"Ah need mah AR-15 so ah can over-trow thuh gubbmint!"

>"Ah need mah AR-15 so ah can over-trow thuh gubbmint!"

Do you gun nuts even hear yourselves? Because of your stubborn fear of any kind of change, CHILDREN are DYING. You could stop it, but you won't.

Oh, and I almost forgot:
>drone strike kills you

Taliban did quite a good job, at resisting a modern military.

SHART

lasted long enough to get a plant into presidency and now kicking ass.

So? Who cares if kids die because of the 2nd amendment. When you push communism / socialism using the 1st amendment and millions die, it's the same shit.

I have to be worth tens of thousands on dollars to be drone strike, and in a just rebellion the missile company would be on the side of the rebels...eventually. Revolution is bloody. Life is bloody.

>shall not be infringed

...

>You used: DEAD CHILDREN ARGUMENT on Cred Forums!
>It's NOT VERY EFFECTIVE...

Fuck them motherfucking children.

>drone strike kills neighbors
>drone strike blows up neighborhood pool
>no need to pay HOAs anymore

looks like a win for me OP

>implying i have fear of change
>implying i give a shit about dying generation z faggots
>implying op wont have only one post by this id
reminder that you need police to run a police state so le drone strike kills you meme can fuck right off

Children are the true jews

...

shame that guns aren't the problem

/k/

Thanks for the reminder to filter gubbamint

ROLLING !

You're right, that's why I use an AR10.

Also,

>1 post by this ID

>muh chilren isa dyin'

why are leftfags so obsessed with "assault rifles"? pistols hurt just as much and are easier to hide.

>muh slippery slope
Legalising the vote for women led to crazy feminists that get offended by everything.
Legalising interracial marriage led to anti-white propaganda.
Legalising gay marriage led to beastiality rights in Canada.
All three led me to believe that any idea coming from jews is never for our benefit, and that, like a cancer, it will mutate into something terrible, and them grow like a malignant tumor.

yes, the gubment will just start drone striking everyone who has a gun. surely after doing so they will treat the rest of the population well!

>wins every single battle we had with them
>only leaves because baby boomer faggots were bawwing
>viet cong are fucking dead after the tet offensive
>we leave and the south falls due to south being fucking awful at everything
kys my mane

I'd argue they hurt more, a .223 will probably go right through you. A .45 will damn near take your arm off.

i just want to live

...

Because handguns actually make up the majority of gun violence but also tend to be caused by melanin enriched gentlemen.

>Shall not be infringed

This shit has been posted at least once a day for more than a year. I can't stand it.

spork, camping gear and m00t

looks like im dead meat

> Cred Forums is loafing about!
...
> MSM is confused!
> MSM hurt itself in its confusion!

Gimme that fingerbox

...

Why should the government take away the right of law abiding citizens because of minority of people that abuses the right?

Is this a joke ?

...

roll for pol

its much much more than that.

This board is for the discussion of news, world events, political issues, and other related topics.

Off-topic and Cred Forums-tier threads will be deleted (and possibly earn you a ban, if you persist).

No one will take the firearms. Get over it.

...

>it's only OK when WE compare things to Hitler

I hate liberals

I shot my AR that I assembled myself on BLM land for free for the first time this past weekend. Doesn't get any better than that.

Feelsgoodman.jpg

change is not always good you dumb libtard.

>drone strike kills you
>government loses all legitimacy

anything is possible my friendly goyim

Lets see

No Sane person needs a 50 round clip. What next, a galling gun? How about a Nuke?

seth rollins

I'll just leave this here.

this is why everyone wants Puerto Rico as a 51st state not Guam

>How about a Nuke
only if i can nuke your shitty island with it

Damn that worked out well only thing that could go much better is a car

Children die and taking away my constitutional rights won't stop it. Sort of like Final Destination. They won't get shot instead they'll die in a horrible car accident.

'Ere we go lads

1 post

...

...

...

caliber is key, thats muh point
i'd rather get shot with an AR than a DEagle

>MSM faints from damage taken
>MSM has whited out

...

rawlll

I guess I'll bite

rowling

>A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.

DID YOU NOTICE THAT OP?

IT'S FUCKING IMPORTANT, DO YOU SEE IT?

LET ME SHOW YOU

>A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State

COMMA

>the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.

Did you notice that?

The comma was incredibly important. Everything BEFORE the comma is a justification for what comes AFTER it.

Fuck, reroll

Rollerino

Making fun of gunfags is too easy. BTFO

What?

The worst atrocities committed by man was always government, not random assholes with guns. If the random assholes with guns can help deter another holocaust, I say it's worth the occasional tragedy. Stop being obtuse.

This was a good read, thanks yo.

>children in turd-world cunt-trees are dying
>a dollar a day can save an african child from starving!

that almost made me feel bad about the $800 in computer parts I ordered for my gaming PC and the $2400 worth of guns/ammo I bought last month for my gun collection

almost

rer@wll

I will survive

What's this?

I don't know what you're on about, I keep guns for the opportunity to kill people. If guns are banned I will possess guns illegally or kill people with my knives or chainsaw.

Yes because isis has been utterly BTFO by Obama's drones...... oh wait.

HK45C +20 (20)
Riot Armor +40 (60)
Sluts -10 (50)
Conquest Knight XV +35 (85)
Normal -10 (75)
Nerves of Steel +15 (90)

PROBABLY ALIVE to fuck the Sluts another day.

Do you cry when you cum in your 14-year-old boyfriend?

The government has a LOT more guns that that guy--what...they want to feel safe from us citizens?

>hydrostatic shock vs grainage.
I'd eat a .50DE vs a XM193 anyday

> hours away from wikileaks dump
> 1 post by this ID
> obvious bait thread

Hundreds of replies guaranteed

...

You can't drone strike an entire crowd because one person is armed without global retaliation, not in the US anyway.

oh you want a gun YOUR INSANE YOU FUCKING MADMAN WHY DONT U JUST SHOOT 78 BABIES IM SILLY LOOK AT ME IM SILLY

>50 round clip
>clip

Agreed, 50rd mags too cumbersome
But I'm down with coupled 30rd mags.

The AR-15 is literally a hunting rifle in a fancy case.

It's not "MUH SCARY ASSAULT RIFLE"

AR in this case doesn't even mean Assault Rifle


nigger

Your trolling sucks. If you're new then I understand, but you've got a long way to go...

Anyway, regarding the 2nd amendment, we've already won. America has spoken, we like our guns.

This is a strawman of the entire debate about the 2nd Amendment. The point is and has always been about the ability to simply get rid of an amendment, over a minor political issue. There are 318 million people in the US. There are around 32,000 gun related deaths in the US per year. Two-third's of these deaths are suicides.

Gun-control advocates never mention the suicide aspect of firearms ownership, which makes 2nd Amendment advocates suspicious of their intentions, especially with the lack of knowledge that gun-control advocates exhibit; not just about firearms but how they work, are used, and acquired.

Why should we overturn a Amendment because of the deaths of less than 0.02% of the population? Most of which are self-inflicted? That's the reality of gun-deaths in the US. The number of deaths from homicide is even smaller (11,000, so about 0.003% of the population).

The point, is that the entire gun-control argument is coming from a noble place but is incredibly ignorant. Same for gun nuts. Most of us aren't really smart enough to articulate our points but we know enough to point in the right directions.

It's easy to disregard but, the same Amendments that grant us the right to use this board, post controversial discussion on social media, or print and publish opinions are the same ones that allow us to own guns, or have a right to a fair trial.

It's like when a teacher catches a child eating glue or some sperg shit and takes away everyone's "glue privileges". It doesn't actually stop students from eating glue, it's just an arbitrary punishment for the behavior of a single student. It teaches the students that it's okay to be punished for the behavior of others.

Yes, we /k/ommandos act childish when people criticize our hobby but the point is still valid. We don't deserve to be punished (lose our rights) because of the actions of other people.

tl;dr We like guns, fuck off.

>Oh, and I almost forgot:
>>drone strike kills you

What is Vietnam?

What is the Iraq War?

Sage and report these bait threads

I have a feeling that the drone strikes would stop really quickly once LockMart employees' children started getting taken as hostages.

"OMG Donald Trump is literally Hitler"
"You silly republicants you don't need your weapons, we'll never elect Hitler"

eat shit you fucking snake. enemy and traitor of humanity and freedom. You are vile fucking worm shit. You are the lowest sack of cretinous garbage ever forced through your mothers torn, well used, sloppy, cum encrusted, parasite infested holes. You are the most vile, weaselly, verminous, scummy, low, god damned smear of grease and slime that ever cursed the diarrhea spewing guts of the lowest creature on earth. You are all that is wrong with the universe and I hope you live just long enough to curse your birth. You are worse than the inevitable heat death of the universe.

And the worst part, you arent even evil, just stupid. You are working for your own demise. The evil always eat their own. I hope you enjoy it :)

The left will always have a strong point by asking why the fuck it's ok for elementary schools to get shot up but not ok to expand background checks.

The right will always have a strong point that it is a right backed by numbers showing the relative safety of gun ownership.

It's an impasse and neither side will budge.

Remember how people like Dorner caused such a hassle as a lone gunman?

Remember how groups like the Taliban started as just small groups with rifles?

People act like the government could just drone strike all the gun owners, but that's nit easy when they don't have a definitive list of gun owners and where they live, not to mention the fact they live mixed in with non gun owners, and the fact that you would have no way to tell what gun owners were part of an uprising and from those who aren't.