My particular brand of trickle down wasn't tried yet!

>look guys i posted the linear scale with 200k increments again

just fucking blow your brains out

There is a reason banks don't support the mentally challenged

youtube.com/watch?v=Wi-D24oCa10

video related,

you probably look and sound like this bitch you male feminist cuck

What fucking moron labeled the y axis as savings in raw dollars, as opposed to percentage of total income saved. Under Trumps plan, I'll be bringing home an additional 12% of my gross yearly income, which will help BIG LEAGUE.

This graph would be more informative if it showed what percentage of savings people would get instead of actual numbers.

It has been tried and been pretty damn successful. Also "trickle down" economics, to my understanding, is just a strawman. I am not aware of any respectful person in the public sphere who defended "trickle down" economics using those terms. I've heard them defend small businesses against the myriad of regulations and taxes the Democrats keep pushing.

sage

Fuck why don't the blacks get to save 1.3M per person? Dis be raycist

>Y axis in increments of $200,000
Sage goes in every field

>people with bigger income, therefore bigger taxes in absolute numbers, save more money in absolute nimbers!
No fucking shit, you retard.

Speaking of, USA switching to full flat tax instead of progressive tax when?

Same, I am losing ~ 30,000$ a year in taxes.

Some pretty Trump dollars will be coming back my way.

There is no such thing as trickle down economics.

Obviously, the top 1% will invest their savings into the economy.

>companies can't have debt

did you just roll out of bed decidedly retarded

He have no big donors, rely on the money he made himself for the campaign and even made more than he spent in the process thanks to the MAGA products.

Banks had no problem supporting him before he went into politic. You know, when no one called him a racist.

And all your gun shops are out of shotguns for more than a year now. Now go pay taxes for all your poor refugees and be ready to pay more when Merkel bail the Dutch Bank.

>Wants to give tax cuts to abhorrently wealthy people
>Calls others cucks

Sounds like you're the one who like to get fucked up the ass. Just keep sucking that oligarch dick boy. I'm sure it'll trickle down eventually.

they favor her because they favor stability, certainty, and predictability.

a volitile moron in the white house will hurt the markets for everyone

isnt words that aren't threats (holocaust denial)

cause for imprisonment?

WEW. It's almost like it's percentile.

Not according to leftists like this mohammadian cuck from germoney

These communists think the rich just put their money in mattresses and hoard

epic argument xDDD

The kind that wants to hurt people feels, that the rich get more money based off of proportions.

I don't even understand how anyone could think trickle down is a good idea.

It implies that every rich corporation met with a sudden boon is automatically thinking "how can I hire more people."

I guarantee most corporations will pass any tax cut onto its officers and shareholders and that is where it will stop.

>the interests of the banks are my interests
>i'm a brave socialist who is anti-bakers and pro- fixing the system, honest

>ultra wealthy are already paying a much greater percent than everyone else
>people always accept the argument that companies pass taxes on to the consumer, but seem to get upset when anyone suggests they will reduce prices if taxes are reduced
>none of those savings are negative, and Hillary wants to increase taxes for everyone

I don't see the problem.

Someone doesn't know how to read a graph.

Slide bait thread. You know what to do lads.

this is why tax breaks don't work without regulation... repubs have it half-right

didnt get past high school, did you?

or did you take too many feminism classes in your liberal arts (((college)))?

>Banks had no problem supporting him before he went into politic. You know, when no one called him a racist.

Yes, they did. He had to seek funds overseas because nobody here would touch him.

No substance. Interesting.

Trickle down is bullshit. But you simply cannot tax the wealthy or they move. Taxes have to come from the middle class, because they are the ones who cannot move their wealth - they have to be where they can earn it. ( the poor don't have money TO tax. )

For that reason I don't mind this - as long as Trump works to build the middle class and the tax base.

>Slide bait thread. You know what to do lads.

>P-protect my comfort zone from all this information contradicting my uneducated views!

Pathetic. Cred Forums is Tumblr for right-wingers.

>let people keep more of their money
>trickle down

im telling you why the banks support her, you faggot.

it's not because she's a jew pawn or whatever, it's because you nominated a senile idiot

as you faggots like to say:

NOT. AN. ARGUMENT.

also, get a job.

>Taxes have to come from the middle class, because they are the ones who cannot move their wealth

This is indeed close to the stark reality of today, but it isn't something to be admired as the ultimate plan. You're getting taxed because others ain't.

Read the graph dumb fuck.

Slide bait thread.

>TRUMPED UP TRICKLE DOWN

Great non-argument.

How much did you pay for this slogan?

>increase the tax base

dude it's proven his plan will COST 12 trillion dollars -- he's gutting the base, not expanding it.

in contrast, Clinton actually wants to tax the middle class

Personally, I'm totally fine with a higher tax rate on the very rich (multi-millionaires). Aside from tariffs, if there's something you'd want to tax, it would be the wealthy's income, as you want them to have incentive to invest that money rather than have it pile up in their bank accounts and/or go to the government.

I believe Trump has already let slip that he'd be willing to raise taxes on the rich, probably as a form of leverage to get other things done. Although, he is not saying this now, else I'd be showing his cards when trying to negotiate with democrats in the congress.

...

There is no evidence tax cuts to to wealthy stimulate the economy. Most rich people actually put their cash in tax havens. If you tried to avoid paying taxes you'd be in prison, but affluent people are almost encouraged to tax dodge because they run the government. And you defend them like the cuck you are. Nice non rebutal btw. XDDDD

>I believe Trump has already let slip that he'd be willing to raise taxes on the rich

On the contrary.

>Speaking of, USA switching to full flat tax instead of progressive tax when?

So it becomes as successful as the other flat tax countries, like... Uhm...? Yours? :*}

Benutz doch bitte einen kanadischen Proxy wenn du so hirntote Threads & Posts machst.

Trickle down economics is the best thing for the country. Leftists will often complain about "income inequality" while completely ignoring the "standard of living inequality". Right now in large part thanks to trickle down economics, the standard of living has risen all across the board and it is much more equal then at any point in history.

Not that long ago the differences between rich and poor were insane but today now we all use the same phones and computers, and drive the same cars on the same roads, and we watch the same TV and we all eat the same food. The reason we have all of this is because rich people invested in these things to make them affordable. The type of person that can make millions of dollars are precisely the type of people that should be choosing what gets invested in and what doesn't, but when you tax them and take their money that means they have less to invest with and we see an overall drop in innovation. This is why the more socialist a country is the less advancement you'll see from them over time. Russia is stuck in the 90's and North Korea is stuck in the 50's. This is because governments are terrible at investments because they have no stake in it, if they make a good investment that's great but if they make a terrible one then it's no big deal. Nobody can the government accountable for giving millions of dollars for the solar roadways project that will go nowhere.

Keep the money in the hands of the type of people that know how to deal with it. Income mobility is also at the highest point in history. That means more rich people are becoming poor and more poor people are becoming rich. Instead of looking at inequality of income lets look at inequality of opportunity, and I'm not seeing a problem on that front. We all don't start out in the same place in life but we all have a chance to make something of ourselves.

So if they run the government, how is the government going to stop them?

>How much did you pay for this slogan?

Was Regean a protectionist?

THANKS FOR CORRECTING ALL THE RECORDS
YOU'VE REALLY MADE US THINK
KILLARY KLINTON'S KAMPAIGN IS FUCKED
SO GRAB SOME BLEACH AND DRINK!

Nope

politico.com/story/2016/05/donald-trump-tax-plan-222945

He's holding his cards tightly right now

As long as the Middle class are the beneficiaries of services, then the rich don't matter. By and for the people etc.

Protectionism of middle class labor, investment in education esp higher education, things that make the American middle class competitive and able to earn their middle class paycheck. It's a tax farm, and if you don't feed the livestock they die and you have nothing to farm. And since the livestock are running the Animal Farm, it's up to us to elect pigs that will reward good workers and not just take advantage of the old workhorses till they drop.

It improved more rapidly since switching to flat tax.

>the standard of living has risen all across the board
Your board seems to be missing 80% of the population.

It would cost 12 trillion dollars maybe in some world where the capital wouldn't simply flee.

If you want a society that supports you, you need to be valuable. If you tax the rich your society will end up catering to them at your expense.

>Trump Turns Away 12,000
And now they're Hillary voters.

>We all don't start out in the same place in life but we all have a chance to make something of ourselves.

7 out of 10 German millionaires are heirs.

>tax plan
>savings
ur joke rite?

You're confusing income with standard of living. 100 years ago the poorest people ate grain for dinners, now they eat lobster.

I have no problem with this tax break.
It sure as fuck worked in 2008 when we had one of the highest revenue from taxes ever.
It sure as fuck makes sense when the people who actually pay taxes at those rates are paying 50%.
You want equality, there's worse places to start.

That doesn't contradict what I said.

Talk to me again when your average wage reaches $1500. No non-tax haven above this value still has a flat tax, since it's insanity.

100 years ago! When you didn't have any relevant taxes, by the way.
I'm showing you a graph that compares what happened since you returned to feudal levels of inequality.

>guy makes 100 million a year
>tax decreased from 30% to 28%
>saves millions
>still pays millions

>guy makes $40,000 a yaer
>tax decreased from 20% to zero
>"only" saves $8000
>pays nothing

OMG THE SYSTEM IS RIGGED MUH TRICKLE DOWN HAHA FUCKIN STUPID CONSERVATIVES DURRR

Banks support the one that they can buy off.

That's a shit video when a huge chunk of wealth is financial instruments that normal folks shouldn't touch.

Bill Whittle is great. Do you know what video those are from?

that's why you provide investment incentives

My father as worked most of his life for rich people in home construction. He raised four kids on that money. Every purchase he has made for more than three decades has been with the money from the rich. How is that not "trickle down" economics?

Someone doesn't understand what percentage rates are it seems. I guess it shouldn't be surprising that leftists can't math. Kill yourself op.

By voting in people who actually give a shit about the poor and middle class and refuse to be influenced by bribes from lobbyists and donors. In order for politicians to run campaigns they need money. Therefore they fundraise with affluent people. This causes them to be influenced by the rich and powerful. It could easily be addressed, but until that happens they run the place. And people like you blindly support them as they run out the backdoor with all the cash. Unfortunately the presidency now contains two candidates controlled by special interests, but at least Shillary has more decent rhetoric. Trump proposals are drool and yourself stupid and would blow a massive hole in the national debt.

We're we in a depression in the 80's or something?

I don't remember things being bad at all under Reagan unless you were literally a nigger in the inner-city.

And who do you think is starting businesses? Sure as fuck isn't poor people.

But he's still in their pockets

What's your point schlomo?

"Trickle down" economics is an invention of the media. It's got no basis in any economic theory.

but user didn't you see the graph? The greedy 1% get the biggest bar! That bar should be spread out so that poor people get more than they do

le 99% fight corporate greed occupy wall street!!!
*sips starbucks*

right, the guy who took zero big donations in the primaries is totally controlled as opposed to hillary

I too like how the chart implies the (((good guys))) can reverse it by making those on the bottom save a million or two from taxes...
Welfare has a lot to grow I guess.

washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/09/28/trumps-false-claim-that-stop-and-frisk-was-not-ruled-unconstitutional/

>he thinks low income people can save $1,000,000 from tax reductions
wew

this one time taxpayer gift to billionaire is more than most serfs will ever make

subsidytracker.goodjobsfirst.org/prog.php?parent=trump-organization

this one time taxpayer gift to billionaire trump is more than most serfs will ever make

>A professed billionaire is going to represent the whims of the middle class and poor

Spare me, it doesn't take a genius to realize the beneficiaries of his proposals. I agree Shillary is controlled by special interests, but Trump is the special interest. He profits the most from his policies.

...

Who gives a fuck about guns? That doesn't even have anything to do with what he said. Germans have their own problems and faults, and they don't get solved by saying the US is worse. But somehow every German believes that kind of delusion works. Fuck you.

>successful
If your rich.

>communists
Nice meme

...

...

TRUMPED UP
TRICKLE DOWN

bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-09-26/billionaire-donors-led-by-soros-simons-favor-clinton-over-trump

>Clinton out raising Trump 20-1 among billionaires

That graph doesn't say much considering the lower brackets pay much less in the first place. So a % cut in their taxes won't be nearly as high.

The top income brackets pay something like 98% of all taxable income in this country.

>federal contracts are welfare
That's the stupidest fucking thing I've ev- oh wait it's that fucking leaf again.

Yes clearly they should back the candidate who is openly for trade wars and embargos.

I admire Reagan, but as far as his economic plan went (which I also think was fantastic, like Trumps) he was a little more globalist in nature. His motto was "the shining city on the hill", well Trumps is "the shining fortress on the hill" because he adds more beneficial perimeters.

"Trickle down" only works when the wealth does that, trickles back into the market and spurs investments while stimulating the economy, but it can't do that when it's being held and stored overseas and in foreign investments. Reagan failed to address that.

Trumps plan calls for a one time 20% repatriation of companies that hold cash in foreign reserves, which Trump will pull back into the economy. He decreases taxes and regulation, and as the final nail on the coffin, puts tariffs on companies that go overseas. This adds far more incentive to stay in the US, allowing the money to circulate here and not in another country, for all classes (which helps because the lower classes will be paying little-no income tax and will have childcare benefits, putting more capital in their bank). I think the whole thing is beautiful.

You mean with tax cuts by percentage benefit people with more money more on a nominal basis?!?!? WELL I NEVER

i think the business tax rate needs to be lowered or companies will continue to leave

but personal taxes do not need to be lowered

>gun violence hasn't been a topic since the 1980s.

you also dont have dindus

what a dishonest graph

That's why they supported her throughout the entire primaries when everyone was still saying Trump would never get the nomination right?

yeah, your probably right
we all benefit from corporate wars and reconstruction contracts in iraq and afganistan

bloomberg.com/view/articles/2013-02-20/why-should-taxpayers-give-big-banks-83-billion-a-year-

...

Do you mean to say that if you cut taxes at a uniform rate across the board, the people who pay the most in taxes get the largest reductions?

Say it ain't so, Hans.

I'd like to see that chart done by percentage rather than straight dollar amounts, a 5% cut to the top 0.1% will be a far greater amount than a 20% cut to the bottom 20%, but the 20% cut will mean a lot more benefit to the people on the bottom end than the 5% cut would mean to the top
Saged

>The bottom 40% barely pay taxes at all, so they logically would have almost nothing to be saved
>The next 40% would be less than 100k a year, and would pay about 20-30% not even registering on the chart if they saved only a few thousand a year

Where the fuck did you even find this chart?

>leftists criticizing the right for trying again something that didn't work

>trickle down
theres no such thing and republicans never advocated for it, its a shitty strawman fuck off

Why don't you show me this in percentages saved rather than dollars, faggot?
>Top 0.1% saves infinitely more money than anyone else
Of course they do. Even if they only save a fraction of a percent it's still going to be more than most people ever see in their life.

You aren't going to save 200k a year when you're making 20k, or 200k, or 400k, or even a square million. You weren't being taxed that much to begin with!

You have to make hundreds of millions a year (1%) to save that much on taxes.

You have to make multiple billions to go any fucking higher, of course when you measure like this it's going to look like shit. But a fucking 8th grade child could tell you what's wrong with this graph

...

hurr you're an idiot sheeple you should go and kill all the rich people and take their money and when no one is left the government just prints more money lol you are such a sheep i went to college my opinion matters

>estimated cost of clinton policies
$200 billion
>likely economic outcome
status quo to positive

>estimated cost of drumpf """policies"""
$5.3 TRILLION
>likely economic outcome
50% chance of recession

(*independent accounting firms)

of course, facts matter not to low-IQ dullards that support the low-IQ dullard in question

you know what the rich really need? a tax cut bigger then the cost of the wars in both iraq and afganistan

since when do MS Paint meme spammers bent on watching their nation burn, want facts?

oh,sorry my bad

>everyone still saves

who cares?

>he doesnt know how to do his own taxes

Americans generally have this amazing tendency to ignore the obvious in regards to politics.

>that graph.

Fuck me matey. Try showing the one scaled for the 150k or less crowd. (The one most people fall into)

>t. best goy on Cred Forums 2011-14

You need to step it up if you want to reclaim your title

Nice y axis. How about you show percent saved as related back to total income.

>people only making 20k won't save 200k
What a travesty.

>Not wanting to burn the place to the ground

Get fucked, senpai.

Lobster used to be served to prisoners because it was so abundant and cheap.

Poor people eat hotpockets and kraftdinner

>waah i want more money so i can upgrade my iphone and get netflix hd
>this will aid our economy

Even the words "trickle down economics" are just a liberal propaganda term.

The point isn't that if rich people get richer everyone is better off. The point is that the government doesn't have a right to just steal more money from people just because people are butthurt they are poor and make shitty decisions in their own private lives.

FTFY

He's speaking generalities.

20-30 years ago, the typical poor household had a TV maxing out at 19". Middle class had 2 TVs, one of them 23".

10 years ago, Two people in the family had cellphones -- the parents.

I don't get it. Should people who make $50,000 a year be saving $1,400,000+ per year on taxes? What's the point of this graph?

>Clinton wants to take us back to Keynesianism and 70s stagflation
Yeah nah

>edge funds

This looks much more accurate now.

What's different now?

Look at the second line of text, Hans.

and the experts said NAFTA was a good idea

and TPP

and #refugeeswelcome

and illegal immigration is ok/a good thing

so is uneducated 3rd world immigration

its like our experts are political hacks.......

>i didnt read the wsj link that actually explains what happened in reality

trickle down is just a simpilacation so even dumbass wingnuts can understand.

>the government doesn't have a right to just steal more money from people
but that's is exactly what happens, nobody chose to pay part of mcdonald or walmart employees wages

u wanna talk about guns like i aint got none? what u think i sold em all?

The problem with trickle down is it doesn't work when you factor in globalism. If the rich invest their money abroad, then we won't see the benefits of cutting their taxes.

What I find most ironic about the opponents of trickle-down is that they're the very people who one day say "politicians are corrupt squander our money away in order to make themselves rich!", and then the next day they say "only government can be trusted to run the economy!"

The doublethink is obnoxious. Politicians aren't businessmen, they're people who literally advertised themselves in order to be voted into positions of power. They're nothing other than selfish power-hungry scum-of-the-earth who shouldn't be trusted with anything. Give politicians a wad of money and you'll see a quarter of that money put to the use it was given to them for and 3/4 of it will magically disappear into strange back-room deals that never go anywhere.

But businessmen are businessmen. Let them keep more of their earnings and what are they going to do? Well, businessmen make a profit out of increased and more efficient production. Nobody gives businessmen money. Businessmen have to put out a product. With their increased funds, they will invest in better machines that make labor easier and more productive, and that increased production, they will be able to hire more workers to do more jobs.

And if they're wise businessmen, they will also realize that more work will be done if their workers are happy and content with their work. Voluntarily paying their workers adequate wages and voluntarily providing them with vacation days and healthcare ensures even more increased productivity as well as worker retention, which all leads to greater profits.

Opposition to trickle-down is literally big government propaganda.

or pay for sex changes for military personnel

or pay for a machine to be installed in the stomachs of hamplanets so they can mcgorge themselves and pump out the excess food before they digest it

What a stupid argument. False dilemmas abound.

trumps plan will cost $10trillion and hillary's plan will make 350million jobs

feel free to retweet this, I am an expert

>mfw niggers are LITERALLY given hundreds of millions in edge funds

why not have the y axis based on percentage saved and not dollars?

ill be saving money under trump, im middle class

Wow, that's like what BMW owners make in less than a month by doing nothing.

lies, damned lies, statistics

my dad owns a BMW and he doesn't make 100 million dollars a month

>"HAHA YOU Believe in reganomics !! you fucking MORON!"

And what do you believe in goosestepper? Trickle up poverty?

>But businessmen are businessmen. Let them keep more of their earnings and what are they going to do? Well, businessmen make a profit out of increased and more efficient production. Nobody gives businessmen money. Businessmen have to put out a product. With their increased funds, they will invest in better machines that make labor easier and more productive, and that increased production, they will be able to hire more workers to do more jobs.

You seem to be under the impression that the top 1% use their own personal income on their businesses.

I own a partial stake in a small business and not even I do that. My income stays with me while the company's profits go towards expenses and growth.

BMW share owners, you

I do. It's from the "Vote Pump" Firewall
youtube.com/watch?v=u24nH03NccI

It does work quite well. The government just has to be competitive when thinking about regulations or taxes. The reason why businesses are leaving is because of a ~39% federal corporate tax rate + 0-12% state and local tax rate. Meanwhile the European average is 22%. So it only makes more sense for companies to be leaving the United States to be going into countries like Mexico that are more business friendly.

I mean, it just makes sense. Just ask the question *why* are the rich investing abroad. 60 years ago, the situation was reversed. The rich were investing in the United States.

When you find out the answer to that question, lasize fair and business friendly environments start to make more sense

N-n-no! Corporations don't make rational decisions based on their own interests! They are evil and purposely try to screw us like cartoon villains!

How does it feel to know that if you have children they will grow up into a country with over 50% muslims and will get raped and murdered for it sooner or later? And if you don't have children, you are the end of your genetic lineage, you have failed at something every single one of your millions of ancestors succeeded?

Actually, I mis-remembered, the graphic in question actually belongs on this; youtube.com/watch?v=LyE0IE6EA1s

You had higher corporate tax rates and much higher top tax rates 60 years ago, dumbie.

Even under Reagan, you paid over $51.000 on an $100.000 income.

Nice casual conversation, but I would prefer to stick to the thread

Thats the dumbest fucking graph i have ever seen. Why is it not % of savings?

>The reason why businesses are leaving is because of a ~39% federal corporate tax rate + 0-12% state and local tax rate.

If your business is actually paying the full rate, you need to fire your accountant. After exemptions and credits, our businesses actually pay a lower rate than the average developed nation.

source: forbes.com/sites/taxanalysts/2015/03/25/the-truth-about-corporate-tax-rates/#18bbff8b20a5

Then why don't you answer proper responses like ?
A
FUCKING
SHILL

Well he's got to give all these big companies some incentive to keep jobs within the United States, especially if he's going to punish them for sending work abroad.

>rich pay way more in taxes than everyone else
>get to keep way more of their own money than everyone else when rates are cut

ITT: Liberals learn about ratios

It's a quote from Hillary in the debate dumbass. People get payed for that kind of shit to be made. It's marketing.

Wow, so I'll STILL be saving more with Trump than Hillary!

wtf I love Trump now!

Are we talking about people leaving or companies?

Your own picture proves you wrong. Also see for evidence that reagonomics works

Marginal effective tax rates prove you wrong
taxfoundation.org/article/us-corporate-effective-tax-rate-myth-and-fact

Are you fucking kidding me?

During every - with the exception of his last - presidency year, the top tax rates under Reagan were significantly higher than under Obama.

Did you actually read the article?

>expecting people who already pay practically no taxes to have their taxes cut by more than they pay
You realize that under Trump's tax plan, the lowest and second lowest income levels would pay 0 in taxes, right? As a percentage of taxes currently paid. the poor get MORE tax cuts than the rich under Trump's plan

...

Let's not get started on his even more retarded tariff proposals.

>my particular brand of trickle down

trickle down is capitalism

What a dishonest fucking graph

Give me the percentage of income that would be saved, not the amount in dollars ffs

>people who pay proportionally more taxes save proportionally more from tax cuts
HOLY PENIS WHAT A SCOOP

Ouch truth hurts.

How many poor people own companies, build houses, buy expensive cars, get their lawns mowed, have housekeepers??? Poor people don't create jobs... So yes in short trickle down fucking works. Get over it.

>make $20,000 a year and pay $7,000 in taxes
>taxes cut in half
>save $3,500 a year

>make $1,000,000 a year and pay $300,000 in taxes
>taxes cut by 10%
>save $30,000 a year

hmmmm really made me think

>Starts graph at 200,000$/yr

This. The graph is zoomed way the fuck out.

And with Trickle Down economics, more people are rich, so it's successful for most people.

True, but I enjoy watching people vote against their own best interests.

Nice argument

>what is a campaign staff?

German education, everyone!

>Ford Foundation

archive.is/1twlG

>only make $40K per year and won't be saving over $200K in taxes
REEEEEEEEEEEE

END IT ALL

Bretty gud analogy

I'm the poorest 99% and even I benefit from Trump's tax plan especially compared to lol-freeshit's tax plan. The fuck is OP going on about?

Does anybody here really defend the trickle down? I'm pretty conservative but I think it's a poor idea.

The graph you're showing severely misrepresents Trump's tax plan.
Keep in mind that Trump's tax plan cuts taxes for every American. Literally everyone will be paying fewer taxes (unless they've been using tax evasion techniques that Trump's plan deals with) and the most significant cut by PERCENT will be the poorest Americans who will be paying 0% income tax.

Your graph shows the numeric value of the money saved by tax cuts. Since the poor make little money to begin with, their tax cut has little impact on the total government revenue, but a significant impact on the individual who now keeps more of his money.
This poster actually shows the flaw in your graph's representation of the tax cuts.

Trump's plan isn't trickle down, but it's easy to misconstrue it as such because it involves tax cuts.

Most of these companies hold their cash offshore because they are required to do so by the specific countries investment law. He can call a repatriation but will have to deal with many treaties in place and foreign objections not so quick and easy.

Thank you for correcting the record.
>.02

>people who pay more taxes will save more if the tax rate is cut
No shit you dumb fuck

wowwwwwww

the people who own half the wealth will be able to save a whopping ONE (1) million in taxes

meanwhile the middle class and those who make barely anything will not pay taxes at ALL

the tax plan is awesome

>rich people have more money than poor people

eye opener, thanks for that redpill op

Are those like Shadow (the Hedgehog) Banks?

>implying it hasn't already worked
lmao

have oyu any FUCKING IDEA
how much easier this makes it to get a job?

I'm sure you dumb CTR welfare faggots don't care but some of us work for a living.

>raw numbers

This statistic is useless without a Lorenz Curve desu, but whatever.

36 + 60 + 90 + 2 = 100

now thats what i call trump logic

or am i retarded and these are different numbers than i think

you are retarded

You are indeed retarded.

cuz you stay well off?

>amount in $

well why didnt you buy some fucking BMW stock then? you're german i thought that was your birth certificate.