Who was in the wrong here?
Who was in the wrong here?
Kubrick is a hack
kek
director
this but unironically
he attacked her with a white penis, that is rape
if he had attacked her with a black vagina he would have been in the right
His traitorous droogs
set decorator
Your fucking mother
both are degenerates and deserve death
This.
the audience
I liked how in the Mad Magazine parody the giant porcelain dick was replaced by a bust of Dumbo
there are heroes on both sides
>black vagina
I'm a kissless virgin, but even I know all vaginas are pink!
do you think that lady was so horny that she fucks her cats
Going by the art in that house it looks like a good time was had by all.
In the book he rapes her to death. They obviously couldn't do that in the movie so he beats her to death with a giant dong.
>Kubrick being subtle as usual
Neither because they were both degenerates. Just look at the painting behind her, cross worthy
Is the book worth the read?
pyw
The White penis
>source: user's ass
This didn't actually happen.
Yes, it's actually quite fun learning all the slang words.
Stop reading once Alex is recovering in the hospital. That was the original ending, Burgess only added the other shit in later editions because he hated how successful the story had become and felt he had to spoon feed the reader the message that violence is bad. He was a miserable old fuck.
This I really think Kubrick is shit
Only in the inside
You have to be 18 to post on here, kid.
Definitely overrated as a serious film maker but still makes solid movies
ACO really isn't bad though. The worst offenders when it comes to hack trash are The Shining and Full Metal Jacket
is there an archive of old mad magazines somewhere online
Guarantee I've been here longer than you kiddo
THE MODERN AGE
White people
I'm kind of inclined to agree. Besides Eyes Wide Shut and The Shining his movies aren't very memorable.
I had no idea that was the originally intended ending. I hope you post in /lit/.