breitbart.com
How fucking stupid is SHILLARY?
>However, a look back at Hillary Clinton's tax returns from 2015 (here), proudly displayed by the campaign proving she has nothing to hide - shows something awkward on page 17...
>While not on the scale of Trump's business "operating loss", Hillary Clinton - like many 'wealthy' individuals is taking advantage of a legal scheme to use historical losses to avoid paying current taxes.
Link to her tax returns:
Bump
yeah but did She denigrate the mother of a returned US serviceman? Is She a mean racist?
>mean
fuck off reddit
Bump
She's clever; she knows she can do exactly what Trump has done and the media won't care; they'll only care about what Trump has done.
But she did insult an entire voting block that she critically needs behind their backs
she lied to the mother of a dead one.
and yes she is a mean racist, she just knows the new terms to not sound racist.
Bumping
>She's clever; she knows she can do exactly what Trump has done and the media won't care; they'll only care about what Trump has done.
I don't think that makes her clever, it just means the deck is stacked against the people. Not that I'm saying anything that isn't well-known or hasn't been said a 1000 times before.
Bump
Bumped
except we dont know the justification for Trump's write off because it was not included in the leak. We just know he wrote down close to a billion dollars. How could we possibly know that hillary used the same technique, rule or whatever?
They all do it, user.
Literally everyone in congress can get these charges.
Your entire political system is corrupt beyond saving.
No candidate will ever be any good for you. Not Trump and certainly not Clinton.
Why aren't we fighting this with Clinton foundation stuff? She's gained taxpayers for years and squirrelled it for herself.
Cause her tax returns clearly show her doing the same exact thing he did. She's a fucking hypocrite CTR/SA
>exact same thing
But we dont fucking know the justification for the billion dollar write down so how could we know its the exact same thing?
...
I hope someone makes a big deal out of the Clinton Foundation stealing money from Haiti as a followup.
Seems like this tax thing may be the perfect window to get some of the Clinton financial dealings to stick in the public's mind.
She tried to ruin the lives of people her husband raped. Seems like it would be a big no no to progressives.
The Wall Street Journal describes the loophole that Trump used:
>The tax treatment of losses, bound to become a subject of national debate, is a typically noncontroversial feature of the income-tax system. The government doesn’t pay net refunds when business owners lose money, but it lets taxpayers use those losses to smooth their tax payments as they make money. That reflects the fact that “the natural business cycle of a taxpayer may exceed 12 months,” according to a congressional report.
>Typically, for federal returns, such net operating losses can be carried backward for two years to offset past income and then kept on a taxpayer’s books for 20 years, though Mr. Trump’s losses could only qualify for a 15-year carryforward under the law at the time
So one: Its actually legal. Two, Hillary is a hypocrite since she did the same thing. Three, guess which president was the one who made that into law?
This shit is perfectly fine as long as she actually incurred a net loss worth 690k in the previous 20 years. Same with Trump lmao
Did you really think this would surprise anyone? This election isn't really about policy, just two deplorable personalities vying out of a sense of entitlement.
>she knows she can do exactly what Trump has done and the media won't care
Because all the media owners are her donors. It's not an accident that the media is on her side in all things. I wish Trump would make some videos explaining these things.
No surprise here.
YOU'RE NOT ALLOWED TO CRITICIZE ALWAYS CORRECT ON EVERYTHING HILLARY
And the CF university thing gaining the student debt bubble. The no criteria entry so anyone could enrol and get in debt and only 10% have passed and the rest have huge debts for a course that was useless anyway? And then she has the nerve to suggest free university?
>Being this dense
>even for CTR
Wew
she is dumb? she is not buddy. realize media cover? all lugenpresse is going for trump, not for crooked hillary
There was a thread on this yesterday for interested anons.
Hillary had a net capital loss (NCL) in her long-term capital gains last year so she can carry it over into this year and offset her capital gains tax for 2016.
This is exactly what Trump did with his income when he had a net operating loss (NOL) back in 1995. He carried it over and offset his income tax from 1995 to 2010.
...
...
..implying that Brietbart is anything close to resembling a "news organization"
...cuck...
She's seemingly guilty of every crime imaginable, so it's almost impossible for Trump to stop exposing her.
O shit
>Women
>Ever being wrong
Choose one Sven
Clinton paid an effective tax rate of 34 percent. Romney paid about 13 percent. What did Trump pay?
This must be fake. If she had done something as bad as what Trump did the media would have also called her out on it. The fact that this did not come up months ago when she released them proves it.
Oh wait...
>breitbart
No wonder.
Yes but what business lost a billion dollars and how did they account for that? If you read the NY Times article about this, you would see that the justification for the billion dollar write down was missing from the leak
>inb4 casinos
Taj mahal was bankrupted in 1991 not 1995
It's good to know that progressives don't care about rape victims when it's inconvenient for them.
Is there any way to generate a nude Tayne?
Let's go faggots let's get this visible everywhere. Every platform every hashtag
Finish the fight. There's only so many days left
Glory to the emperor
I live in Vermont and I can tell you, progressives are really shitty people. I wish they'd fuck off back to what ever multicultural city they came from.
Literally everyone in the country who runs a business does it when their company has an annual loss.
This isn't some shady, underhanded tactic only the "super rich" can use, it's an intended function in the tax code to allow struggling businesses to rebound.
From the NY Times article...
“This absolutely strengthens the case for disclosure,” Mr. Rosenthal said. “A loss of that magnitude raises all kinds of red flags.”
Mr. Trump’s records indicate that there was an attached statement that explained the net operating loss being carried forward. “That’s so tantalizing,” Mr. Holtz-Eakin said. “I’d love to see that statement.”
Mr. Trump, of course, is free to release it. It would probably answer many questions about the source of the losses. It would also help explain whether these were legitimate business losses or “accounting gimmicks and abusive tax shelters,” as Mr. Rosenthal put it.
There are a number of accounting tactics that Mr. Trump might have used to generate such a huge loss, some of them considered highly aggressive and of dubious legitimacy, accounting experts said.
This
Leftist intellectuals regularly critique this and call it fascist however so expect them to bitch regardless
*(((MR ROSENTHAL)))
>(((Rosenthal)))
>Not even clicking on the link that goes directly towards her taxes.
The modern CTR/Something Awful goon everyone.
Also if anything WAS illegal, the IRS would have gone after Trump. They would have noticed that so-called missing write off. This is a pathetically bad story that the editor of the NYT is possibly going to go to prison over.
>I have nothing to say about the actual content, just pointing out the jew name
Good work, guys.
>Aggressive accounting tactics
Can this be a new meme?
there are shades of legality when it comes to tax evasion. Its not all black and white.
And that 'pathetically bad' story is getting a whole lot of traction, even on Cred Forums
You can't use a newspaper majority owned by a Mexican, that endorsed Clinton just because they were once considered credible. Those days are long over.
Thats a shit argument. Their content is still content. Just cause you dont like Mexicans and Clinton doesnt make their words any less powerful, important or truthful.
Whatever, they have become a WaPo or Politico tier garbage fest and just because you say the opposite doesn't make it true, Are you try to pose as the infamous "thought leader" Cred Forums. It's not working, you look like a fool to anyone paying even marginal attention.
Another thing asshole, I have zero problem with Mexicans you racist fuck I don't think any foreign entity should have anything to do with our political process, and that asshole supports Clinton and that shitty rag reflects it.
Yeah Hillary is fucking mentally retarded.
Actually it's not so much that, it's that she is such a cunt even her own people hate her. She is just an unlikable cunt. That's why she's trying so hard to stay hidden. The more people see her, the more they hate her, on an atavistic level.
I'm the racist fuck? You just said how you dismiss the NYT because it is
>majority owned by a Mexican, that endorsed Clinton
what the fuck man? And just about everyone in NYC supports Hillary over trump. Why shouldnt their top paper reflect that?
Which one, the deplorables, the taco bowls or the basement dwellers?
>breitbart
>townhall
intothetrash.jpg
Yes you're the racist, you glossed over the fact the issue I have is with a foreign actor trying to use what was once a respected news source as a megaphone for Hillary Clinton and zeroed in on the fact I mentioned he was Mexican. Did I say beaner, wetback? Any racial slurs at all? No. Because that's not the point, racist.
Truth.
Youre delusional dude
>genetic fallacy
And you need to sit down and do some serious introspection because your denial is radically unhealthy and you're going to wind up heavily medicated once the lies you tell yourself become unbelievable to even yourself, anymore.
ok pal
>20D trans dimensional space chess
kek
Because you shills keep spamming it.
Also the MSM always hypes up garbage like this. He did nothing illegal. He did what any rich business man would have done.
Also Bill Clinton actually signed into law back in 1993 that allowed Trump to do this.
Your memes suck CTR/Something Awful
Next comes the part where Trump reveals his returns and it turns out he's been paying taxes all along.
It's Kinda sad when some neckbeards on a Taiwanese boipussy forum can read trump better than the people on the jewstream media that do this for a living
CTR is not SA that's their 9gag tier bullshit deception in order to try and fool Cred Forums. It's pretty sad the dearth of talent 6 million dollars buys...
Does hating Trump as much as you hate Clinton make me a Hill shill? Does it make you a Trump shill? So much fucking dismissing of everybody because they are a 'shill'. Can't we just have political opinions and rational debate? I know it goes for both sides, its not just a Cred Forums phenomenon, but it seems worse here than elsewhere.
And yes, he wouldnt show that he was doing something blatantly illegal on his tax returns. That would be idiotic. But he may be using abusive tax shelters with questionable legality. Who knows? There is not enough info to tell. So we are left here speculating....
Nice try SA. Goons always have distinctive tell tale signs. You fit all of them
Again your making something out of nothing.
Here's the point: Hillary did the same fucking thing
Even if Trump didn't pay income tax there is no way to avoid pay taxes entirely. It's an oversimplification designed to only score political points buy that cunt. Trump has paid hundreds of millions of dollars.
We here at CTR value honesty and integrity in the presidential candidates we support.
Hillary made her tax returns public so they could be scrutinized. Trump hasnt. All we have a couple pages of Trumps leaked tax returnd from 20 years ago. Can't really say how equivalent they are, can we?
Nice try shill, the first, most basic 9gag tier tactic CTR shills use is to accuse someone who exposes their bullshit either SA or CTR. No one on Cred Forums will ever believe that tactic ever again after the threads that ran all week end proving the SA bullshit story was posted four hours after a leaked CTR conversation showing what they were going to try to do to Cred Forums and reddit, in some pathetic attempt to cover their asses. I kept every shred of evidence from that thread proving it's legitilmacy. Cred Forums crushed their little bitch asses. lol.
Pic related, see the time stamp?
cont.
Here is the first thread from thursday night.
See the time stamp. Want me to keep going asshole? I can. I will.
They literally don't give a shit about anything but being smug and snarky.
They couldn't care less about how deeply rotten of a person Hillary Clinton is.
To be fair, you're making something out of nothing as well. You and many others go around this board proclaiming people with differing opinions to be paid shills with no evidence other than shitty articles written by nothing more than bloggers. While there certainly are people paid to influence over the Internet, the extent to which many on this board believe it affects them is insane. Hillary and Trump don't give a damn about our little cult here. You wanna see paid shilling? Go to a major news org's comment section.
Here's a mind blower: what if people are being paid to call other people "shills"? What if you're a shill? How can I trust that you're really speaking your mind and posting in my best interest? You can't prove it, so it is once again one person'a word against another. To summarize, fuck the people unironically calling each other shills here. The candidates don't care about you, and they never have. They just laugh at our autistic frog drawings
Typical Goon move. They are notorious for blame shifting
As is CTR
>breitbart
he'll need to do more than just reaching out to his base that already believe hillary is hellspawn
