Pol, the mental disorder known as Homosexuality was removed from the DSM in 1973 due to backlash from left wing groups...

Or a shorter one.

cambridge.org/core/journals/psychological-medicine/article/genome-wide-scan-demonstrates-significant-linkage-for-male-sexual-orientation/864518601436C95563EA670C5F380343

psychology is not science and ever has been

Not true. In actuality it's removed because despite what people here say Homosexuality isn't crippling to a person. It's not a mental illness and it doesn't interfere with daily living unlike things such as bipolar disorder, depression, schizophrenia, etc.

Of course Cred Forums will claim that all homosexuals are degenerate AIDS ridden faggots. But in reality, if you practice safe sex like a normal person and aren't a slut it really isn't a typical mental illness.

The 60-70s was most likely when it was infiltrated in order to push an agenda.

Psychology has technically never been normal as they used lobotomies and spun people around in chairs as treatment. Hell, they psychiatrists/psychologists themselves are usually abnormal themselves. They go into the field for 2 reasons usually. 1) Because they themselves are nuts and are trying to justify their own mental discrepancies or 2) they suck at medical school as they have the lowest scores on the medical licensing exams.

The true redpill is that psych is overall cucked but some illnesses like depression, etc can be attributed to neurotransmitter deficiencies or excess like in schizophrenia and mania. Scientific evidence can back those illnesses. Science does not back homosexuality as genetic. They only attempt to state there is either an excess or lack of estrogen/testosterone in the womb during development and that determines if someone ends up being homo. There are diseases like Klinefelters that IS genetic. These are men with XXY but look like women. These people are not usually homosexual regarding sexual preference though.

>cambridge.org/core/journals/psychological-medicine/article/genome-wide-scan-demonstrates-significant-linkage-for-male-sexual-orientation/864518601436C95563EA670C5F380343
A. R. Sanders (a1) (a2), E. R. Martin (a3), G. W. Beecham (a3), S. Guo (a3), K. Dawood (a4), G. Rieger (a5), J. A. Badner (a2), E. S. Gershon (a2), R. S. Krishnappa (a6), A. B. Kolundzija (a7), J. Duan (a1) (a2), P. V. Gejman (a1) (a2) and J. M. Bailey (a8)
(a1)

1Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, NorthShore University HealthSystem Research Institute, Evanston, IL, USA
(a2)

2Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

(a3)

3Department of Human Genetics, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
(a4)
4Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA

(a5)
5Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, England, UK

(a6)
6Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Elmhurst, NY, USA

(a7)
7Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

(a8)
8Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA

DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291714002451

I would say it is a marxist shithole, but who knows about that, there have been based kikes before btw.

Talk shit, get hit you literal Argentinian.

This is one journal article submitted by some of the most liberal hospitals in the nation. Can you find any others?

They also indicate prior tests on this particular gene showed no correlation.

>Findings from family and twin studies support a genetic contribution to the development of sexual orientation in men. However, previous studies have yielded conflicting evidence for linkage to chromosome Xq28.

Correlation is also much different from causation.

What if... it's a hereditary infection?

There's no evidence, because leftists get mad and boycott whenever Scientists probe into homosexuality.

Just because it's genetic (which it is, like virtually everything else) doesn't mean it's normal. The kikes have a shitload of genetic conditions due to inbreeding, which they'd be glad to cure, except they can't. You don't see people yelling that midgets are normal, or those ridiculous lardasses that can't even move due to congenital hormonal disorder, or those XXY hermaphrodites. Or wait you actually do.

Either way, it's irrelevant whether being gay is a choice or not, it's wrong in the evolutional sense, and is being punished by natural selection even as we speak.

That is pretty interesting but most likely untrue regarding humans.

CNS toxoplasmosis causes "ring enhancing lesions" on CT scans. When transmitted to a fetus, ultrasound usually shows calcification in the temporal lobes (which affect speech/hearing and understand language)

The problem with this, is that they also cause microcephaly (small head/brain), brain atrophy, and also hydranencephaly (absent cerebral hemispheres). This is not compatible with life.

show me proof it is genetic.

the true redpill is that humans go full retard with any introspective science where we observe our selves and formulate theories about us

like sociology and psychology

and reasons are quite simple, despite that these sciences if conducted objectively would allow us to infinitely improve society and ourselves first human ego gets in the way of "not-so-nice" conclusions like black people are intellectually inferior and homosexuality and the promiscuity that comes with it is in no way healthy - comes along black people and gays who don't like hearing this and instead of improving themselves they subvert the science rendering it useless. You can replace blacks and gays with literally any group of people on the earth by the way, human bias and ego will always run through and ruin these fields.
Reason number doux: if you fire your neurons you'd realise that knowing how society and people work (according to observable rules) and why very quickly leads you into figuring out how to influence masses of people with clear result. This isn't something you want to teach the hoi poloi now is it? So it's kept dumbed down like crazy and ridiculed.

Remove genes, are there still gays?

Fucking easy.

And if I had wheels I'd be a wagon.

god I love lesbian porn

homosexuality is logical. its like fucking a watermelon. stop hating yourself OP.

not everything is genetic. Nature and environmental factors play a large role in social development and sexual orientation. Conditioning can also play a role. Humans can be conditioned to find pleasure in just about anything, albeit not necessarily on purpose.

All behavior is created through a combination of environmental and genetic factors. Gayness, like being left handed or liking shit like Russel Crowe, are partly caused by environmental factor and partly caused by genetic factors.

This is exactly it.

>he didn't even read the suggestion as to why previous studies were lacking
And I never said it proved causation.

Homosexual tendancies/desires are normal

homosexuality roots in population increase and lack of other worries.

We see it in rats too.

Just Sabin tetrade my shit up sempai

Science has yet to actually find a gene, or how it's expressed (most important aspect of biology)

So Psychology and Sociology could be the most powerful field of studies, but human ego essentially makes it a meme degree with no value?

And all the real value is already leqrned/known by Jews who are of course implementing their mastery on us goyim?

Thanks user. That pill wasn't too hard too swallow.

Faggotery is not only genetic determinated, it is a epigenetic event

People with certains gens are more likely to be fags, but there is the ambiental influence to determinate it.

For the ambiental, it could be culture, teachng and etc

Never said you did. I was only reminding that the correlation doesn't always equal causation.

The article indicated suggestion of causation. It states in the title "Demonstrates significant linkage for male sexual orientation. In the abstract it says " Findings from family and twin studies support a genetic contribution to the development of sexual orientation in men. However, previous studies have yielded conflicting evidence for linkage to chromosome Xq28."

Their conclusion is attempting to state this particular chromosome possibly causes changes in male sex orientation when in fact other studies are conflicting, meaning if its not repeatable everytime the experiment or test is done, it cannot be deemed statistically significant and therefore no conclusion can be drawn.

kek

>someone got the joke
it was worth it

I actually agree with you dude

t. mentally ill homo

I agree 100%. Homosexuality is a mental disease. just like liberalism.

When I was a kid i touched dicks with a Portuguese neighbor boy. Now I am a 500+ lb virgin who's only other sexual experience was paying a middle aged prostitute $200 for a fucking hand job. Does this make me a fag? Or only 50% fag?

It makes you a sad man

I've heard many stories, and I don't believe it's in hereditary. Hereditary homosexuality gets bred out right? Other ape species have homosexuality.

I heard when the fetus starts producing testosterone for a male, not enough goes to the brain, just enough to have cock. That's why gay guys are submissive, expressivve and irrational, but have high creative skills

Def not saying faggots are bad people or crazy mentally ill fucks. I'm only showing yet another example of the left inserting non-evidence based propaganda into everything essentially to push an agenda and create an environment where everyone gets offended (witnessed now with PC culture), changing history (removing confederate flag), adding bullshit pronouns (ze, zir, whatever), and attempting to subvert science; the only discipline that helps to explain why things occur with evidence to back it up.

No it doesn't unless you conditioned yourself to enjoy touching dicks. You are just a fat ass dude who has succumbed to fast food and unhealthy habits which is exactly what the goyim are supposed to do.

the true redpill is Psychology is a lie. Every premise on psychology is based on Freud and Jung's hallucinations. Then we have now like 500 fields of psychology and all of them are based not on reality but on false premises.

You fail to realize that DSM was researched AND compiled by psychiatrists.

Psychiatrists observations about mental illness are totally different from psychologists.

I'm not sure why you confused DSM with psychology but I hope it's not due to bad will.

Nature selects out homosexuality as its doesn't help in procreation. Of course it is present in other animal species but what people fail to mention when comparing this idea, is that humans are the only "animal" with the idea of rational thought and morality. Apes can be homosexual but they don't have a reaction to it one way or another, they just do what they do in the moment. They aren't thinking, "that Harambe's ass was really tight, I'm gonna hit it again tomorrow." They just live in the present. When they get hungry they eat, when they get thirsty, they drink etc.

Right. The DSM is compiled by MDs (psychiatrists), psychologists are Ph.Ds and just do bullshit studies imo.

Homosexuality is not exactly genetic, attraction to men is what's genetic. Homosexual men inherit this preference from their heterosexual mothers.

You can't eliminate this gene without making women unattracted to men.

>psychologists

If you study the history of DSM you'll see that it was psychologists that started a movement to remove homosexuality from it in the DSM-II printed in the 60s.

There was a psychiatrist on this movement but it was only one.

Then of course the riots and civil movement legal actions started and everything changed in the 6th print of DSM-II released in 1973.

Psychologists were consultants of DSM-II. They didn't compile or researched it. This was done by psychyatrists

>10 people developed DSM-II

Not a single psychologist.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Psychiatric_Association

mankind as a whole is largely unaffected by selective pressures when to compared to the rest of the animal kingdom

post birth, of course

Dude are you fucking stupid. This is what I am saying. This is what the whole post is about. Psychiatrists compiled DSM
Psychologists and leftists pushed for homosexuality's removal from the DSM.

I'm a suck a dick now. You can fume about it all night

homosexuality is a natural mechanism to increase the fitness of a group by adding a drone to the group who will not compete for mating rights

I was confused because your phrase structure. I read it the wrong way.

>The DSM is compiled by MDs (psychiatrists), psychologists are Ph.Ds and just do bullshit studies imo.

I read this way:
>The DSM is compiled by MDs (psychiatrists) AND psychologists.

What you wanted to say was:

>The DSM is compiled by MDs (psychiatrists) only. Psychologists are not doctors and just have PhD in bullshit.

True. But with all this porn who needs bitches. Also I have clean water and electricity. Fuck you BRAZIL!

telegraph.co.uk/science/2016/03/15/homosexuality-may-be-triggered-by-environment-after-birth/

natureworldnews.com/articles/10443/20141118/homosexuality-genetic-strongest-evidence.htm

latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-genetic-homosexuality-nature-nurture-20151007-story.html

So why you trying to divide and conquer OP?
Nature vs Nurture doesn't exist it's Nature & Nurture.

>Hahaha! Oh wow! You really showed me by sucking cock!
Holy shit cock sucking fags deserve eternal hell.

Most homosexuals were molested during their formative years. They then perpetuate the cycle by molesting as many minors as they can get their hands on.

That claim is going into the real of uncertainty. Humans were at war with the Neanderthals, non-conformity to the tribe was punishable by death, chicks with small tits got executed, chicks only bred with the most alpha men. Somehow enough nig genes got into europe and homosexuality rose to 10% again?

>When they get hungry they eat, when they get thirsty, they drink etc.
Just like the lefties, neither think.

Another good theory is r/K selection
anonymousconservative.com/blog/the-theory/rk-selection-theory/

basically all this 'free' government shit makes them think like prey, so they just eat and fuck without conscious thought. If they spend too much time thinking and not enough time fucking something the predators eat them to extinction

I suppose I should have added in the words "these days" to the beginning of my statement. By and large, that type of behavior is more an exception than rule.

All you ever wanted to learn and more:
pastebin.com/aiTLKLJc
dailykos.com/story/2011/4/26/970357/-
jesus-is-savior.com/Evils in America/Sodomy/homosexuality_and_psychiatry.htm
content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,948045,00.html
freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1172711/posts
theroadtoemmaus.org/RdLb/22SxSo/PnSx/HSx/SocrdsHowAmerGay.htm
amazon.com/Homosexuality-American-Psychiatry-Politics-Diagnosis/dp/0691028370
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_and_psychology#Mental_health_issues
rt.com/news/356848-study-sexual-orientation-fixed/
mpcdot.com/forums/topic/6651-the-institute-for-advanced-homophobia/
2blowhards.com/archives/2007/02/aids_and_immune.html
catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=2625

--- average age of death for fags Is 42, not counting AIDS deaths
--- homos are 4 times as likely to commit murder
--- homos are 2 times as likely to go to prison
--- top 6 American serial killers were gay
--- a homo is 10-20 times as likely to be a child molester
--- half of fags have 500+ lifetime sex partners
--- more than half of fags got their start only after having been seduced by an older fag
nytimes.com/1982/05/11/science/new-homosexual-disorder-worries-health-officials.html?pagewanted=2
online.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/lgbt.2014.0020#utm_source=PR&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=LGBT
theroadtoemmaus.org/RdLb/22SxSo/PnSx/HSx/hosx_lifspn.htm
familyresearchinst.org/2008/12/the-longevity-of-homosexuals-before-and-after-the-aids-epidemic/
healthland.time.com/2013/02/27/same-sex-couples-not-as-healthy-as-heterosexual-married-couples/
renewamerica.com/columns/abbott/100424
washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/8/gay-couples-children-oppose-same-sex-marriage-tell/
tradyouth.org/2015/09/the-majority-of-homosexuals-are-spreading-hiv-on-purpose-and-its-being-covered-up/
dailysignal.com/2012/06/11/new-research-on-children-of-same-sex-parents-suggests-differences-matter/
libertynewsnow.com/tag/serial-killers
adherents.com/misc/hsk.html#source
mercatornet.com/articles/view/the_no_difference_theory_is_dead
independe...ys-8165971.html
american...lgbt-community/
psychcentral....or-homosexuals/
advocate....ence-lgbt-issue
ncbi.nlm..../pubmed/2589133
reuters.c...N0HJ25X20140924
jid.oxfordjou...143/2/188.short
ncbi.nlm....les/PMC1704818/
sciencedi...145213494000425
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4660555/

It actually keyed me on hairy middle aged men with dad bods. I know it's fucked up and weird but I can't help it. I've always thought children were ugly, even when I was a child myself.

>op is a faggot
Homosexuality is most likely epi-polygenetic and of incomplete penatrance.

This means it takes multiple genes, an outside factor likely during gestation, and is not always 100% expressed. This is why homosexuality, while a relatively low percentage of the population, is relatively uniform among mammals and cannot be "bred out".

Calling it a disorder implies that it negatively effects the ability of the organism to function. While it might make the organism evolutionary unfit due to it's inability, or unwillingness, to pass on it's genes it is not a disorder in the derogatory sense you are attempting to apply to it.

Homosexuality is no more a mental disorder than infertility is.

Your proclamation that there is ZERO evidence to suggest a genetic or epigenetic explanation simply displays your ignorance. Gestational studies focusing on parental hormones and twin studies show plenty of promising data.

The best anyone can say is it is a combination of secondary factors and genetics. No biologist in their right mind would refer to homosexuality as absolutely a mental disorder.

Yep, that's a Mexican. Hope you don't wonder why no cunt wants you cunts near them.

Not OP here.

It may be natural, but it is certainly a disorder. They die 20 or more years younger than straights. They have higher rates of STDs, addiction, crime, and molestation.

The expression of homosexuality in society is deeply subversive as it requires men to limit platonic relationships with men out of fear of seeming gay.

Not to mention that tolerating it as a society has opened the door for Transanything, pedo acceptance, and degeneracy we have yet to imagine.

If it isn't a medical disorder in and of itself then it brings disorder upon individuals and cultures that embrace it.

Ignore pic. I haven't had time to get my images organized since (((someone))) fried my old hard drive.

I sense a slippery slope fallacy here that i'm going to ignore for the moment.

What you have just described is a secondary effect of sticking things in your ass with no concern for your health. It's perfectly possible to be homosexual, practice safe sex, and die at the ripe old age of 90. Citing gay culture as evidence that homosexuality itself is a disorder is a non sequitur.

Homosexuality doesn't kill you 20 years faster, behavior does.

It's actually a chemical response that floods the womb of a women carrying her 4-6th child regardless if it's make or female. It causes gender confusion in the embryo and that person eventually grows up as the opposite sex because of the chemical flush they experience before they're even born.

ADHD is genetic, but still considered a mental disorder

>I sense a slippery slope fallacy here that i'm going to ignore for the moment.
You are new to Cred Forums. Slippery slope deals in the hypothetical future, not the observable now. The question here isn't will x result in y, it did. The gay marriage debate being settled in favor of gay marriage set the stage for the pushing of Transnonsense and polyamory. This isn't a hypothetical, it happened and continues to happen.

>What you have just described is a secondary effect of sticking things in your ass with no concern for your health. It's perfectly possible to be homosexual, practice safe sex, and die at the ripe old age of 90. Citing gay culture as evidence that homosexuality itself is a disorder is a non sequitur.
I disagree that culture is the cause, I hold that their "culture" reflects a shortsided and risky nature inherent to homosexuals. The nature of anal sex is riskier, even monogamously. The 90 year old faithful gay couple is a strawman from hell. The average heterosexual man has 8 lifetime sexual partners, the average gay >100. The top 20% of heterosexual males have over 15 sexual partners, the top 20% of gays >500. It is also notable that fewer than 5% of gay relationships are, in practice, monogamous. Most are polyamorous and many more cheat. My sauce is in the link dump above.

>Homosexuality doesn't kill you 20 years faster, behavior does.
This is a stupid argument. Homosexuality is inseparable from behavior. If you want to get a dick in you ass, you have many opportunities to do so. There is no moral sanction against homosexual behavior, I would even go so far as to say it is encouraged.

So does all the homophobia and transphobia on Cred Forums come from backwards religious thinking or what? Why can't the gays and trannies do what they want? I don't disagree that it's a disorder, but it's not exactly something you can correct and it's not like they're harming anybody. What do you guys propose, that we kill them all? Seems like a waste of a perfectly good human that could contribute to society.

>So does all the homophobia and transphobia on Cred Forums come from backwards religious thinking or what?
*tips fedora. Some of it, but they are objectively right.

>Why can't the gays and trannies do what they want?
Because they make society worse and spread lies and disease.

>I don't disagree that it's a disorder, but it's not exactly something you can correct and it's not like they're harming anybody.
It's disorderly, treatable, and harmful. In a saner era we had psychiatric treatment for every letter of LGBT.

>What do you guys propose, that we kill them all?
Nice strawman. We should shun it socially, treat it medically, and remove its legal protections. I'm open to criminal sanctions, but they execute themselves so that's moot.

>Seems like a waste of a perfectly good human that could contribute to society.
Criminal, drug addled, disease ridden, subversive perverts are not contributing to society. They are a net loss.

It's not a religious position at all. Gays get a disproportionate amount of diseases and don't contribute to the birth rate.

There are definitely epigenetic links to it though, because when a woman has multiple boys the risk of the youngest one being gay increases drastically.

Truth.

Psychology is the astrology of neurology.

then lolis will be legalized soon
lel i wanna kill myself

Kind of like being Argentinian, another inherited disease - user, I think you are on to something.

>We should shun it socially
So homosexuals should just live their lives as a lie so everyone can pretend they don't exist?
>treat it medically
because that's worked so well in the past
>and remove its legal protections.
meaning what? As far as I know, the only legal protections they have are not being discriminated against.
>I'm open to criminal sanctions
What crime are they committing? Sticking their penis in a consenting individual's asshole for pleasure? Or rubbing vaginas? I don't see the problem there. A hole's a hole, genitals are genitals; they're fantastic fun to stimulate. Nobody is hurt by this.

>Criminal, drug addled, disease ridden
These traits are not exclusive to homosexual individuals. If there is a heightened probability of homosexuals committing these acts I doubt it's directly linked to their orientation but rather because of stress, depression, and emotional instability as a result of being discriminated against and hated for something they can't change.

>It's disorderly
Sure
>treatable
Doubtful
>and harmful.
to who?

>Because they make society worse and spread lies
How are they making society worse and what lies are they spreading?

>but they are objectively right.
a very bold claim that I doubt you can back up.

See andStart reading this and you won't believe anything you just posted.

even if it IS genetic, it doesn't validate it as health.

Predispositions toward violence are genetic. That doesn't justify it as healthy.

Alcoholism. Addiction broadly. These things predominately only hurt the individual, but we don't, and we shouldn't, enable these things simply because someone is predisposed and is therefore "part of who they are".

>The 60-70s was most likely when it was infiltrated in order to push an agenda.

Freud literally attended the Frankfurt School - the place where cultural marxism was invented. He was a marxist and a communist. He was the founder of the idea that people are victims of society and their upbringing. That ideology was extended to the 'medical' stream of psychiatry to justify the idea that people were victims of biology.

>but some illnesses like depression, etc can be attributed to neurotransmitter deficiencies or excess like in schizophrenia and mania. Scientific evidence can back those illnesses.

No. They can't. There is exactly zero scientific evidence attributing depression to any neurotransmitter. There is no medical test to measure neurotransmitter levels in relation to any mental illness, and there is no 'normative' range or baseline established for what would be considered normal and what would be considered a diagnosable illness. The 'chemical imbalance' phrase was created and popularised by Pfizer in their tv ads for Zoloft during the 90s.

youtube.com/watch?v=twhvtzd6gXA

Mental illnesses are not 'discovered' they are invented. They are literally a list of thoughts/feelings/behaviours that are deemed socially/morally/culturally unacceptable. They are voted into the DSM by a panel of psychiatrists - 100% of whom previously worked for, consulted for, or sat on the board of major pharmaceutical companies.

A 'mental illness' cannot be diagnosed with physical observation. As soon as there is a physical, objectively measurable cause for thoughts/feelings/behaviour - like a Vitamin D deficiency, a thyroid condition, or a brain tumor - it CANNOT be diagnosed as a mental illness (according to the DSM) and all 'treatment' for mental illness must immediately be stopped.

>"there is no definition of a mental disorder. It’s bullshit. I mean, you just can’t define it."
-Allen Francis, Psychiatrist & Lead Editor of DSM-IV

>“Hannibal, whom I had come to resemble in these respects, had been the favorite hero of my later school days. Like so many boys of that age, I had sympathized not with the Romans but with the Carthaginians. And when in the higher classes I began to understand for the first time what it meant to belong to an alien race, and anti-Semitic feelings among the other boys warned me that I must take up a definite position, the figure of the Semitic general rose still higher in my esteem. To my youthful mind Hannibal and Rome symbolized the tenacity of Jewry and the organization of the Catholic Church.” - sigmund schlomo freud

At least he understood Hannibal wasn't a Kang.

No it wont. Pedophilia suits white men and might result in white children, they can't have that.

Some claim that male homosexuality is tied to testosterone in the womb and is recognizable through the ratio of ring to index finger. The only problem with that is the ratio also correlates with other things, like facial attractiveness. So while the leftist camp will push the one ratio, they'll ignore other correlations that would destroy their arguments. (for those that didn't know, most homos are ugly, rejected by potential mates and end up seeking affection from the same sex. many gays also hate the opposite sex for this very reason, the rejection makes them very bitter)

It really does bother me how many people are blue-pilled about psychiatry.

The true giveaway is when they use 'chemical imbalance' as an explanation.

I think if everyone just took a step back with their 'it's the jooz', and 'leftists are retarded' bullshit, they would realise that the real problem is psychiatry.

It really does infect every aspect of American society. Like the 2nd Amendment. People on Cred Forums will defend politicians who say 'we shouldn't allow people diagnosed with mental illness to have guns'.

Well, that's exactly the same as an arbitrary no-fly no-buy list. Any person can get any psychiatrist or psychologist to diagnose someone with a mental illness because the definitions are extremely broad, entirely subjective.

Anyone on Cred Forums could easily be diagnosed with 'Expressive Language Disorder' - which is basically swearing 'a lot'. No guns for you.

I hope I get to see the day when Cred Forums turns on psychiatry and seeks to undermine it, instead of trying to promote it further because 'faggotz are mentally ill'.

Some practical things to do would be:
>abolish coercive psychiatry.
>abolish the federal mandate to include psychiatry in all health insurance.
>de-fund publically funded psychiatric programs.
>Push for programs like MindMatters to be rolled out into schools (which focuses on building resilience, rather than creating safe spaces)
>stop giving federal student loans for psychiatry degrees or liberal arts.

psychology is a favorite weapon of the jews

We can't cause its not genetic