You can only pst if your country had civil war

As topic says, you can only post if your caountry had civil war where the wrong people were weed out and beaten.

>inb sweden posts


en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finnish_Civil_War


youtube.com/watch?v=gnmGW-sIkmg

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North-West_Rebellion
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albanian_civil_war_of_1997
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wars_of_the_Three_Kingdoms
youtube.com/watch?v=exnwTWfFRM8
youtube.com/watch?v=AnNWtDRrHrQ
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_negro
youtube.com/watch?v=Ox6c-8EF858
youtube.com/watch?v=SoENzQ-rOd0
youtube.com/watch?v=VvDBKPADpT8
youtube.com/watch?v=5OKdbc0DYpM
youtube.com/watch?v=nyrjvrT2F-s
youtube.com/watch?v=8B4K79oAnJQ
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_in_Great_Britain
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Game
fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sortovuodet
m.youtube.com/watch?v=p5mmFPyDK_8
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eureka_Rebellion
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgian_Civil_War
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_war_era_in_Norway
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithuanian_Civil_War_(1381–84)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rum_Rebellion
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Civil_War
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hungarian_Revolution_of_1848
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wars_of_the_Roses
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_Civil_War
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Troubles
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_Civil_War
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

:' )

...

which country has not had least had one?

hey

...

Sup bitches

aw I wish I can put on the flip flag. Fuck allah-believers, fuck commies and fuck chinese loyalists

we lost ours

What would happen in a modern Canadian civil war?

this.

If you attack yourself, you win... wait...

We believe in God, stop with that fag shit where you think we say Allah all the time

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North-West_Rebellion
What about this?

it will be a word war, everyone is a pussy

...

We had three.

Only pussy countries have less than 2

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albanian_civil_war_of_1997

Weeding them out and just beating them wasn't enough

that's a pretty pathetic civil war. That was more of a forced power dispute as the vast majority of the country opposed the socialists. Come back when its a 50-50 split

we won the first one, which is why it's called the revolutionary war

does fighting natives count

You may only post in this thread if your cicvil war(s) have a cool name
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wars_of_the_Three_Kingdoms

oh hey

The whole country's schtick is civil war. Our Phillipine History basically revolves around it.

Then all the other countries would get involved, the US especially. We will NOT allow our main Syrup importers to get ganked. Although, as a Mainer, it would give us a niche use as a syrup creator. Now I don't know if I want this.

The War of Northern Aggression sounds pretty cool

We wasted 600k of our people so we could have a google president white genocide us.

Gay as fuck.

Indeed, i think its time to nuke the fucking Helsinki area, inside Kehä 3 road. And Turku too, since its the asshole of finland.

Mikä on suomen vittumaisin koirarotu?
Turun murre.

Ever heard of Riel, retard?

Look! Look! Leaves are about to fight!

Do the unification wars count?

pst

I wouldnt gloat, you lost your civil wars too.

>tfw had the opposite of a civil war
>upper and lower Canada decided to become one country
>no blood was shed
>everyone got along for the next hundred years

Anyone else seen this movie? The whole thing is available on youtube, apparently:

youtube.com/watch?v=exnwTWfFRM8

It's about America in the current year, had the South won the Civil War. it's hilarious.

Eureka motherfucking Stockade

the west would break off, Trudeau would act smug about it but eastern canada wouldn't have the money to do anything about it.

...

Old as hell.

Gods and Generals is best Civil War movie

is it Man in the High Castle levels of stupid?

uhhhh.... it's not *really* a "Civil War movie."

>sorry
>sorry
>sorry
>sorry
>sorry

i dunno.... i haven't seen that.

but i think the vast majority of Cred Forumstards would find C.S.A. HILARIOUS.

youtube.com/watch?v=exnwTWfFRM8

....and the whole thing's on youtube, too

Sorta. It's reasonably well done, in the style of old history channel shows.

I know, I've seen it before, I was speaking about normal movies.

>6,000,000 dead adjusted for population

That stat always gives me the chills. And there are monkeys talking about ayo reparayshuns to this day.

"Our" is a nebulous concept. Where the 48ers and the irish conscripts really ours?

a country cant lose a civil war moron

For real? Not gettysburg?

We had a civil war, but the cucks won.

>

Muslim terror cells from Ontario would storm critical infrastructure and police stations. Trudeau would refuse to speak publicly for at least a day, before going on TV and urging restraint. Five days later, the military would be deployed, but at that point it would difficult to take back the urban enclaves without intense fighting. Chemicals from industry would be seized and used by the Muslims to threaten the water supply of wider urban areas and farmland, effectively forcing the government into a "temporary" truce.

With the borders closed and all civilian flights grounded, the population would be helpless and trapped in the cities. Aid would be parachuted in by the military. The Muslims would then make a push for CF bases, which they would have a roughly 0% chance of actually taking, although they might be able to successfully besiege some. At this point, the US would likely intervene and it would be over in a day or two.

ayyyyyyyy

Yes, it goes into a lot more of the war, and gives good performances from both sides. Much like Gettysburg, but covers so much more of the war. Jackson is pretty based.

youtube.com/watch?v=AnNWtDRrHrQ

Checking in. South totally should have won that shit

I'll check it out. I remember it getting panned pretty hard but I dont really care about the (((critics))). It would be nice to see a depiction of more of the war. I loved how gettysburg portrayed both sides too. I don't think a movie like that is possible in the current climate. They just have to demonize the CSA

Not as hard as you did, you mean?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_negro

:DD :DDDD

I wonder where are all the swedish posters? :DD :DDDDD
:DDDD

>5:30 AM in Sweden right now.

They're probably all waking up and preparing to clean up all the bull semen from the long hard night.

It's in the same style as Gettysburg, longs speeches and such, it did get panned though. Jackson and Lee are major characters, with Jackson being the main. It's dramatic as fuck, dunno, I liked it more than Gettysburg, maybe it's the more southern focus.

It's technically the prequel for Gettysburg, both are based on the views from the Shaara novels, which are great books on the war.

I liked Gods and Generals, but I found it to have subtle implications of lesbian miscegenation. There's a scene when a black slave dresses up in her master's fancy attire in her absence. God only knows why. I think I know. I think it's because wearing the clothes of an attractive member of the same sex is utterly thrilling.

Tomorrow we decide if we end ours :'>

(actually we will end just one the longest of many conflicts going on)

Lieber tod als rot

youtube.com/watch?v=Ox6c-8EF858
youtube.com/watch?v=SoENzQ-rOd0
youtube.com/watch?v=VvDBKPADpT8

Yeah user I'm sold. Just saw the scene where Lee turns down Lincoln's offer. Duvall is perfect for the role. I didnt even know it was the same director or in the same lineage as gettysburg. Imma get comfy with some bourbon and watch tomorrow night. Also added the books to my list. Not that I'll probably ever get to them.

wat

We have been in a constant civil war since ever, shit is dank

This is our true flag. We have to return it.

They just wanted to reunite with Russia. The fuck is wrong with you finland

Hasnt it been pretty low intensity though? Forgive my ignorance but before I heard about the peace agreement the other day I thought FARC was basically irrelevant. No offense or anything, I just havent heard anything about FARC in a long time.

The issue here is it implied slavery would exist forever. Very much like in the civil rights movement, they would have large movements which would proactivate to abolish slavery. The CSA would have to eventually illegalize it as more and more people become more progressive thanks to the progressive movement of the late 1800s and early 1900s.

The CSA today will probably just be the conservative dream land. God, family, country. The USA and the CSA will not be too different from eachother as both culturally change.

TD:LR movie is still funny

>whats wrong with you
asks USA. :DD :DDDD

youtube.com/watch?v=5OKdbc0DYpM

ahem

>Not joining the Krasnaya Armiya.
Finland why?

Does killing the maoris and abbos count?

Because it was more fun to mock Russias nationalist songs.

youtube.com/watch?v=nyrjvrT2F-s

It's like vietnam, the goverment and the people don't want the army to end the job, things are calmed, but it get out of control some years ago

More relaxing to hearing Touhou songs

youtube.com/watch?v=8B4K79oAnJQ

Is it sad that Philippines and Mexico are the only two successful Spanish colonies?

>Sorry
>Eh?
>Sorry
>Eh?
>Sorry
>Eh?
>Sorry
>Eh?
>Sorry
>Eh?

Fuckin emus

Philippines i don't know, but they are in Asia So they must have more success than us.

But México?.México is the country that allows the cartels grown stronger, the goverment let the cartels do whatever they want, and do nothing to stop the drug bussiness between usa and México. And of course that affects our international image and our own countries

Less talk, more pictures of metropolitan lefties on the edges of mass graves.

Pic related.

We had a bunch of miners with guns who were pissed off about taxes hole themselves up in a fort for a while, does that count?

In this picture, the one allready laying there is not dead, but passed out from vodka.

Honestly thr whole hemisphere needs to clean up its act. I aint even mad about the drugs. If there wasnt a demand it wouldnt be the problem. Fucking degenerates in this country are the root of the problem. That said, I still dont want to be the dumping ground for degenerate mexicans. We need the wall.

pic related

Mate.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_in_Great_Britain

How the fuck was it the wrong people who won your civil war?

No. Thats like a typical day in Best Virginia circa 1915.

kek

Perhaps, another picture with leftists forcibly coerced to drink themselves until passing out.

They also had a cool revolutionary flag that bogans treat the same way as Southerners treat the Confederate flag.

That flags p. dope. Could use more red, but that's cool. I dont think the miners in west virginia had a flag. Just red bandannas.

Wat? OP just said it, lefties lost the civil war and good ammount of POWs went "missing".

I think we won that one. There was an international intervention, but that failed.

And the left losing is somehow a bad thing?

Pic from from one of the bigger cities, note the progressive actions towards gender equality.

>where the wrong people were weed out and beaten.

but the wrong side won in my country.

Imperial Russia was based as fuck. Almost erased the ottomans but France and Britain just HAD to be cucks.

Finland, quite surely Sweden then also, being part of Soviet Union would have been very unhealthy for Danish independece, wouldn't you agree?

Pic: More old school progressives failing on "bringing the revolution".

It's weird to think of these scenes happening in a clean, prosperous, industrial society. It's understandable in Russia or Ukraine, but Finland? It's surreal. Unless Finland was a poor country at the time but I don't think so.

So explain to me what
>the wrong people were weed out and beaten
fucking meant?

Do OP dream of being part of a soviet union, do you?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Game

Fucking hang you retarded kike shill.

>still pushing separation of whites in the US

the south got cucked though?

nvm I'm tired, maybe I just don't grasp the intricacies of the English language at the moment but all I read is OP saying "I wish we had been part of the SU"

>you just lost The Game

The US Civil War was a terrible mistake. Had the South simply used legislative power to keep slavery going in just the slave states, the conflict could have been avoided. Most people didn't want war. The border states would most likely have been persuaded by rhetoric to defend the institution legally.

You can only post in this thread if you country is relevant enough for its Civil War to be "The Civil War"

weedman AI executing all the conservative voters

Theyd stand in the parking lot of princess tire screaming "buddy" at eachother

Also when did they get independence from england, was it through a war? That would have been a civil war.

>You will never march to the sea with Sherman.

kike for supporting my home?
>>still pushing separation of whites in the US

was brexit separating whites in Europe? the US federal government was taking advantage of the south. we we're right to break off, and we STILL should. the northeast and the west coast are lliberal shitholes. we'd be guaranteed a right wing government.

we we're outnumbered more than 3 to 1 with shitty supplies and still took less casualties. we didnt get "cucked" faggot

There was LOTS of hate and anger towards the "reds" and their supporters. After gaining hard sought and waited independence, communits in Finland wanted to merge with Russia.

To make matters worse the leftist took the initiative in war and as they gained territory, commited the first systematic acts of terror with summary executions of law enforcers, officials and "wealthy" citizens.

The "whites" avenged tenfold.

Tl;dr: Don't slaughter civilians and POWs unless you are sure to win.

Pic related.

>wanting to cause a war that will kill more whites than anyone else because you refuse to win in a legal way

Fucking kike.

Commies acted like niggers and were put down like rapid dogs.
>Before war staged violent riots and illegal strikes
>Started rebellion immediately after losing in elections
>Murdered landowners, priests and even workers who refused to join their cause
>Stole everything that they could
>Collaborated with russians

>>Collaborated with russians
Why do I get the distinct feeling this was the breaking point

only one civil war?
pleb

The map of finnish civil war may seem like whites had the upper hand but red territory had more than 50% of population and 90% of industry

>the US federal government was taking advantage of the south

Bullshit. South Carolina seceeded days after Lincoln was elected. He did nothing, literally nothing, and the South left.

Instead of saying "Well, we lost the election so we have to make a stand on Capitol Hill" they left. That 2% of the population who owned slaves marshalled forth legions of white yeoman farmers to fight and die for their right to own niggers.

Of course not. Does exterminating animals count as a war?

They sound like the scum of the earth. Not even in a starving society, like in many places where Marxism took hold, but in a civilized and rich Scandinavian country. It's chilling to think it could happen in the first world.

Were they Jewish-led like in Russia?

To be honest, I think OP left a word out of a critical sentence. It was a little weird at first but I assume I understood the original thought.

you're either a pretty good shill or the dumbest stormfront yank ive ever come across. the north had far more jewish support and you're the ones that wanted to force the south to release millions of uneducated blacks to fuck us over.

modern america is a bastion for jews and easily the biggest contributor to their influence. yet im the kike for wanting my part of the country to break free from this shit? fuck off dumbass.

>war that will kill more whites

if they're kike enabling whites that refuse to let everyone else live outside their indoctrination then its justified.

>Finnland
>White

Oh look its the country that is only 60 % white due to sandniggers being counted as white talking shite again about "whiteness"

i wish the whites also won the russian civil war, jews fucked russia making it impossible to recover

a few idiots getting mad at the Government doesn't count as a civil war

>South Carolina seceeded days after Lincoln was elected. He did nothing, literally nothing, and the South left.

taking advantage of the south didnt start with Lincoln. it had been going on for decades. thats why we had such a strong political divide geographically to begin with.

the election was just the last hope of getting some influence back into the federal government for their support. didnt happen, so they decided to have their own to properly represent them.

> to fight and die for their right to own niggers.

not why we fought. you just blew up your own point logically speaking. farmers arent willing to die for 2% of the pop that owned slaves.

Can you imagine the reprisals? It would make the Pinochet era look like a walk in the park.

>Bronstein's naked body hung upside down in public
>Jew named decades before Hitler
>Cold War avoided
>Russians enjoying an American level of wealth today

commies have a bizzare reverse eugenics method, killing every smart and honorable person, leaving only most base scum and thieves, and russia got hit the hardest, adding that it ALREADY was a shithole before gommie revolution the glorious effect is plainly seen now.

The "old folk" told stories of young hot heads from the big cities coming with even bigger ideals, just wrecking places and killing folk without trial or evidence. Justification for death was based on occupation, word of mouth or even clothing.

No Jews, just mind full of proganda and the example of the glorious revolution next door in Moscow.

>Farmers aren't willing to die for 2% of the pop that owned slaves

lol yeah they were, poor southern whites have a tendency to support Rich White Men at the expense of their own livelihood, not sure why.

Finland had like couple hundred kikes at the time and most of them were likely on the commie hitlist for being middle-class. But if you count outside influence, the reds were urged to take arms by russian revolutionary leaders and you know who they were.

Whelp.
I guess "heart" and "passion" wasn't enough to win a war in the "people's revolution". :^)

>not sure why

you're admitting thats stupid reasoning. ever think maybe thats because its wrong?

they're fighting for independence from a place that doesnt represent them. pretty simple, and not much different from the american revolution.

(hurrr that rebellion was great cuz independence from shitty british! but south trying to do the same? t-treason! )

Yes.

>taking advantage of the south

While it was true that the North had failed in it's constitutional duty to return escaped chattle; that isn't a good enough reason to leave.

>the election was just the last hope of getting some influence back into the federal government for their support.

They had almost half the house! They were not powerless babes in the woods.

>not why we fought.
Fair enough.

In the Second World War, plenty of Russians fought the Germans. Some fought because of their love of communism or Stalin. But many fought because Russia was under attack and they had to answer the call. Their intent was to defend, not to establish the power that would dominate Eastern Europe for the next 40 years.

As important as it is to know what one is fighting for, it is good to have an idea whom one is fighting for.

Regardless of your feelings about it, a Confederate victory would have meant the continuation of the right of Southerners to own slaves. In practice this was the right of the elite, far out of the reach of the common man.

Tbh, I don't think finns then hated russians at all, it was more of an anxious feeling of things to come. Communist russia didn't lift a finger to help finnish commies in the war compared to the german material support dor the whites.

The hate towards the "reds" was purely for being assholes.
Imagine a hill-billy state in the US where suddenly SJWs raid a gun store and start executing all the "bad" people and the officials for good measure.
News spreads and they boast on how they will "cleanse" the state house-by-house.

That might make a few non-city folk upset.

i dont think emus thought of strayans as animals m8, invaders yes, but animals?

It's not like any new tariffs or taxes were introduced before secession. They were butt hurt that the North got a candidate elected, and were mad that new states that would be added to the union would likely be free states and not slave states. If you think the south seceding from the union is the same as the American Revolution you need to go back and read a history book.

>Communist russia didn't lift a finger to help finnish commies in the war compared to the german material support dor the whites.
Reds had access to military-grade weapons of garrisons and shipped more during war. Russian communists also sent support troops throughout the war.

When jaegers arrived to aid whites it was almost mid-war and when germans arrived, Tampere was already taken and reds were fleeing towards Russia.

>While it was true that the North had failed in it's constitutional duty to return escaped chattle; that isn't a good enough reason to leave

slavery was just one issue. tariffs we're pissing off farmers. forcing heavy taxes on exported goods to force them to sell north.
states rights being undermined by the federal government.

before the civil war people used to identify with their state not america as a whole. seems weird now because the civil war changed all of that.

the cultural divide alone is enough to leave imho.

>They had almost half the house! They were not powerless babes in the woods.

true, they weren't powerless in the federal gov. but why constantly fight over passing bills with the north when you can simply part ways and both get the laws you want?

>Regardless of your feelings about it, a Confederate victory would have meant the continuation of the right of Southerners to own slaves. In practice this was the right of the elite, far out of the reach of the common man.

this argument is overdone. slavery was a matter of time before being abolished. even in the south. they hadnt industrialized to the extent of the north. abolishing slavery would be a crushing blow to the economy while they were still agricultural. (and it was)

>Their intent was to defend, not to establish the power that would dominate Eastern Europe for the next 40 years.
Well it is kinda useful for avoding being invaded again

>It's not like any new tariffs or taxes were introduced before secession.

they had been there for years. just because lincoln didnt do it doesnt mean anything.

>They were butt hurt that the North got a candidate elected
pissed off that they wouldnt be represented by the new president. are you going to be saying the same if trump loses?
>and were mad that new states that would be added to the union would likely be free states and not slave states

>muh slavery is da only reason argument
the average southerner didnt give a shit about the new states being added. the average northerner didnt either for that matter. its a factor but a massively exaggerated one by your ((( public school )))

>If you think the south seceding from the union is the same as the American Revolution you need to go back and read a history book.

to be specific i said similar. and instead of giving a non argument like
>hurr read history book
how about you elaborate right here?

It was a 50-50 split. Where do you get your "facts"?

Finland isn't Scandinavian and back then our country wasn't even wealthy.

>I don't think finns then hated russians at all
Are you a putinbot or did you just sleep during history classes?
fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sortovuodet

OH I WISH I WAS IN THE LAND OF COTTON

The problem with division is that it might not end with just the South leaving, or even the South staying intact. One need only look at the history of South and Central America to see that once the original bonds are broken it's harder to keep people together.

As for the tariffs, while onerous for the South, they were absolutely essential to the industrialization of the North. Southern cotton fueled the textile mills more than any other raw material. Without cotton, industrialization in the North would have been far slower.

When I look at the economic and demographic history, it seems like the South took most of the risks while the North reaped most of the benefits. In the space of a roughly a generation the Southerners built their cotton kingdom. But they did so at great cost, first through Indian wars and relocations. Then, they lived in many cases outnumbered by their slaves. While it wasn't as bad as when the Spartan were outnumbered by their slaves (4:1 ratio), it was still a lifestyle where they had to constantly be on guard toward escapees and troublemakers.

With the hindsight of history, I think we can agree that it would have been better if abolition had been accomplished by sending the slaves back to Africa. Immediate poverty would have been the result for both the South and the North. But in the long run I think having a fully white South would have been better. Forcing integration was likely the cruelest thing the North ever did. Twice.

We have had 2 civil wars, when the Quebecois got pissed off and when the metis got pissed off

Alberta, Saskatchewan and Quebec trying to secede.

Does this include wiping out the natives?

>The problem with division is that it might not end with just the South leaving, or even the South staying intact

an overlooked point by secessionists yeah. i dont think the confederacy would have lasted a long time. but i dont see this as a problem. even if they balkanized after the war each state could become prosperous on its own later on. its not like trade was going to stop.

i agree with the rest of what you said. pretty good summation.

May I remind that the entire concept of "Reds" or "Lefties" was not even invented back then.

We had tons of population without proper legal status of their land and possessions, a remnant from feudal time during the Swedish and Russian rule.

That population organized themselves and started demanding reform, which escalated to civil war when revolution in Russia removed them as our overlord.

Not saying that red leaders weren't total scumbags though, those who managed to escape to Bolschevik Russia continued their "murder is a solution for all disputes" policy.

Meanwhile the Whites here just wanted revenge and elimination of all "workers", seen as untermench. It took some time explaining to them that the industry will stop if you kill all the workers. Thanks UK.

>We had tons of population without proper legal status of their land and possessions
>Implying that renting land gives you the right of ownership.

>implying that some Swedish/Russian "ownership" of our holy clay would count at all

War is nothing to be proud of. Given our current capitalist society war is inevitable but that doesn't mean you guys should praise it.

>Implying that private ownership is dependent on ruling state.
Fucking commie

>Implying that "Here, take this foreign land as a prize for licking my Royal butt" would be justified
Butthurt Finland-Swede detected, KYS

>Alberta starts civil war and declares independence
>BC joins the fight
>guerilla war with hunting rifles
>maple syrup rations

A leaf can dream.

>ITT dixiefags crying
Stay buttmad traitors

>hillbillies support a slave trade that's run by Jews
>get BTFO and southern women become slaves to BNC (Big Northern Cock)


Post things that trigger dixiecucks

m.youtube.com/watch?v=p5mmFPyDK_8

I have pure finnish family line that has owned land for 500 years. Land that they cultivated themselves from the wilderness.

>Be you
>Be born in the familyline of losers
>No-one has never achieved anything in life
>"hurrdurr I have right to steal the fruits of generations of hard labour from other finns because muh communism"

Weve had some serious civil wars mate. Didnt they teach you abiut the war of the roses?

>BC joins the fight

id be for this so long as we had 100% guarantees we would not be stabbed in the back afterwards

bonus points if we have a military alliance after the war

...

Still, it was Lenin who gave us our independence. No denying of that.

>watching plants grow is being successful

lmao pekka

Go back to Moscow.

Why did the communists never consider the option of colonizing wilderness for themselves? There are farms in the far north of Norway due to the coastal climate, so it can't have been impossible to turn some unused Finnish taiga into productive cropland.

kek

It is though desu senpai

Commies BTFO

>Lenin does not control Russia but band of commie bandits fighting against government
>Gives paper that says Finland is independent
>Lenin gains controls over large part of Russia >Lenin sends troops and supplies to forces that oppose finnish indepence
hurrdurr Lenin gave indepence to Finland. t.commies

>watching plants grow is being successful
Says sossurotta who has never worked on his life and does not know shit about farmwork. Work camps for work avoiding people like you were the only good thing in Soviet union.

>Also when did they get independence from england, was it through a war? That would have been a civil war.
Nah, we just asked politely.

It is easier to steal already existing infra than build it yourself. See Zimbawne for understanding commie mentality.

It wasn't that Lenin didn't want to support the Finnish Reds. Look at all the dumbass foreign adventures he had in Ukraine and co. which lead to utter disasters. At the time Soviet Russia was just far too weak and in too vulnerable position to put any serious pressure on Finnish Whites. If you actually read up on the history of the Bolshevist movement (I recommend Stalin: Paradoxes of Power), you'll know that the Soviets were dancing on the edge of a knife during the interwar period, and often only dumb luck or their political enemies being even more incompetent saved them from the gallows.

Giving those fucking googles rights was a mistake.

Triggered much?
You know why Finland was for many years and still is, I guess considered wonderful country? Mostly due to leftists policies and Social Democrats being i power for many years.
It is also interesting to note that ever since your petboy Cuckoomus get to play in politics after death of Kekkonen our debt has only risen and risen, outsourcing jobs has gone wild , unemployment is now through the roof due to their wonderfull employment policies and darkies just keep coming because gotta get dem cheap workers.

Is it really a civil war if one of the sides is actively striving to break away rather than decide the policies of a common nation??
Isn't it rather a war of independence then?

You are aware you guys are losing a war against a plant?

nuclear power =/= litter

what a fucking dumb picture. You could have presented whatever their rhetoric is, and refuted it, but you immediately retreated fallacy instead.

Or you did not make the pic and are just parroting, and you're too stupid to understand how shallow and vapid it is.

Yeah but why would they start a war over it? I smell bullshit. My guess is that all the land in Finland was already privately owned. The far north wasn't exactly devoid of people either, there were indigenous tribes who used the area for reindeer herding. Now, I admit I have no idea of whether their tenancy of that land had legal recognition or not, but I'm willing to bet it did. The communists' grievances about having no land for themselves must have been legitimate, but their mistake was turning inwards to their own nation to try to steal it, instead of a traditional enemy like Sweden.

How recent a civil war are we talking?

My country was founded at the end of a civil war that led to a separation. But after that the core province kept the others in check until Hitler invaded and the east defected before we capitulated 2 hours later.

Thanks for proving my point.

>Canada
>1982 was the year Canada became independent

Didn't the Social Democrats get much more rights to continue operating in white controlled parts of Finland than red controlled parts of FInland.

does this count?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eureka_Rebellion

At that time he did not have legitimacy to give it. Therefore his recognition was nothing but an empty phrase. Commie claim about Lenin giving indepence is a lie. If some beggar claims that he gave you million euros, does that make it true?

I guess we usually had the right people winning our -civil- wars, so yay for us.

wasn't your nation under fascist control that fucked over its people?

Nice memes gold-jew

...

Pretty sure that was way after
Also, it pretty much elevated the economy of Greece in a fast pace so it wasn't that bad but it did fuck over Cyprus

10/10

hello mongol give back our clay

i was about to KMS but this made me kek and give life another try.

Memes

nice fucking work

...

>Yeah but why would they start a war over it?
They did not. It was the factory workers and other urban people who started it.
There was a large population of rent farmers who have sort of a meme status about being the thing about the civil war. In truth they were divided pretty much 50/50 so it would be equally right to claim that they fought for the whites. Among those that did join the reds however, many had this "I'm gonna murder landlord and live in his house" mentality that made them scum.

also why are mongols so bad at english? Evry nordic country exept you shits are great at english.

What if Yankees knew our flags

τραβα ρουφα τη ψωλη του Χιτλερ γαμημενε γερμανοτσολια γαμω τη φαρα σου.

...

10/10

>please be a troll post
the revolutionary war was not a civil war

It's interesting when you look at the wiki, pretty much all the "whites" commanders have swedish/german sounding names, while pretty much all the "red" commanders have finnish sounding names.

tfw your grandfather killed commie scum feels good man

bruh

>Norway becomes Christian
>immediately go and die for Israel
>give away your ships and treasure
>come home
>die
>110 years of civil war

England has had 8.

we sure did

He looks at the map and thinks population is equally divided all across Finland

swedes is master race. When you arrive at the nordic countries you are already mining gold but then sweden is like a platinium/dimond the stone that shines brightest a beacon of perfection

>210 post in
>you done fucked up.

Fennoswedes are our own native jews.
Consisting of families, some dating back to days when we were under swedish rule. Days when we were untermensch and servant while they were the bättre folk (you can probably guess what that means)

True, only you're letting in too many niggers to shit on your shining beacon.

Whatup

It was a civil war in country called Great Britain.

HOLY FUCK I DIDN'T KNOW THEY HAD CLAWS

Arent many Fenno Swedes assimilated Finns?

Yeah that's what I was thinking. Not trying to insult, but whenever I read something about finnish history, many of the prominent finns have very non-finnish sounding names. Just think Mannerheim.

It's like you guys were never really independent and were mostly ruled ancestors of the swedish monarchs up until recent times.

Would kind of piss me off to be honest. For example in Czech someone who was actually a descendant of the austrian monarchs was trying to be a president few years ago. Many people hated him just because "fucking austrian monarch".

they can rip ur stomach open if you get kicked, that's why you have to be careful of the Red ones

Yes, english cant deliver as well as our proud nordic languages.
i meant that the people who were wrong, were beaten and the people who were right, won. got it?

Finland was pretty fucking poor back then. Workers' rights were then so I understand why so many factory workers joined the rebellion. The red leaders scumbags but I can't fault their troops for wanting a better life for themselves

Joining the club

>Workers' rights were shit

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgian_Civil_War

Is Gori Safe?

What? there are 28 medical states and six recreational states and six more deciding in november.

Do the middle ages count?

You can only post if your civil war lasted longer than a houndred years. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_war_era_in_Norway

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithuanian_Civil_War_(1381–84)

Best guy ever led this

reeeeee dishonest map. Alaska was russian territory

Yes, it is

I might have started a thread civil war

...

Good. Gotta protect that last Stalin Statue in the world,

Well, our country is not yet even 100 years old.

No we didn't, Republicans won, just like Trump will win and fix America.

My bad, i forgot my country won independence IN Great Britain. Colonial America was never called Great Britain, it was always just the colonies, but who cares debating this is useless
>America needed to beat the north, but south lost, now we have cuckery

>Losing 360,222 men to a few plantation owners with outdated guns
How?

de Burge Civil War
Nine Years War
Confederate Wars
Cromwellian Conquest
Williamite War
United Irishmen Rebellion
Irish Civil War
The Troubles

George B. McClellan.

kek republicans were the radical liberals of the 1860s

99% of southerners didn't even own slaves but they gladly died for the rich plantation owners

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rum_Rebellion
matee

Most of them live either in capitol area or east coast north of Turku. Some speak finnish but there are people who dont speak word of finnish and stick in their own enclaves with their own kind.

They tried Finland. you don't have to rub it in. they were only trying to reunite a country that had no right to exist. like the Baltic states

since the dawn of time serbs have been killing other serbs
we ARE made for civil wars

That war was pretty bloody for a small country. Mannerheim wanted to intervene in Russia too but he was disallowed. Dumb move, in hindsight.

The Great Emu War where we wed out the hu- emus

muh eureka stockade

Baltics can actually run a country so i think they got the right of staying independent of Russia.

**FLASHBACKS INTENSIFIES**

Wish you had those borders still

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Civil_War

>its Vytautas betrays Teutonic Order twice episode

...

Wasn't the war with the U.S Kind of a civil war?

>post by Finn
>Sweden Sweden Sweden
lel

Also Swedes don't even know about whatever it is you linked


No one gives a shit about your "history"

Still unsure if I'm glad the parliamentarians won...

...

It's not their history though.

"Finland" is a new age hippy concept.

What could have been...

The only actual "civil wars" we had was basically us switching sides to the winner during the Napoleonic period, first overthrowing the Prince of Orange in favor of the French and establishing the Batavian Republic and later overthrowing the French after they were losing and reinstating the Prince of Orange's heir(as king that time), basically avoiding alot of death and destruction that was present during the Napoleonic Wars.

We could have been a Republic.

The eternal Dutchman.

>tfw you could've had a greater empire than us if you'd picked India over your precious spices

>mfw we can't even get the simple provisions of the Firewall Letter passed let alone a decent independence movement.

>tfw finngolians don't know about Nils Dacke

All the Maori tribes were constantly warring with each other before civilization came here so does that count?

BEST CIVIL WAR COMING THROUGH!

SERBIAN ARTILLERY IS LED BY GOD

i knew swedes come to cry to this thread. :D

Malmö no-go-zone doesnt count as civil war yet. :D D:DD :DDD

Woo

Banter

It's pretty much just niggers throwing nades at other niggers anyways. Animals can't have civil wars.

>Nah, we just asked politely
amerifag btfo

Didn't realise how much we actually fought ourselves, wew

Mannerheim was born swedish and served 30 years in the russian empires army, despite this he is by far one of the greatest finnish men to have ever lived.

this shits pretty cool looking at his history. private meeting with the tsar and traveling across the empire into china.

he saw so much change in that short period of time

Does a revolution count?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hungarian_Revolution_of_1848

Or how we are glorifying a bunch of liberal traitors who rose against the rightful king today.

>civil war where the wrong people were weed out and beaten

Not yours.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wars_of_the_Roses
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_Civil_War
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Troubles

If you're interested in him, read his daily orders from the war, especially 34.

But he talked about the French revolution, not fall of Napoleon Bonarpte.

>this is what republicucks believe

The French Revolution was the lowest point in European history until commies rose to power in Russia.

Maybe the aristocrats and Church shouldn't have blocked the reforms the king wanted then?

It depends on what side wins. If we'd lost the war of 1775, it would probably have been recorded as just a failed, civil uprising, or "civil war". Essentially, it's the body from which one side is forcibly seceding thar qualifies "civil", as it constitutes a breakaway from that national community. If it's successful, the winner records the event as "revolutionary", and that history largely overtakes the subdued's attempts to historically downplay it. The British aren't really taught the global significance of the American Revolutionary War (to say nothing of the PRESENT), but it marked the decline of colonialism (not imperialism), bankrupted the French monarchy, and prepared a theater for the French Revolution.

Reporting
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_Civil_War

>le funny ows maimay xD lol upvoet plz
They died because they were violent, and itching to kill Yankees; others believed it was a righteous cause. Read the accounts.

Reporting in :^)

...

WW II was a complete clusterfuck here

Soon to be civil war?