What did Rambo III mean by this?

What did Rambo III mean by this?

Other urls found in this thread:

amazon.com/Confessions-Economic-Hit-John-Perkins/dp/0452287081
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rohingya_conflict
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet–Afghan_War
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>be american
>get shot by someone using your own weapons

Yesterday's friend is today's enemy.

It was a different time

Literally nothing wrong with funding terror groups then funding other terror groups to get rid of the terror groups you just funded.

>against Russia = good guys
>against USA = bad guys

That's about the jist of it

still going on today, just replace mujahideen with SDF. probably the same result too.

I-it was a different t-time

LMAO I find it UNFATHOMABLE how the vast, vast majority of internet socialists STILL support Rojav- I mean the imperialist American protectorate of Kurdistan TM

It was a different time.

Bin Laden was an executive producer.

It's funny - Hollywood still has a hate boner for Russians and a slavish devotion to Islam.

It's like they refuse to learn.

Sylvester Stallone is a Russiaphobe.

>different time

Turn on your TV. You'll see a million and one Americuck shows screeching that Russian is the big bad and that brave """"""""""rebels"""""""" beheading children are the "freedom fighters of peace".

They literally did a re-run of 80's Afghanistan in Syria a few years back.

When some former ISIS commander blows up a building or trucks a city block in burgerland, people will act shocked and surprised like they didn't see it coming.

one of James Bond also features mujahideen and shows them in good light.
Can't remember title (seen it long time ago), but it's one of my fav Bond movies. There is some chase on ice and Bond is very gentle towards the girl. More charming than pushing.

>still has a hateboner for Russians
Weren't a lot of hollywood fucks blacklisted because they were communist?
Wait a minute
>Hollywood's anti-russia standpoint is artificial and trying to get people on their side
>where as before, they were pro-gommunism
>and before that, pro-globalism
>and before that,anti-russian
It's almost as if hollywood is a propaganda machine or something

did they need military funding for the movie or why is it in it?

this, isolationism just doesn't work anymore, it's TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHTEEN AND WHY AREN'T WE DOING MORE TO DESTABILIZE EVERY COUNTRY THAT ISN'T ISRAEL IN THE MIDDLE EAST

>the shills have already infiltrated this thread

There have always been different factions in Hollywood, it isn't monolithic.

Majority used to be communists, all the way up until the 80s when the DoD started their infiltration under Reagan. This didn't abate until the Obama years, and the Communists have come out of the woodwork again.

...

forgot to add
>you profit in the process
>you profit in the process
>you profit in the process

You only profited from it three times out of that many instances?

nah i just bothered to add three times.

USA are the jews of nations, they not only fund rebels to take down your gov they then sell weapons and gadgets to that gov as well and then loan money to that government to reconstruct their shit.

Usa is the deffinition of satanic.

amazon.com/Confessions-Economic-Hit-John-Perkins/dp/0452287081

read this for more educational information.

It actually makes me sick how America actively fucks over other countries and ensures they'll never prosper

Although that said, my country does the same thing on a smaller scale

>my country does the same thing on a smaller scale
What country, user?

think about this though

do you really want muslims organizing

it was a different time

Australia
We often go along with America while also fucking with south east asian countries like East Timor

if anything it's made the middle east more religious from what I understand

kek

...

they were pretty cool dudes till the haji's attacked

Fuck you ZOG. Ba'athism is for the good of the whole region. Kurd and Ashkenazim supremacists in Turkey,Iraq, and Syria, need death.

>Kurd and Ashkenazim supremacists in Turkey,Iraq, and Syria, need death.
You're just as bad as ZOG

>based irony

We have no ambition in Iraq, but to remove a threat, and restore control of that country to it's own people. A campaign on the harsh terrain of a country as large as California may be longer and more difficult than some predict.

> based mujahideen

If this happens then I'll know we're stuck in a loop because Obama will truly have become the new Bill Clinton in being known as the cause of ISIS.

Pretty much. Saddam did nothing wrong when he gassed those fucking opportunistic desert gypsies.

This but not just with muslims
>The Tibetans are so persecuted. What do you mean the Dalai Lama wants to reinstate feudalism?
>Ukraine is being occupied by Russia. What do you mean the Ukrainian government is run by neo-nazis?
>Poor Jews, not allowed to practice their religion. What do you mean Iran reserves a seat in Parliament for its tiny Jewish minority while Israel is an apartheid state?
America can't be destroyed soon enough

>>Ukraine is being occupied by Russia. What do you mean the Ukrainian government is run by neo-nazis?

Literally a meme propagated by antifa

>>Poor Jews, not allowed to practice their religion. What do you mean Iran reserves a seat in Parliament for its tiny Jewish minority while Israel is an apartheid state?
You do realize there's an Arabs-only party with representation in the Knesset?

>>The Tibetans are so persecuted. What do you mean the Dalai Lama wants to reinstate feudalism?
So that makes ethnic replacement okay? And no, the Dalai Lama doesn't want to reinstate feudalism.

>Literally a meme propagated by antifa
No 15 year old American anarchist gives a shit about the Ukraine
>You do realize there's an Arabs-only party with representation in the Knesset?
Arabs are significantly underrepresented in the Knesset regardless, whereas Iran (the greatest threat to Israel in the region) gives their tiny Jewish population a seat, guaranteeing Jews are overrepresented. Yet in the American consciousness Israel is a liberal democracy and Iran is an anti-semitic totalitarian state.
>So that makes ethnic replacement okay? And no, the Dalai Lama doesn't want to reinstate feudalism.
Han moving to Tibet doesn't mean Tibetans are being "replaced". And he obviously isn't going to say that but that's the system Tibet had before China modernized them.

>ukraine is bad bcuz nazi
>but fuck those poor jews tho
???

>antifa = american antifa
t. amerimutt

>Arabs are significantly underrepresented in the Knesset regardless
Says who?
>Jews in Iran are only allowed to be represented by one person
>Arabs in Israel have their own party--the third largest in the Knesset--and also take part in other parties

>Han moving to Tibet
You mean Han being moved in by the government to make Tibetans a minority in their own homeland so they won't rise up in rebellion?

>only allowed one seat
yes but there is around 25 thousand jews in Iran by most estimates. the Iranian parliament has 290 seats and Iran has a population of 80 million, so each seat is roughly representative of 275 thousand people, meaning one guaranteed seat for jews is gross over-representation.

also regarding arab representation in the Knesset, arabs make roughly 20 percent of the Israeli population whereas the Joint List has 13 seats out of 120, meaning they only get ~10 percent of the seats.

>being against Israel makes you a Nazi

>>antifa = american antifa
>t. amerimutt
Which antifa are you accusing of fabricating that Ukraine has a nazi government, and to what end?
>Says who?
Wikipedia has 18 Arabs in the Knesset out of the 120 seats in the Knesset; that's under 10%, while Arabs are roughly 20% the population of Israel.
>You mean Han being moved in by the government to make Tibetans a minority in their own homeland so they won't rise up in rebellion?
Excuse me but where are the proofs?

18/120 isn't under 10% user, it's 15%. please apply yourself.

So a system in which your ethnic group only gets one seat--no more, no less--is better than a system in which you can get as many seats as the people vote for?

And Israel doesn't ban any religious groups from having representation in their parliament, whereas Iran bans Baha'i, who are more numerous than Jews.

Arabs in Israel vote for other parties as well. They aren't barred from the process.

>Which antifa are you accusing of fabricating that Ukraine has a nazi government, and to what end?
The "Ukraine is run by Nazis" is a talking point of both Russia (in bad faith) and European Antifa who fight alongside Donbass rebels (they actually believe it). Are there Nazis in the Azov Battalion? Yes. Are there Nazis in the Ukrainian parliament? Yes. They have 6 out of 450 seats. The NazBol party has 20 seats, by comparison.

>Wikipedia has 18 Arabs in the Knesset out of the 120 seats in the Knesset; that's under 10%, while Arabs are roughly 20% the population of Israel.
There is no law barring Arabs from electing as many of their group as they desire. Whereas Jews in Iran can only ever have 1 representative.

>Excuse me but where are the proofs?
>China's National Strategic Project to Develop the West, introduced during the 1980s after the Cultural Revolution, encourages the migration of Chinese people from other regions of China into Tibet with bonuses and favorable living conditions.
Are you also going to deny the systematic suppression of Muslims in Xinjiang?

Fug, I'm retarded
It's still an underrepresentation

Immense if corroborated

forgot to add
>(((you))) profit in the process.

yes i went there.

neither are jews, they still get to vote. a system in which my ethnic group is overrepresented by a multiple of 10 is better than a system where I would never get any representation in a regular election due to not having enough votes. Iran does have many issues, the point was that their antisemitism is grossly exaggerated in western media whereas Israel, a literal apartheid state gets a free pass, like Saudi Arabia, an Islamic monarchy, solely because of their business relations with the west.

>the point was that their antisemitism is grossly exaggerated in western media
Is it? Ahmadinejad is a Holocaust denier. And you cannot call Israel an apartheid state when they allow non-Jews an unresetricted voice in their government.

Now what I want to know is from what ideological basis all this criticism is coming from. If it's anti-American that makes sense. But if it's coming from an ML-point of view, you shouldn't be defending Iran, which is vehemently anti-Communist. Or Putin's Russia for that matter.

>a system in which my ethnic group is overrepresented by a multiple of 10 is better than a system where I would never get any representation in a regular election due to not having enough votes
And the system that Israel has is better than both of those scenarios. You forget Iran is a fucking theocracy to boot.

I'm not defending either, although I am an anti-american (except for arts, some of their arts are cool). Israel is very much an apartheid state though, I genuinely don't see the point in arguing this.

don't forget muh peaceful buddhists meme up until the Rohingya crisis made headlines

I mean if you're going by the dictionary definition of apartheid, you're wrong, but whatever.

The US likes to fund terrorists

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rohingya_conflict
>1947-to present
The neoliberal-in-chief didn't start the conflict

How did these conflicts start again? Unironically fighting Communism? Or was Communism a boogeyman too?

Any easy way to explain what Apartheid is to a brainlet? Asking for a friend.

Afghanistan conflict started when Soviets assassinated the communist leader because he wasn't their brand of communist and invaded

>a policy or system of segregation or discrimination on grounds of race

the retarded "enemy of an enemy is a friend" idea

So its a good thing

The moral of this story is just declare war. Seriously.

>those digits

Declare war on what?

Except there were multiple factions of the Mujahideen, and the United States mainly supported the moderates. Once the Soviets pulled out, the extremist Taliban tried to seize control from the other groups, who joined together under the Northern Alliance. The United States invaded Afghanistan in 2001 in support of the Northern Alliance against the Taliban.
I can't believe nobody in the thread has brought this up yet.

Declare war on your enemy instead of arranging a proxy war or funding some convenient extremist faction. Honestly what's the point of having the biggest army in the world if you can't just throw your weight around like it matters.