The new Testament is a Roman psyop

Christianity is nothing more than a what the Roman's used to supress the jewish revolts.

Look at the Roman civilian causualties in the start of the Kitos war, half a million roman civilians slaughtered by the jews, just over small tax hikes.

Jesus is the opposite of the warrior messiah the jews where looking for. Jesus is a cuck who wants you to never do bad things/go to war/protest the government, etc.

bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_sociopol_piso.htm

Remember that "gods" and "kings" were interchangable with one another. The virgin mary who was impregnated by "god" was mostly likely meant to imply she was fucked by Caesar.


Now that you are red pilled, stop worshipping this payops religion and go back to your roots. The kikes will shill tooth and nail to keep this and their fairy tale relevant because it makes us easier to control..

Saying that christians did x how many hundreds of years later does not gove validity.

Flavius Josephus is Arius Piso(along with many other pen names)

Also quoting from the binle does not bring it validity, nor does saying that jesus hates jews. The Romans hated jews too and this was a way to make the jewish faith split and shatter by goving them "a messiah" of peace and cuckoldry.

Other urls found in this thread:

gnosis.org/naghamm/nhl.html
youtube.com/channel/UCsypDxNONRlgMEcnR49FLFg/videos
youtube.com/watch?v=h9zOYB8kpHk
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archon_(Gnosticism)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panbabylonism
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Holy fuck all the slide threads

Noice

Virginfags be mad at this guy

Forgot pic related

This thread is for anyone becomig demoralized by all the shill posts about how Cred Forums is a christian board or some consensus cracking bullshit.

Rekt christfags

>The Romans took a subversive religion and changed it so that instead of its adherents staying in their ancestral home instead they wanted to travel and convert others to the subversive religion
Sounds reasonable.

Also if any of you fags talk about pliny the younger or tacitus, christiani and christos were neither christians you think of or jesus. They were worshipping a seperate deity altogether.

Originally it was a psyop but after nero it got out of control.

Not only that but it was much easier to subdue the masses than the roman pantheon of gods.

The romans adopted christianity because they knew they could get rich off of it.

The Catholic Church was most definitely founded by the upper Roman hierarchy to exert its influence over the growing Christian sect and parts of the empire that were being lost to christian warlords. Christ himself was at one point under consideration to be added to the pantheon.

But then it splintered off and became its own entity thriving off of feudalism. They came to represent the opposite of what the Roman's and Greeks had developed in terms of engineering, maths, science, medicine, democracy and education and the dark ages came about.

Well, this psyop eventually took over their whole empire.

Paul, who wrote most of the new testament was a Jew and a Roman citizen who had initially persecuted Christians. He was the perfect shill for this.

>Flavius Josephus
Did you know that he is one of (((them)))

wrong
dead sea scrolls

Your OP is garbage. It makes no sense. If Romans were using Christianity as a psyop why were they persecuting Christians then? The belief was so strong long before Constantine that people were dying at the hands of the state for the entertainment of the plebs and it still didnt stop it. Fuck off.

>Kitos war

>Meanwhile the Jews in the region of Cyrene had put one Andreas at their head and were destroying both the Romans and the Greeks. They would cook their flesh, make belts for themselves of their entrails, anoint themselves with their blood, and wear their skins for clothing. Many they sawed in two, from the head downwards. Others they would give to wild beasts and force still others to fight as gladiators. In all, consequently, two hundred and twenty thousand perished. In Egypt, also, they performed many similar deeds, and in Cyprus under the leadership of Artemio. There, likewise, two hundred and forty thousand perished. For this reason no Jew may set foot in that land, but even if one of them is driven upon the island by force of the wind, he is put to death. Various persons took part in subduing these Jews, one being Lusius, who was sent by Trajan.

Why didn't the Romans exterminate them? Think about how different the course of history would have been.

Jews back then were different. Most Jews went back to being Canaan pagan, weren't rabbinical jews, converted to Roman paganism, and a very few were Christian.

Rabbinical jews survived because of their insular, self segregating ways and the nature of rabbinical leaders.

Also, Phoenician/Canaanite pagan religion and dieties were historically very similar to religions of other Eurasian peoples. Some gods overlapped.

Taking Canaanite/Phoenician ideas and reformulating them was common for Indo-Europeans. Greeks and Romans adapted Punic (Phoenician/Carthaginian) ideas before Christianity.

The Roman Alphabet comes from the levant. It was adapted from Phoenicians.

It isn't the first time things have gotten out of hand when schemes of this scale are attempted.

Why are you same fagging so hard?

Was just bumping. Not like I was replying to my own arguements "yeah I agree" or /threading my own posts.

They should have but even they were not monsters like the jews.

True Christianity is called Gnosticism.

The Pagans edited the bible to try to get Christians into worshiping the Demiurge as God.

But real Christians know that God is the Father of the Universe. His son is an Aeon, not an Archon.

He is the Divine Autogenes. An Emanation of the Monad.

Their Messiah is Yahshua. It means Yah is Savior.

Yah is the Son of the Demiurge.

The old testament is literally an islamic and kikish death cult with a weak god who hungers for attention and worship for no reason and needs humans to achieve his goals because he's not powerful enough.

The God of the new testament is the real, true unknown God. The reason there was a new testament was that God finally started reaching out to free humans from THE FUCKING DEMIURGE

Where can I learn about gnosticism? What books to start reading as a beginner? I've read bits and chunks, but I want to find a church or group of gnostics that worship the true God and try to reach out to him.

Btw Yah is short for Yaldaboath, chief of the Demiurge's archons or the name of the Demiurge itself.

Gnosticism has pretty cool names and titles tho, like Pistis Sophia, etc.

I wouldn't only blame the Pagans for it. The jews are to blame as much as the Pagans.

SO, of all people professing to be Christians and worshiping in megachurches, what fraction would you say really get it? How many 'real' Christians are there?

The Source is the Nag Hammadi text that were found in clay jars.

gnosis.org/naghamm/nhl.html

If you want to listen to audio of them then start here:

youtube.com/channel/UCsypDxNONRlgMEcnR49FLFg/videos

Of Major Importance: Secret book of John, On the Origin of the World and Hypostasis of the Archons.

Very very few, because they usually get killed off:

youtube.com/watch?v=h9zOYB8kpHk

...and they don't give their money to televangelists.

>Btw Yah is short for Yaldaboath

Gnostic Ophites would say that Yah is the Son of the Demiurge.

They are all Archons. The Demiurge is the Chief Archon. The leader of the Hebdomad.

Yah is seen as Jupiter while El is seen as Saturn.

Other archons take on personifications of the Seven Heavenly Spheres.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archon_(Gnosticism)

Hoe about the old way?

Gnostics think that saying Jesus died for our Sins is Pagan nonsense.

The Original Sin goes back to the Garden of Eden and also the Fall of Mankind.

Gnostics say that Jesus tried to give us the Fruit of the Tree of Life.

Its the Grail or Eucharist.

The food of the gods was offered us at the Last Supper. The food which gives longevity.

They eat the Bread of Long Living and the Elixir of Life.

Jesus was Crucified because Yaldabaoth didnt want us to have Long Life.

It was the Pagan Romans and Jews who follow the Demiurge who killed him for that reason.

His death and resurrection is proof of his power over life and death.

>Entire old testament points to Yahshua as messiah. Down to exact time frames.
>Yahshua arrives exactly on time.
>Constantly references his father's Torah
>B-B-BUT HE IS A MONAD SON
>HE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH YAHOWAH
>NO HE'S ACTUALLY AN AEON

Don't forget that Gnosticism is essentially the Egyptian mystery school religion and Egyptians were the original enemies of God and he struck them down forever as he said he would and if you examine his prophecies you will see yahowah never, ever lies and yet...people will claim he is evil and "Yaldaboath" based on some Egyptian texts.

Never forget that Gnosticism is just a complicated way to wiggle out of the Torah and its biggest proponents are always child molesters or inciters of tremendous evil acts (rapes, sacrifices, mass deceptions, war). Look to the horrible atrocities of the many notorious freemasons or the temple of set or the order of nine angles or the vatican and you'll see that the pagan influence is 100% more related to gnosticism than anything else.

I don't understand why people try to claim Yahshua as a divine monad or whatever but sever the connection to his father, when his father correctly prophesied his coming for thousands of years.

>BUT THE DEMIURGE IS TRYIN' 2 TRIK U
No. The fallen angels are trying to trick YOU. There is no "breaking out of the matrix". They tried it at the tower of babel and they failed. There are universal rules you must consider to ensure harmony and balance. No one is going to allow a child molester to become god through knowledge.

Gnostics, when will they learn.

>Yahshua as messiah

Yahshua is Their Messiah. Their Savior is Yah.

He is the Son of the Demiurge.

If Jesus was really their king they were waiting for they would not have crucified him.

Egypt was under the rule of Marduk as Ra.

He was one of the Baal's or Bels

It means Lord or Ruler, Authority or Principality.

Your Lord is is Enlil or Yahweh.

Yes Marduk / Ra is seen as the Adversary of Enlil or Yahweh. This is true.

Its also true that his brother Hermes or Thoth taught us of the True Creator.

>If Jesus was really their king they were waiting for they would not have crucified him.

Dude. There is no "Jesus". That name is from like...1500 ad. "Jesus" is Yahshua. And yes, it means: Yah saves. So you're either talking about this figure that is representative of Yah or you're talking about someone entirely different.

He also spoke at LENGTH to the Jews that he was their king and that they would not accept him but they would accept another in his place, who came in his own name. This is the so called "13th apostle" Paul of the gentiles. Who is the number one source of confusion in the Christian religion because he claimed to speak for Yahowah yet contradicted him all over the place, especially regarding the importance of the Torah over his own invention: grace.

And for the ten thousandth time, he was not crucified by "da jooz", he was crucified by the Pharisees, who were a sect of rabbinical Jews that had completely co-opted the Jewish religion at this point, and did not want to accept Yahshua because he completely undermined their power and told no man to follow them, greatly threatening their power, esteem, and riches.

They are also the Jews who are responsible for the Talmud and the Kabbalah, the later of which is the second main source of Gnosticism. Gnosticism's two main roots are the biggest opponents to god there ever has been: The ancient Egyptians and the Pharisaic Jews.

so many misinformed idiots in this thread

Because Ancient Egyptian and Mesopotamian civilizations were started by these Anunnaki / Archons.

They are the old gods of the Pagan Pantheon.

El is their Father and Yah the Son.

A king and his heir.

Daily reminder that "flavius fabricated new testament" bullshit was created by an ortodox jew.

jews don't go by the old testament at all, that's a lie put forth by jews called "Replacement theology" in order to subvert Christianity

Exactly. The Old Testament is literally the bottom of the heap in terms of holy books by the Jews.

If you can agree that 90% of christians look to the NT for the bulk of their faith, then you must understand how 90% of jews would look to the Talmud. And that's not even mentioning the Zohar, which is like a secret decoder ring for the OT, but of mysterious origins.

Everyone knows the jews use the zohar and the talmud as their primary texts. That's why they do so much subversive shit. The old testament is still jewish though.

We have our own secret decoder ring for the OT, its called the Sumerian Tablets.

The Entire OT is based on the original stories recorded in the Sumerian tablets of the gods of Mesopotamia.

Its called Panbabylonism.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panbabylonism

>The Entire OT is based on the original stories recorded in the Sumerian tablets of the gods of Mesopotamia.
That's a big assumption. You see two similar stories from different cultures, and are assuming that the later one is based on the earlier one. What if it's rather that these are two separate accounts of the same event, but are different perspectives?

Sumerians always struck me as a strange culture. When God calls Abraham out of Ur of the Chaldees, this means he was living in southern Sumeria. The Sumerians claim that there writing systems were given to them by "gods", and they were the first culture to develop writing, so that's interesting. If we cross reference this with the book of Enoch, we see that it was fallen angels who taught men how to write, and in ancient Egypt, writing was a gift from the god Thoth. The Sumerians also claimed their gods were blonde haired and blue eyed, which is a motif repeated throughout history.

The Sumerian account has the snake as the good guy. Gnosticism has the snake as the good guy. Snakes were very important in ancient Egypt as well. My main point is, what if this Sumerian account was created by the snakes? The fallen angels? Just because it's old, doesn't mean it's not propaganda.

All the old civ's against Yahowah got blown the fuck out. Now, it's either because he's trying to prevent confusion and idolatry from spreading too quickly in this early period of man, or he is killing them because they are believers in the true god and he doesn't want anyone to know their secrets.

Given the rest of Yahowah's testimony I find it to be trustworthy, logical, and easy to understand. I also find it completely abandoned in the modern age where I see gnosticism in every single major arm of government, politics, the economy, and it is not convincing me that it is a good mentality. It is deceptive. The law of love and not oppressing is not good enough for me. Too easily manipulated. Too shortsighted.