ITT: You can completely erase all traces of one book (loosely interpreted) to improve society, what do you remove?
I'd get rid of this pseudoscience
ITT: You can completely erase all traces of one book (loosely interpreted) to improve society, what do you remove?
I'd get rid of this pseudoscience
Other urls found in this thread:
Imagine how much more progress the world would have made without religion.
Christianity, like it or not, was one of the main driving forces behind white global domination and the development of modern civilization. It's done far more good than harm in the long run. Obviously the Qur'an would be the way to go since nothing good ever came from it and has only caused headaches for white people.
DSM-5 and all similar books seems like a pretty good route.
Nah just the Torah bit of the Bible. Get rid of the Jews, or the Quaran, either works for me.
The Nuremburg Trial
>ITT: You can completely erase all traces of one book (loosely interpreted) to improve society, what do you remove?
>I'd get rid of this pseudoscience
Which would leave every other version of the DSM. Did you think this through?
This is at least interesting, since it would radically alter history.
>Imagine how much more progress the world would have made without religion.
Oops, you really think we'd have LESS religion without the Bible? You deluded idiot. Have you no idea of how many competing religions we had before Christianity?
It's far more likely some other goatherder religion like Mithraism would have replaced Christianity.
Without Christianity being formalized and dominant you wouldn't get a situation where history is stable enough to allow societal growth, and through that science, literacy and reason.
I say that as a fedora by the way.
Eliminating books rarely does anything good. It'd be more interesting to speculate in what book would have advanced us sooner.
If you want to change the direction of modern history, simply remove Das Kapital.
Pretty sure psychiatry is a well established medical field you scientologist cuckold.
I get the sentiment, but if not that one it would have been another.
>anglo defending jew science
what a surprise
The bible of course.
This is demonstrably false.
>mental disorders aren't real lol
you've never been to the psychiatry wards have you
Fahrenheit 451, just to be a prick.
wouldn't people just use the dsm4 again?
Lotta anti-psych threads popping up in the past few days. Scientology running another campaign? Let's see if your site security has changed at all in the past few years.
Is that why people with a 110 IQ are flocking to the field?
Is that why we have psychotropic use on the rise in the US?
Is that why almost 1/4 of Americans are in therapy and almost half are on medication without therapy?
>t. buttmad psychologist
>he thinks there are serious conditions in DSM-5
The 5th version is the one that went retarded with pretty much everyone having autism. The 4th version wasn't great but it was a lot better than 5.
Most Cred Forums tier answers.
>there aren't serious conditions in the DSM-5
I want you to go to a psychiatric intensive care unit in your local hospital and tell me that.
Who could be behind these posts?
>Is that why people with a 110 IQ are flocking to the field?
wow psychologists came up with a test to convince others that they're smart, very persuasive!
>Is that why we have psychotropic use on the rise in the US?
>Is that why almost 1/4 of Americans are in therapy and almost half are on medication without therapy?
are you trying to tell me these are good things?
Not a idiot commie, at least.
The Islamic bible. Any other answer is incorrect.
There are serious conditions, all the serious conditions were in the previous editions. The only additions in 5 are non-conditions and that everything is autism, as you've just demonstrated.
They also removed different types of schizophrenia to make room for more autism.
Harry potter all the way.
This only because it's be funny to see what else you guys would call them.
Assuming everything influenced by it disappears? The first Vedantic text.
they would have been called macros forever
Psychologist literally at work here. The autism issue came from a very half-assed push towards a spectrum model for a number of different disorders: whereas before mental disorders were categorized as sort of 'you haven't or you don't' with some extra mostly meaningless modifiers like 'mild, moderate or severe', there was a push to change it to a sort of 'sliding scale' so that you could say someone had some level of autistic or depressive or what have you tendencies without having to meet all the criteria.
From a certain point of view it's a useful approach, but its implementation was atrocious because the DSM committee is a bunch of fucking shills or retarded old geezers who are so set in their ways they can't comprehend change. So for one, they only did it for Autism, which is horrible because it made practicing aforementioned old geezers think 'oh, this is just a special autism thing? So that means everyone has it?' And for two, it was just horribly explained and delineated out to actual practicing psychs, both ologits and iatrists.
Tl;dr the DSM 5 was a rushed lazy hack job, you're not wrong and many in the field are frustrated with it. But that doesn't mean it's all bs.
>big rich fuckkers using government to create monopoly and steal from others
>lets create GREATEST GOVERNMENT and pray, that it will not follow his own interest
>Without Christianity being formalized and dominant you wouldn't get a situation where history is stable enough to allow societal growth,
The ruling power always looks to perpetuate the status quo. It would almost certainly have been more technologically advanced if it had not been for the atheist-and-infidel-murdering Abrahamic religions.
Talmud or Koran
The modern world is full of people with problems. You take away a formal means of helping them along and you'll just have more problems.
Take all the schizos off their meds and you'll see mass killings daily at the hands of those who have nothing to lose and can't differentiate reality from fantasy so to them you're all just ghosts trying to kill them.
It's like you don't understand what poor mental health is.
>make room for more autism
You ICD-10 ready bong?
You're right on all parts. I hate the new "spectrum" disorders for autism making almost anything autism. They even reworded gender dysphoria just for the stupid gender movement going on. I was heavily disappointed when I got my new DSM and found out that every disorder now has a spectrum for me to have to go through in order to give a diagnosis.
I'll be the first to admit you're right in this post and I'm not even butt mad at your post.
Just disappointed in my fellow academics printing this garbage.
The Koran. I'd remove all traces of the fucking Koran. It's by a fucking false prophet.
It's pretty vanilla. Nothing in there that millions of people wouldn't otherwise have discovered.
Fucking Socialists ruining my country.
Marx's Communist Manifesto is the only correct answer
Cheers, m8. 5 is ass. Though I won't miss the axises.
> German doing his level best to fuck up europe
Colour me puzzled
The works of Carl Marx.
Dianetics and related works.
Without the old testament Christianity is Cuckold; The religion.
6 better literally do most of the diagnostic work for me or there won't be a point.
>MFW I still have 4 in my office for people who get offended when they see 5
thats a good choice, hard to choose between that, the torah and Darwin's descent of man
I think you mean Das Kapital. The manifesto is a lean little call to action. Harmful, but not the thousands and thousands of pages discussing labor theory that you find in Das Kapital.
>Obviously the Qur'an
yeah but without the bible it would have never existed to begin with
the DSM-5 is just a collection tho, everything in it would still exist independently
>implying they won't just do 5-TR: Ultra Arcade Edition and add more spectrums
I hear you though. Maybe one day they'll actually pay attention to non-substance addictions too. Ha he ha ha ho.
Anything by Aristotle
Nobody likes to admit it, but most of his stuff was actually a bunch of shite. Him, Socrates and Plato in general are massively overrated, but Aristotle takes the absolute cake as far as the gap between how his philosophy is perceived and how good it actually is
They use their private property more than the state. Also capitalists force people to work for them to eat while doing no work themselves.
The earlier DSMs are better, I'm not knocking all of them, just the additions in 5 (and some in 4)
I could actually see them making that unfortunately. Printing a whole new "extended" edition just to add more autism.
I know right? I'm still waiting for them to take Nymphomania serious enough for it to make it in. Many clients I've had suffer from this condition but we can't treat them for it because it's not a substance addiction.
It's just like Chronic Abuse Dependency but doesn't get the same amount of attention. It's like they just want me to hand someone a prescription that makes their junk not work to solve all their problems.
>Speaking of meds not making junk work did you know males are more affected by psychotropics sexually than women?
The Feminine Mystique by (((Betty Friedan))) probably did more to blow up the family and by extension western civilization than any single other book
Of course if it wasn't her it would have been some other degenerate jewess, but that's true of just about every book you could suggest
(Obviously the Koran is the real answer, but thats boring)
You're a fucking imbecile. All the accomplishments of the white race can be traced back to pagan philosophers and culture. That's what the Renaissance was all about. May I remind you Christians tried to accuse many early scientists of heresy and sorcery.
This. Western Civilization would be nothing without Greek and Roman legacy
>the ruling power always looks to perpetuate the status quo
Normie B+ average college freshman parroting SJW professor tier "insight"
Psychologist here - Did you just get diagnosed with autism my friend? We get a lot of "4channer types" who are high IQ but low overall intelligence. They boast their 110-130 IQ but lack the rest of the intelligences that actually reinforce the ability of high IQ. The master children with high IQ rarely if ever get sick, socially high as in they can speak to whom they want and maneuver through society, physically fit, and much more. Often times high IQ is more a product of Asperger or functioning autism that allows patient to solve thing and store more information - but, it's almost a faux IQ. It's the disorder and not natural ability.
>all christian era accomplishments traced back to prechristian era precursors (by definition)
>and all THAT can be traced to googles in Africa so we really owe it all to them and if we had stayed with their cultural ideas we'd be even more advanced by now
>tfw fedoras adopt WE WUZ KAINGZ equivalent reasoning
>The ruling power always looks to perpetuate the status quo. It would almost certainly have been more technologically advanced if it had not been for the atheist-and-infidel-murdering Abrahamic religions.
Well this mind game is really very simple.
Take a look at the regions which had all inclusive religions:
>Mongol empire - Stole technology, biggest mass murdering empire in history, couldn't make it work and died in infighting.
>Chinese empire - At times inclusive, but strongest during the closed stages with strong states, where they also innovated the most. Gets destroyed repeatedly from infighting and lack of strong leadership, religious and ethnic conflicts.
>Africa - The poster child for why middling religions and a lack of a central authority leads nowhere. Every empire they had was an exception that temporarily unified a nation around a leader and commonly belief.
>Mesoamerica - Had large empires and technologically advanced megacities at a time their cousins to the north lived on the prarie with their inclusive nature religions. Brutal state with absolute authority and heavy religious zeal.
>It would almost certainly have been more technologically advanced if it had not been for the atheist-and-infidel-murdering Abrahamic religions.
So I simply pose to you; show us examples where this worked in history, if you're convinced it's a better option it should have succeeded and frequently so, on the marketplace of ideas.
I suggest to you, again I'm an atheist, that it's in fact the opposite.
>>all christian era accomplishments traced back to prechristian era precursors (by definition
>>and all THAT can be traced to googles in Africa
Now fuck off christcuck.
That seems a smudge anecdotal though I understand your sentiment
Don't bother though, these threads have been springing more up as of late. I suspect it's either someone who got burned by a careless iatrist or a Scientology shoot.
Jew York pharma gotta pay the bills somehow, eh? What do you mean you don't want prescription privileges goy, don't you want to prescribe more medicine?
Anyway, hang in there, I gotta run an MHA. Cheers
Removing the various forms of schizophrenia was pants on heads retarded, a disorganized schizophrenic is world's away from a paranoid schizophrenic and it also servers to further muddy the waters around schizoid personality.
I'm fear that all the ambiguity is intentional and they just don't care what harm they do in the process, lumping together people who are simply introverted and a bit reclusive or socially akward with gibberish lunatics allows them to prescribe them both expensive anti-psychotics, mood stabilizers, and so on. The APA's ties to pharmaceutical companies is hardly a secret, nor is the dirty dealing that goes on within the pharmaceutical industry. Without any real regualatory body with puplic oversite corruption within an organization with as much influence over industry practices as the APA is inevitable.
Thomas Szasz made a very good case about how Psychiatry is mostly bogus.
The Bantz is real
Nah, the DSM5 is way better than version 4. I didn't like it at first, but it allows for a lot more flexibility and personal judgement on the part of the clinician, trims down the fat list of useless disorders, and does a good job of distinguishing each one.
>but it allows for a lot more flexibility and personal judgement on the part of the clinician
Translation: I can put anyone in the loony bin and pop them full of drugs based solely on the made up disorders I invent on the spot.
jews wouldn't be as jewy if the talmund book series would be erased
I'm with the leaf.
Talmud would solve the most problems! But maybe the Torah. Takes away the Bible and Koran but the Talmud is the really evil one.
The Communist Manifesto
We must purge the read threat
I remember how fucking boring that book was in high school... had a good kek