horsemen societies and the evils of agrarian civilization?

Freedom versus safety.

There should be no freedom, only under rule of select few can we survive. Allowing every kike to do whatever they please is what put us where we are.

you mean the unfortunate case of being the most prosperous countries in the world and living better and richer lives than anyone has in all human history?

I mean rise of degeneracy world has never seen. And no imperialism put west where it is now, not political correctness, liberalism and faggotry

Blame people rather than being responsible for yourself, which is fine if you cannot live with freedom.

There is reason why you hear everywhere make usa great again. Your freedoms will be end of us.

Capitalism and Rationalism launched the West ahead of the rest of the world before it could become imperialist.

your country is already shit specifically because it doesn't have capitalism or real democracy. your country has never been prosperous. Everywhere with free markets is doing well. Countries in Asia that abandoned feudalism for capitalism first are doing the best. China is only doing this now and they're growing fast.

Stay poor, croat

You didnt have freedom of everything back then nor modern style of "democracy". Allowing people to make up and start pushing nonsense like fluidity of gender,political correctness and other shit is pure cancer and opposite of freedom.
We need few in power who actually have skills to do shit, but no we let average retards vote for whoever they find most charismatic or hot.

Yes i see all those make america great again banners, rise of anti depressant use, obesity and other shit because people are miserable.

And so what if my country is poor? If i want rich i can freely move wherever i want thanks to higher education. But id rather have good food, great nature and chill life instead of living in some urban shithole

I actually know this one.

Luke 12:51-53 and Matthew 10:34-36

Two sides of the same shekel. They both end up at the same destination at least in present form.

moving towards freer markets has been a steady thing over time. It's been steady progress over the generations, particularly in Australia. It's a superior system of economics because people are more inclined to rise and fall on their own merits and you get rewarded for the right decisions. It's not perfect, but it's the best system we have.

fluidity of gender, political correctness and all this other cancer is like the tiniest minority of issues pushed by people that don't matter. Liberal Arts Majors aren't making decisions in the real world, they're making you and me coffees in a cafe. It doesn't fucking matter if two dudes are fucking each other or get married. It doesn't fucking matter at all. None of these people that Cred Forums puts time and effort into complaining about fucking matter in our society because they don't control anything and don't have any consequence on our lives.

People have been blaming degeneracy and decadence in society on systemic problems since ancient times, even before Rome and Greece reached their zeniths. They were fucking wrong and people complaining about them today are wrong. There's no objective truth into what's degenerate and what isn't. You are degenerate to the fucking Amish but if we all listened to that cunt you'd still be requiring a horse to pull your carriage

I never said anything against free market i think its great. Im opposed to voting and democracy. Letting average person decide on matters of state is fucking stupid. What does some hillbilly know who should run the country?

Why is there a "Socialism" sign pointing at your direction? Are you a Socialist?

needs "socialism" changed to "marxism" and a third sign pointing away from the two labeled "National Socialism"

the Anglo got it right

Are you talking about the USA? It is in the hands of the electoral college, not the people, otherwise Al Gore would have been president rather than George Bush.

The United States of America is a democratic republic, we elect officials to represent us and our interests.

Capitalism leads to transhumanism

Socialism is the only way that preserves humanity

Socialism is anti human. debate me.

I used to think democracy was bad but I've changed my mind largely after reading history, particularly after WW2.

Democracy means we can swap people out that aren't effective. It requires the population to be educated and political conscious obviously. Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia are good examples of what happens when there's no merit based system keeping things in check. Only the cruelest and most brutal rose to the top of these regimes.

I don't like the US system of politics. two-party system is flawed in my belief. I like the westminister system we have in australia and britain. everyone votes for the parties that represent them and they duke it out in politics. Many parties representing many people

So to give an example;

Labor Party is typically the biggest party, the party of the unions and used to represent blue collar workers and working class people (they're pivoting away from this now that we are having less and less blue collar jobs in society)

Liberal Party used to represent free enterprise and small business owners. They had to form coalitions with other parties like the Nationals to compete against Labor

Nationals are the party of country people. Farmers and miners etc and get 10% of the vote

1% to LDP our libertarian party

5%(?) of the vote to One Nation who are our quasi-fascist party and are anti-immigration and for protectionist econonomics

1% of the vote to Family First who are pretty much like neocon christian Republicans of the USA

10% of the vote to Greens who are are gender fluid drug legalisers

1% of the vote to Socialist Alternative who represent autistics

A system of Individual rights is objectively better than collectivism. Why? Because last I checked we are not clones.

But your party system being better is illusion you also have 2 party system, no choice at all. Voting for third party only allows one on the opposite side of spectrum to win while weakening the one closest to it.

Socialism isn't a real thing

It's Natsoc or Globalist Socialism (Communism)

That's how monopolies happen, champ.

Democracy = rule-by-media

There is still an elite class. There is still a power struggle at the top. Voting is practically just an exercise in futility, except for a few rare cases.

No my friend, what actually matters is WHO is in charge, not necessarily the system.

For example, in Nazi Germany, Hitler ruled. As a German who loved and adored his fellow Germans he fought and worked vigorously to ensure they would have a place in this world. He was a great leader

Whereas in Soviet Russia, the overwhelming majority of government officials were Jewish. As an alien out-group with no love, caring, or adoration for the people of the country, they committed great violence upon them with impunity.

In the ancient kingdoms of the Middle Ages, the kings and leaders certainly fought for their own people's interests. Because their people were their close brethren kin, of the same blood, tradition, language and fellowship.

The fantasy of limited government and "muh constitution" and democratic voting is just a fantasy. In reality whoever the consensus formed among the elites decides should be the leader becomes the leader. In many cases they aren't even making hardly any of the decisions, instead it's a powerful cabinet of political interests directing their actions

Put much better than i could thanks.
Ordinary voter is satisfied to go out and vote every 4-5 years for whatever 2 candidates someone has chosen. And he believes he has a choice and calls that democracy!

>Implying you can't have competition without money

Government set monopolies are always worse

>buzzwords

Is there a better way to use a person's innate self interest? Money is the easiest way to exchange value, it is only as evil as humans make it.

Holodomor.
Mao.
Venezuela.
Debate over.

Well you could just kill of lazy people. I think self preservation is even more potent

Holocaust (the Nazis were capitalist pigs)
Colonisation of Africa
Slave trade
America

Your move, fascist :)

>Hitler was great for the german people! other than the millions and millions of them he got killed...

yeah good work adolf

Point is he fought for germans no matter how deluded he was. Do you belive your current prime minister has best interest of her people at heart? She is just puppet spat out by party machine...

Is it me or is a Marxist's solution always to kill the undesirables or make life for them difficult enough that they kill themselves?

>the Nazis were capitalist pigs
Nazi = National SOCIALIST
>Colonisation of Africa
What the flying fuck does that have to do with the tens of millions starved to death by Mao? You're half a century out of date.
>Slave trade
Wrong country. Venezuela was a happy country sitting on top of oil reserves that's now starving to death just like every other socialist regime always does.
>America
Doing better than all the above, your point?

He took on the globalist establishment of the world and lost. One small country against the world's armies.

And he came close to pulling it off. Closer than anyone ever has who sought to challenge the power structure.
In my eyes he won glory for his people, although not victory

No, what's best for the economy is not always best for the country.

Yes it was but never lazy people only those who opposed party. As long as you were in party you could jack off whole day as long as they cared. Be good goy and you will get apartment, job and everything. We had lots of jokes here on that accountduring yugoslavia

that is retarded. Enjoy child slave labor and your local company working as a goverment.

wow, being this stupid. If companies got free reign we would get thousands of smal company goverments in our countries. Some companies allowing child slave labor and forced labor if they feel like it and so on.

Hitler liked Socialism. Hillary likes Capitalism.

DEBOUT LES DAMNÉS DE LA TERRE
DEBOUTS LE FORCATS DE LA FAIM

Nothing said Socialism like the Holacaust for the untermensch.

Calm your teenage angst, nigger.
On the other hand, wealth redistribution establishes long-term freedom by giving everyone an equal say in the government.

Oh i dont know

read my other posts... Im not against capitalism but this shit we call democracy.

Exactly. Now that's what I call leadership.

I know. I'm telling you you're wrong on both points, you silly cuck.

Democracy creates the best societies the world has ever seen, and allows us to overcome individual wants by applying the same laws to all people and allowing all people to decide how they want to be treated and treat others. You'll understand when you're 18. Even a society of sociopaths can survive in Democracy, simply because it conforms to game-theory.

Socialism helps prevent the decay of democracy, and for that reason, and only that reason, it's good. Statistically, it's beneficial to the economy in a general sense, as it industrialized Russia and quickly turned post-WWI war-torn Germany into an economic powerhouse, but that doesn't make something moral or immoral. It's the fact that it upholds the most essential of kind of freedom, the freedom to have equal vote, which makes it necessary.

Oh you silly child. What you call democracy is anything but. Do you really think its coincidence you always hear same names in burgerland politics? Is it coincidence they are related or have support from always the same families? As you can see trump and hillary are representations of common burger man. Republican and democratic parties select a candidate and you get to pick between the 2 every 5 years. Democratic right?

Trump bann henne.

Han snakket om reelle planer og retningslinjer og Clinton snakket om Trump.

Han hadde henne på tauene hele tiden. Alt hun kunne gjore var arrogant smirk mens hun var å miste. Det var pinlig for henne og for det demokratiske partiet.

Nesten alle meningsmålinger bortsett LOL (((CNN))) enig.

Trump dominert

>Oh you silly child.
You steal that line from Reddit?

>claims America isn't democracy
Did I use America as an example? No, I don't think I did.

>giving an example of something that is bad
>saying it isn't real Democracy
So basically, you agree with me?

I took burgerland example becausei doubted burger would be familiar with anything else. Also its pretty much same everywhere else, burgerland is most obvious example thats all.

>Democracy creates the best societies the world has ever seen

Democracy is the reason you're 60%

Sending sympathies to a left-wing group against whom the USA sponsored terrorism doesn't mean he's a communist.

People have been socialist and happier than when they were capitalist. It's not "anti-human."
>anti-competitive
>implying someone opens a small business because he thinks it'll make him incredibly rich
>incentivizes mediocrity
Nice meme.
>elitist
Some types are.
>contradicts modern economics
There are varying schools of socialist economics.
>achieves equality by capping success
Definitely not true.
>invasive and meddling and uses propaganda
Only some types of socialism do this.
>confrontational
Again, only some types.
>appeal to emotion and not reason
People use reasoning to decide what will have the better outcome for most people. It takes reason to interpret the moral and emotional conditions of a situation.

>the majority of government officials in the Soviet Union were Jewish
Initially, this was somewhat true. However, most of the Old Bolsheviks were dead by the late 1930s. Even before then, the majority of the Jews in the Soviet government didn't consider themselves Jewish.

/thread

There's absolutely no reason for socialism.

It's destroys economic production and makes everyone work much harder

fuck leftists

We need to end central banks to lift the country out of poverty

>Holodomor
Most socialists in the West hate Stalin and what he did.
>Mao
See above.
>Venezuela
Funny how nobody in the MSM mentions that Chavez improved living standards from 2003-2007 and that what neoliberalism did to the country in the 80s and 90s was responsible for many of the things people love to blame on socialism.

>Venezuela was a happy country sitting on top of oil reserves that's now starving to death just like every other socialist regime does
I'd hardly call multiple coup attempts and economic crises "happiness."

LA RAISON TONNE EN SON CRATERE

You said it wasn't democracy though, kek. I'm advocating for Democracy.

>It's destroys economic production and makes everyone work much harder
Those are conflicting statements, and I'm also going to need a citation. I'm also going to need you to learn to speak English, you stupid fucking leaf.