Post dumbshit liberal sayings

Because globalism is the future and if you love nationalism so much, move to North Korea and Juche it the fuck up, you Aryan cuck.

get a real skill an you wont get replaced.

youtube.com/watch?v=qukPLN1kFws

never5get

You don't get to differentiate liberalism and multiculturalism so long as literally every single self-proclaimed leader of 'liberal' politics also pushes for diversity and multiculturalism, an more than people who oppose multiculturalism are allowed to differentiate themselves from fascists.

how has ozzy still alive and why is everyone besides him in his family so irritating

t. someone who does not have a job.

This is what H1B visas are for you literal retard, ask anyone who worked for Amazon.

>not all rectangles are squares
>but then why are most rectangles squares?
>this is proof that rectangles are squares
jesus christ just stop

>BLM is a peaceful movement, the riots dont represent us!

I see this everywhere and I want to slap people

BUT BUSH DID FLY PLANE HOLOGRAMS INTO THE TOWERS

#infowars #savage

He said it

>Bring up anything about how barbaric Islam is.

"But Christians used to wage wars and killed loads of people"

>That is centuries ago. I'm talking about today, the 21st century.

"Oh just stop being a bigot, you racist"

Shut the fuck up, nigger.

dumb bitch this is dumb fucking analogy since all you need to tell shapes apart are the physical dimensions of the shape. Most if not all liberals in power push for globalization and diversity, i beg you to find one thats in good standing with that crowd. Also rectangles and squares aren't even comparable to liberals who aren't for globalization to liberals who are for globalization since this is a distinct difference thats not inherent and their views overlap closer than others.

Also its very clearly obvious that the front-runners of a party or ideology envelop the ideals the best for their supporters so what are you getting at.

>if you can't afford to pay your employee $15 an hour, you're a bad business owner/operator

same thing with race

Our country has two major parties which both offer shitty package deals, but one has slightly less shit in it. The liberals are clustered in the Democratic party, which also pushes multiculturalism and 'tolerance' and the like.
When the garbage two-party meme ends, we can differentiate the two viewpoints. But for all intents and purposes now, support for liberalism essentially means support for the rest of their baggage. Unfortunate, but true.

whats wrong with that?

If you are so fucking mediocre that you could lose your job to someone from India then you deserve to be replaced.

Lucky that you weren't replaced earlier or not by a robot desu.

>if you lose your job to an immigrant that means you suck at your job
And these are the "power to the people!!!!" types, the ones who idolize unions.

Except that's exactly what you should be doing -- differentiating yourself from fascists. The conflation of multiculturalism and liberalism is unhealthy. It's a symptom of the polarization of American politics (well, politics in general, but particularly American politics).

Some other unrelated liberal positions include:

- support for environmental protection
- secularism
- a certain amount of gov't intervention in (but not control of) the economy
- social programs including a safety net
- decreased military spending

Notice what all of those positions have to do with immigration? Jack fuck all. It would vastly benefit you -- and all of us -- if instead of attacking "liberals" as though they were this massive homogenous entity you stood up and said, "You know what? You can be an anti-immigration social democrat, or environmentalist, etc. We can agree on this one key issue without agreeing about everything else." Instead you turn yourselves into really ugly caricatures, and do the same with your "opponents." You're not doing yourselves any favors.

Or you could just keep being vindictive.

you're extremely deluded if you think company's care about experience when profit margins have a chance to be thicker

In addition.

>whites are superior
>loses job to fucking poo in loo

top kek

>b-but they just are cheaper thats why!
Wrong. They are subjected to the same wages you are. Second, if you did your job good enough then a company wouldn't even consider replacing you even if they were cheaper.

>b-but how can I drive trucks any better than I already can
If you are doing menial labor, your life is worthless and in a few decades your job would be replaced with robots. Better gtfo now, and find a meaningful career. Consider it a mercy.

>Post dumbshit liberal sayings

OMG there's a site for this; it's called reddit!

>They're only taking the jobs no one wants
Fucking as if people only work because they want to
They're so stupid

Nationalism and traditionalism are not liberal ideas

>Who's gonna do all the jobs if we don't have illegals do them
Well maybe these companies would have to start paying a decent wage for people to do these jobs
>WE CAN'T EXPECT THEM TO TO THAT!
>lolfitefor15

>They are subjected to the same wages you are
no they are not, they're paid less because somehow labor laws dont apply here

cmon now leaf, or most likely proxy

God this one's annoying
Is what my ancestors did way fucking back somehow justification for terrorism?
They say it as if you're implying what old Christians did was okay.

>ANYONE WHO DISAGREES WITH ME IS GOING TO BE ON THE WRONG SIDE OF HISTORY!

Every 4 years these faggots tell us that the Republican nominee is a racist sexist xenophobic science hating bigot. Remember how offended they acted when Romney said he had binders full of women's names to hire from?

How is that not true?

Had you been able to justify your wage with your quality of work, you could've kept your job. Don't blame a yellow or brown man for it.

White people tried all that when they voted for Obama, all of those topics are just the anti-bush popularist shit from 2008. Look what they got for it.

Ethnic replacement and the clamping down of political correctnesd are the most important issues for white people, moreso than the environment and economy. If we don't sort it out there will be no America, just Mexico and Somalia.

Finally; you're a bernie cuck.

Gimme your money cracker. Gotta be towards the top

The garbage two-party meme is probably not going to end in our lifetimes. Our archaic 18th-century electoral system engenders it and there's too much inertia to change it any time soon.

The garbage two-party system is why I'm standing over on the other end of the aisle from you. I'd cheerfully support a near-total ban on immigration, letting just enough people in to keep the economy from tanking while being extremely selective as to who they are. I'd cheerfully support the deportation of all those who come here illegally, never mind the expense.

That being said, anthropogenic climate change is real, our government should be secular, there's no sensible reason to oppose gay marriage, the economy performs better with a certain amount of regulation, taxes on the wealthy are too low, corporations tend to do nefarious shit if you don't prevent them, the minimum wage needs to be adjusted to keep pace with inflation, we spend too much on the military, and so on.

With those positions, I'm never going to be welcome in your camp. Not ever. Not in this country.

So it'd be really, really beneficial if we stopped treating immigration and multiculturalism etc as THE DEFINING ISSUE that either makes you a liberal or conservative, so that more people in "my camp" felt comfortable saying, you know what? We really shouldn't let just anybody in.

Believe me, not all liberals are blind to the fact that many third-world immigrants come from overwhelmingly illiberal societies and do not want the kind of future that we do. We're not all blind to that. I know; I've talked to a lot of them. But you folks are making it harder for them to say that out loud, not easier.

I like how they advocate for better income equality
But if you look at wages vs. economic output, since Reaganomics, Output has increased at very high rates (until obongo of course). However, wages haven't, because of outsourcing, and illegals. If we bring back those jobs, and remove the illegal immigration problem, while also reducing taxes, economic output will increase, and so will wages.
I don't know what depressed state these fucking zombies walk around in, but it makes me so mad.

can't wait till you're laid off and your company goes offshore to get new work

I like how the "wrong side of history" meme is the secular equivalent as, "God will punish you." Yet they laugh when people say that, not realizing the irony.

The only thing that can lay me off is AI.

Shoulda got an education kid, heh

People tell me the riots are necessary because it gives the movement attention. Which is true, but it annoys me that they themselves aren't at these demonstrations when we've had a few locally and they decided it wasn't important enough to actually go, but they'll bitch about it on the internet defending it.

Those are classically liberal positions (not in the sense of 19th-century classical liberalism; in the sense that they were some of the defining issues for modern liberalism for about half a century, arguably since Roosevelt). And those are all important issues. The economy is important. Not damaging the planet is important.

Bernie Sanders and his followers do not have a monopoly on environmentalism or social democracy, nor did all those issues arise during the Bush years, although maybe it seems that way if you weren't around for and never read up on politics before 2004.

>this delusional

let me guess
CS major?

Have fun looking at jobs tomorrow. Next time try to be somewhat passionate about your job and not be a fucking lazy bum. Show a bit of drive

Other than gays (which thus far has only proven to be oppression of the church by gays as a protected class) and secularism (Hitler wanted freedom of Church and state but only of Christian religions and "religions that agree with German sensibilities,") and your lack of targeting any one racial group you realize you're basically a National Socialist, right?

Not that it's a bad thing, IMO.

Absolutely correct. Liberalism is a fucking illness and should be cleansed. They have no thoughts of their own and must be told what to do and think at all times. They'll let big daddy government make their choices for them.

canada your depravity knows no bounds, and you guys are retarded if you think companies aren't deliberately hiring illegals to do the job for pennies just to keep a dollar

If you have a job you can lose to an immigrant you should probably have shot for a better fucking job you god damned failure.

In that I support massive military spending and the nationalization of most major industries? Because I don't.

Of course what modern National Socialism would even mean is pretty unclearly-defined. It's not easy to separate it from the context of 1930s Europe, e.g. a country vaulting out of a massive depression and then pretty quickly into a massive war. The policies that would have been appropriate then certainly aren't now.

I'm an environmentalist social democrat who supports imposing limits on immigration. Let's stick to that.

...

White society is bad for society.

Whites should be more multicultural, stop trying to force assimilate new cultures into your white hemogeny society.

The crimes perpetuated by minorities in this struggling multicultural society are the result of the lingering (majority) white hemogeny that is resistant to pluralist laws which would benefit these disadvantaged minorities ... This argument is usually put forward by Jewish community groups in response to anger related to minority groups from pre 1960s European and Australian background families.

The inability of Whites to except minorities is racist. Because that old 1960 society wasn't working, you need minorities. Their food. Their culture. Your white culture won't succeed in doing anything but assimilating these smaller minorities and destroying their identity. What can you hope to achieve from an assimilated and similar goal driven society?

The great multicultural experiment.
The evil white society.

Etc etc etc.

...

All those stereotypes you've made of republicans are just msm talking points. Yes there are the anti-science religious zealots and corporatists but they're a minority. The new generation of republican voters are going to be secular isolationists with conservative values and supporters of law and order, whether that be on the streets or the financial markets.

You have to learn that even if you disagree with 90% of what the republican party says at least their base is tax paying white people like yourself. The democrat party has been hijacked by blacks and more importantly latinos who will vote for gibs and the destruction of America.

Sounds to me like you're making up excuses as to why the republicans are so bad but you're just scared of being called a racist by your friends.

...

...

...

...

...

Because sane people know that globalization is the future and the only ones who have a problem are the retarded radicals screaming "muh separatism" and "pür blüd forever don't marry that wetback".

>- support for environmental protection
We commonly point out that it's not green to replace the countryside with blocks of flats to deal with mass immigration.
>- secularism
We commonly point out that secularism is not compatible with mass muslim immigraiton.
>- a certain amount of gov't intervention in (but not control of) the economy
You see plenty of support for protectionism.
>- social programs including a safety net
As above.
>- decreased military spending
What is there to decrease exactly?

...

You have to be joking. As regards climate change and environmentalism, have you seen the Republican Party's 2016 platform? Here's a quick and easy summary of the most objectionable points, for an environmentalist.
grist.org/election-2016/11-ways-the-republican-platform-attacks-the-environment/

As regards the economy, conservatives (e.g. republicans) overwhelmingly support a more laissez-faire economy than democrats: they generally oppose social spending and regulations on business, support tax cuts for the wealthy, oppose increasing the minimum wage. I could pull up literally hundreds of examples. For most of the country, at least until quite recently, that issue was the one that most starkly differentiated the two parties -- with immigration a possible second.

Sorry, I'm not stereotyping the republican party or reacting badly to a couple fringe voices. I'm reacting badly to what republican politicians at all levels of the government, in all branches, do on a daily basis.

As far as just "being scared of being called a racist by my friends", as far as I'm concerned our society -- by which I mean western society, which, yes, was largely built by white Europeans -- is the greatest the world's ever seen. I have no reason to pretend that Islamic culture is equal to ours. It's not. That's not the same as wanting to kill every Muslim -- I don't -- but I'm not going to mince words about them either.

I'll happily say that to anybody, on here, in person. And I have. And you can take that to the bank.

Sane people are not white people then because globalization isn't aiming to include white people in this globalized future.

These radicals don't exist. There figments of your imagination planted there by those sane people your harping for.

...

Once again you are looking at radical groups' views on the future because they have the most unique voice. Part of your statement is true though; racial mixing is inevitably done by one's own will and it continues to be done. Whites and most other races will get tossed into a big melting pot.

...

>"If terrorists are a problem for you, maybe its just your turn, you know? Christians killed Muslims for thousands of years" - Obama

>Pepe is a symbol of white nationalism
Cracks me up every time.

...

I'd appreciate it if you'd define that pronoun. Who is we, exactly? Conservatives? The alt-right? Cred Forums specifically?

If you're pointing out that the principles of modern liberalism are not really compatible with allowing mass immigration, we agree! Great! That's really the point I've been trying to make, this whole time.

If you're pointing out that some conservatives share some of my views, just the way that I identify as a liberal despite opposing immigration, then yes, I'm aware. Those positions are largely at odds with the Republican Party's platform, which, at least in America, de facto makes me a liberal.

>What is there to decrease exactly?
The world's largest military budget, three to four times the size of our next rival, who we're immensely unlikely to fight any time soon? You need that kind of budget if you want to remain the global hegemon and enforce a Pax Americana. I really don't.

loser

>I listen to green day

bruh, you can't just ask someone to define their pronouns in this day and age

God damn it, I laughed.

...

...