Guys, tax cuts for the rich will work this time. Trust me

In our defense, we never tried this before.

it worked last time.

So why did so many big corporations donate to the Clinton foundation/campaign?

Germany poster in charge of understanding the concept of a corporate inversion, or the difference between income tax and corporate tax rate

millionaire living in the USA =/= business operating in the USA

>jews
>russians

>tax cuts for the rich
... and the poor, and the middle-class, and the businesses... everyone, actually.

In the 50-80s, you had almost no super rich, because inheritance and personal income tax were much higher

>all families under 45k would pay no federal income tax

that tax cuts for everybody boy-o

You don't get to talk smack about economic policy eurogoogle.

Because when the tax rate was 45% in the fifties, nobody did that.

CRAWLING IN MY SKIIIN

Tax cut for businesses and fees on outsourcing business trying to import stuff to America, Abdul

>we need to let plutocrats run everything or they might not grace us with the blessing of working for them
Is there a more cucked opinion?

>implying it didn't work before
a big part of Bill's economy was the boom generated by Reaganomics.

Bill Clinton takes credit for things that happened due to someone else's policies. Meanwhile Bill's actual policy set us on a negative trend in the long term, which has been reflected by the poor direction of our country.

Also corporations all support the Clintons, don't you wonder why?
It Trump was so good for the 1% then why does the 1% hate him?

The Soviet Union was a 2nd world country by definition, my brown friend

>Move production to Mexico
>Price of items drop significantly
>Lower cost of living for everyone
>Workers are hired in transportation industry

Win/win

You are are so retarded that it pains me to know that you exist.

Wake me up when that meme actually happens

>what is quantitative easing

I'm sorry, I though my reply was to millionaires leaving the US. My point stands

>things that never happened: the post

>why does the 1% hate him?
Cause he'll cause fast more damage on business than taxes could ever do

>Things that never happened: China

I really hope he cuts welfare spending.

Not that I disagree with your pic but any highschool level cuck knows mega-anything is a abbreviated with a capital M

It's how the world actually works

To quote Shapiro: Do you work for a poor person?

It worked so well in Greece that there is no rich people there anymore to tax

:)

They are all in Panama, Ireland and UK making great deals at this moment.

yeah, actually, they didn't, because information, distribution and transportation technology wasn't sophisticated enough for it to be profitable to completely leave the country just to save on taxes.

in the year 2016, it is.

as opposed to?

>keep taxes where they are
>all corporate taxpayers move their headquarters out of the states
>now instead of receiving 30% or 15%, US govt receives 0% of tax dollars
>also employment goes down

wow very uncucked

more Millionaires because they can exploit shady business practices such as low wages for workers.

However this is not an actual good thing for the country or for the general public. Its funny how liberals do mental gymnastics to always "win"
>we hate the 1%, we are the 99%!
>encouraging business in America bad, booo hiss!
>haha stupid republicans, don't you know our policies are better at creating the 1%?
>isn't it great having a few more millionaires and the MOST PEOPLE ON FOOD STAMPS IN US HISTORY?
>we are doing so good under Democratic rule!
>down with the 1%!

that "damage" is good for the United States, and bad for globalist corporatism, which is the point.

He is unironically trying to do GOOD for the US public. Yet you retards act like making the corporations you claim to hate happy is a good thing for us.

They always do Ahmed
fuck off

>More millionaires then ever in the US under Obama
Because they got money from the government

They are state capitalists. Someone who made 1 billion dollars selling overpriced medication to the United States government didn't create wealth at all for the nation.

Not a single employee was benefited or created and not a single tax was paid since they all have move the money to accounts in Switzerland as soon as they receive the paycheck from Mr. Obongo.

Refute this. I'm waiting.

no. it doesn't. having more millionaires living in the country is hardly helpful at all. having their businesses operate here, on the other hand, is beneficial

cost of living is inflating at such an extreme rate that people think a living wage is $15 an hour.
People used to get by on under $10 an hour.

China ripping us off in trade is not a good example of what you originally said. Of course its good for countries like China. However why would any American WANT to improve China/Mexico/India instead of improving the USA?

This man get it

God bless the free market

I still answered your original question.
The wealthywant Hillary, cause she's less harmful than Trump for their business.

Different for Americans, Trump wants to bait companies that have left to come back.

Make it cheaper inside of the USA
Make it dearer to import to the USA

In theory the companies that have left, e.g Ford motors. Their accountants will do the math and find it cheaper to relocate back onto US soil.

>yes, USA. Please help us improve our country with your jobs!
fuck off.

this is reality

>Workers are hired in transportation industry
Except that market is already oversaturated.
And with shit like Uber even pedestrian transport jobs are dying off.

We have a huge number of uneducated, unskilled laborers with no labor jobs.
Boot the illegals out, bring back manufacturing, suddenly the poverty problem is gone and GIBSMEDATS programs shrink into obscurity.

He said it, CHEAP products.

>improving the USA
Taxing importations making those products expensive? The only one who will suffer is People's personal economy.

>I want pay more
Americuck don't make me laugh

>want to tax corporations
>corporations move to less taxed country to do business
>hah showed you capitalist pigs
>neet.gif

Never works

Keynesianism does though.

Cut in boom times; spend in bust times - it's the only way to keep any economy under control.

Or you could win on the promise of more gibsmedats and finance it by raising taxes on the middle class like secretary clinton proposed.

>pay less for products made in Mexico
>at the end of the day, have less purchasing power due to lowered wages and unemployment

it's a net negative for the American worker.

Well, yeah.
And if she wins it's going to be because of that.

> Keynes
> works
Look at Europe now and revel in the glory keynesianism has produced.

look at this goy

>guys we better pander to the poor and minorities, they're so popular right now

*checks flag*
oh, yeah carry on fucking self hating retard enjoy your country

>lowered wages
For cheaper products, yes.

yeah dude, just put your trust in the government and give them the fruit of your labour, they know what to do with it

>Make it dearer to import to the USA

at this moment you have to do that
Since Bill Clinton sold all factories to China USA's industry is in big trouble
If you don't do that USA will never grow more than 0.9% a year for the next 500 years

Huh?
Keynesianism was abandoned after the 1980s as leading dogma. It's not relevant today.

Merkel is following Keynes 100%.
Communists knew Keyes was the best answer for socialism in industrialized countries such as Britain and Germany.

She is following and basically all Christian-democratic parties across europe follow him.

yes... do the math and the final result is a net decrease in purchasing power, as I said. which means, overall, it has a negative effect on the American worker.

this can be demonstrated by the fact that, despite the massive increases in technological and manufacturing capabilities of the last twenty years, real household incomes (purchasing power, the amount of things one can actually buy) has decreased in America over the last 16 years.

again. net negative effect on the American worker

>there are people who are actually incapable of realizing the benefits of tax cuts
>those are the exact same people who think that privatizing rich people's money is justified and healthy for the economy in any way

Yeah, nice plan lads. Lets steal capital from the efficient entities controlling it and give it to some retarded minorities who are incapable of making investment decisions. Down with the evil fat capitalists that are stealing from us by us willingly giving it to them!

Americans don't give a fuck about you that's what you don't seem to understand. We don't give a fuck if there is a god damn tortilla famine in your shit country. It is never good for us when an American job is transferred to Mexico to be made with 3rd world quality. You are a god damn leech, a parasite, a sponge. Why should we care? Would it make you happy if the majority of Mexican manufacturing was moved into America? Who cares if you can't buy your Tecate and flour for the week right? Those jobs are in GOOD HANDS AMIGO.

>Merkel is following Keynes 100%.
She's practicing a balanced budget and austerity. The opposite of Keynes.

Wrong. It's still very much en vogue. State spending is at an all time high, while the economic crisis that started in 2008 is still in full swing. The problem is of course that the money is running out. This is why the central banks have resorted to printing money. Also, keynsiansim can only work if governments accumulate reserves during boomtimes. However, they never do that, hence keynesianism doesn't work.

It worked with regan...

You're confusing fiscal and monetary policy. QE is monetary policy, not state spending.

Keynesianism would've meant deficit spending. Germany is reducing it's deficit currently and advising everyone to do so.

>austerity
>by spending 50 billion euros on refugee

what else has she done? cut pensions? Well she will increase military spending next year

Is that seriously what they teach you in Merkan schools?

We have a a balanced budget for the first time since dunno when.

QE enables state spending. The central bank gives that money to banks, who, lacking investment opportunities during a crisis, buy state bonds because those are (under normal circumstances) safe assets. However, since the state wastes the money and doesn't get the taxes to pay it back, the bonds loose value over time because of inflation. Inflation eliminates savings of the lower classes, who either spend it or loose it. In conclusion, the way it is practiced now, the state and institutions are being kept afloat by pressing out the lower tiers of society. If you are careful, you can pick it up in the inequality stats that socialists wave around when they argue for more redistribution/state spending.

She raised taxes and took loans at the DB for favors.

how do you balance a budget increasing military spending and giving free 2000 euro paycheck to millions of refugees?

You can't be so naive to believe in that. She is a keynesian 100%.

The austerity propaganda is heavy used here in Brazil "we will balance the budget" and 4 years later you discover they spend 200% more than what they reported.

Dude wheres my party?

The Bernie people left when you used enhanced endorsement techniques.

Central bank money is handed to private banks. They decide what to do with it.

Inflation is on an all time low since WW2.

>in the year 2016, it is.

Nice conjecture

Can anyone name a large company that actually pays what is supposed to in corporate taxes currently?

Thank you for educating me a about my country.

Our government debt is dropping as we speak.
And no one gets €2.000 paychecks, by the way. In Bavaria, refugees get mostly foodstuffs and shelter, little cash.

I want to make Drumpf look like that irl. Give me 10 mins w/ this pig alone and I will do everyone on the right side of history that favour.

its the
>we cant cut taxes cause that would mean people that pay more taxes get more money back
meme

>guys a 65% income tax isn't robbery

>And no one gets €2.000 paychecks

They get more than that since the paycheck(~870 euro) does not include housing and food
sputniknews.com/europe/20150925/1027544472/germany-pay-refugees-monthly.html

Actually if you think about electric bill, groceries, etc they are given more than 2 euros a month. That 800 euro paycheck is just for them to spend on whatever they want.

>The report said that 25.7 billion euros ($29.07 billion) would be needed for jobless payments, rent subsidies and other benefits for recognized asylum applicants by the end of 2020.
reuters.com/article/us-europe-migrants-germany-costs-idUSKCN0Y50DY

>Thank you for educating me a about my country.
You're welcome.

...