Pretend you're just the average voter.
When someone writes an article that says "Donald Trump tries to distract from Machado sex tape accusations", what does that make you think?
Personally, I think they're trying to slander Trump in every way possible.
how is this slander?
>porn video is now considered a sex tape.
Oy very vey, how slutsaming of them.
You're missing the point.
the point is that you are an idiot who doesn't know what slander means
Personally, my interpretation of the sentence, if I were to ignore all other information that I'm aware of, is "Donald Trump attempts to distract people from the sex tape in which he and Ms. Housekeeping are recorded having sex.
Yes, it seems slanderous to me.
But if he fucked her that is a positive, not a negative thing. That is how we see things in America.
I didn't say it weas slander, you fucking retard.. You can attempt to slander without actually slandering someone. Hillary always tries to appropriate sexism and racism to Trump, and this is one of them. It's not slander, but she is distorting his character, which could arguably be a form of slander.
To normal people who don't know who the fuck Donald Trump is, like the guy I got the story from, who said "You support this guy?". From the naked eye, it looks as though people distort his character.
>tries to distract from Machado sex tape accusations
What it makes me think is whatever paper I'm reading is fucking retarded thinking that "Machado sex tape accusations" are worth talking about and that any topic of conversation could possibly be less valuable in order to be a distraction.
I do see how it could be misleading to imply The Don made a sex tape to stupid people though.
Slander is spoken, retard
>I didn't say it was slander
>Personally, I think they're trying to slander Trump in every way possible.
step it up leaf
A libel.. pretty much the same thing. Defamation regardless.
>false accusations
But they're true.
Hillary does try to slander him all the time.. Spoken.. Wasn't lying. I've seen it on the debate. I've seen it on the news.
I didn't actually say the article was slander, that'd be libeling in this case, which is sort of what I'm talking about as well.
My point is that this could be construed as "Don has a sex tape, and wants to distract people from it"
I get your point, OP. Yes, we are a nation of retards so normies will see Trump and SEX TAPE. They word it like that on purpose.
Nothing because the common media has lost almost all its credibility
Pretty sure it's only slander if it's untrue.
A man trying to become President of the United States of America is getting into a pissing contest with a former Miss Universe competition winner. This should be beneath him, but he's doing it anyway.
And that's why he's a terrible Presidential candidate.
>having the energy to fight back on every major attack they throw at you makes you a "terrible" candidate
Your bias is showing. He fights off all attacks because he has pride. People don't see it as a weakness. They are just told it is one and nod in agreement because they're stupid. As soon as someone tells them it's not a weakness, they again nod in agreement. It's not that Trump is doing anything wrong, just that the media is the sole voice that many idiots out there listen to and make their decisions based on. The rest of us are awoken or in the process of becoming so.
It is beneath the office of the President of the United States to engage in a pissing contest like that. He might have pride, but he apparently completely lacks dignity.
Wheres the fucking link to the tape you worthless niggerlovers
What about the sex tape? Does it exist? Link? I really want to see. I like a Latina with a bit of extra padding.
Also, OP doesn't know the precise meaning of the word "slander." The journalist in question is trying to give a negative impression of Trump, obviously, but slander is not the right word for this.
>"corrects" the record
>false accusations
>your dick is divine!
It will just disappoint you.
youporn.com
Its just scenes from a reality show in a nightcam
Thanks, user, but that's very disappointing. They're just fooling around in a room full of people. Surely this isn't what Trump meant when he referred to a sex tape, is it?
Attention. Cred Forums is under intense observation. Evasive action required.
It is. If its any consolation it was called a sex tape 20 years ago, before we made sluts celebrities.
Its sounds like trump is defending machado in that headline
>trump tries to distract people from believing machado has a sex tape
>FALSE ACCUSATIONS
i can watch that porn vid of her on redtube right now
>Machado sex tap
The what now?
>It is beneath the office of the President of the United States
>beneath the office of the President
>2016
lol
but Hillary Clinton digging up this old whore and using her to attack Trump isn't right?
>Personally, I think they're trying to slander Trump in every way possible.
Wow OP, you're pretty redpilled
I didn't see this before but now... I don't know anymore man
What other insights can you provide for us?
because Trump isn't trying to distract from it at all, yet the media states it as if it were fact
this is slander, plain and simple
>Woman has sex
>Is on video,ie taped, having said sexual encounter
>Said film is not a sex tape
This is some hardcore mental illness type delusion on the part of HillShills
please don't link that fat fuck with Rei Ayanami, Thank you.
He could be in Brazzers jizzing on black chicks for all I care.
Just build the fucking wall and pass tariffs on cunts shortchanging US workers and I'm satisfied.
better?
yeah, thank you.
Construct a sentence to make it seem it's trumps tape.
It's referring to the reality show.
This bitch has a porno AND a sex tape.
>pretend you're an average voter
I'd look it up on youporn and be disappointed that he's in it for 5 seconds, opens bottle of champaign outside fully clothed, and leaves
it probably wont influence my decision
thats why he keeps saying acid washed the emails
Headline:
"Dumbfuck Trump doesn't even know that bleachbit just deletes data it doesn't actually destroy the subpoenaed evidence with acid"
Can you really trust a guy who doesn't understand how to properly destroy evidence to be president? Drumpf = stumped
Lacking dignity would be never standing up for yourself i.e. what clinton does.
>"Mrs. Clinton you're a lying liar pantsonfire fuckface"
>"Well, that's your opinion"
What porno? Link me.
And no. Not the Angel Dark video
She has a sex tape. She got caught getting dicked live on a reality show.
That counts as sex on tape... this sex tape.
It's not Hillary cares who she hangs around with. She hangs out with Kim K, renown for sucking black cock on camera.
HILLARY'S PARKINSON'S TREMORS CAUGHT ON CAMERA
>youtube.com
Just fucking Google it, you lazy sub-70 IQ nigger, Jesus Christ.
TRUMP HAD SEX WITH THAT MACHADO WOMAN?
That's what an average voter would think if they just glanced at that headline.
That's the sex tape. He said she has porno too. That's what I was asking for. Learn to read fucking retard
There is a porno actress that looks like her but thats it.
Does it matter? Not only is she getting dicked on cam, she also has an interview on CNN where she admits she was a getaway driver for a murder.
Oh, but her actual porno isn't 100% publicly available, DRUMPF IS SUCH A LIAR!
I figured he was talking about the Angel Dark video. Why are idiots still trying to say it's her?
I asked my gramps what he thinks and he said it looks like desperate slander.
I'm a Trump supporter. Just wanted to see her getting pumped properly. Not some grainy night vision shit under the fucking covers.
And yeah I saw that CNN clip. Trump should've brought that up instead of some rump she had on reality TV
>Pretend you're just the average voter.
I literally don't know anything about any current events please fuck my face.