What the fuck?

The romans considered north Africa and took places turned soldiers constantly.

What are you retarded? You think that guy is anything other than a glorified bodyguard out of his element?

Now if this had been 400 years in the future we' d be talking.

>people didn't even notice that some people had different colored skin
bibit albus, bibit niger

Why would you even bother typing something out like that? It serves no purpose.

So...why is the black guy there though?

Oh shit! Stannis is alive!

were you there, cuck?

Why would they send good roman soldiers to die in shitholes like britain when they could send dirty tribals instead

That's Davos you idiot.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people_in_Ancient_Roman_history

It's a matter of historical record, you dumb cock.

Holy shit, Cred Forums absolutely fucking DESTROYED.

This is what you Trumpbabbies get when you run your mouth before you think. Racist pieces of shit.

That's just false. Legionaries were exclusively recruited in Italy out of people who had roman citizenship. Only an auxiliary soldier could have been black and then they would be specialised soldiers, like archers, cavalry etc.
OP's pic is PC propaganda nothing more.

North African are not and were not black. Holy fucking fuck.

Huh?

>The Afro-Hispanic Review

please tell me you're joking.

Slave turned soldier.
Like many of the people fighting northwards they were there to earn their freedom.

And roman soldiers returning from war were given land. A pretty good deal for a black man.

what the fuck is wrong with white people? Why are you so obsessed with niggers? I'm a chink and I have a visceral cringe reaction whenever I see niggers that are forced into European history. It takes me out of the movie completely and I can't take it seriously anymore. I know I'm not the only one and you faggots also have the cringe reaction but you are forced to take it and hide your feelings because this is some political soviet shit. Also, why the fuck is it always niggers? Why can't you make a TV show where Julius Ceasar is an asian or an Indian why niggers all the time there are other minorities.

North Africa was Middle Eastern.

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people_in_Ancient_Roman_history

>Rome had provinces in North Africa along the Mediterranean coast. The black African troops there were part of the Roman military.

lel, this is hilarious.

>The black African troops there

>source: none

oh, post your source that tells that blacks werent in the roman millitary, i will wait

But legionaires were good soldiers, italians have a rep of being god awful. In fact since the fall of Rome the states that make up modern Italy have had inept militaries to this day. 11 french men absoilutely destroyed thousands of italians at the battle of Pont St Louis.

North Africans vary pretty wildly from deep blick to basically white

HBO's Rome was accurate enough

No, I get that that is the plot of the show/movie. The point OP was making is that it's retarded because of how unrealistic it is.

They're not asking what the plot is, they're asking how they can justify such dumb casting.

This retard doesn't understand migratory patterns and human trading

actually 9 not 11

>sources: none
did you not scroll ot the bottom where it lists its sources user? do you not know how to work a computer?

Race is something lesser minds get preoccupied with. An effect of the visually inundated culture we live in.

were you, ape?

Because Jews look white and we've been taught they are untouchable due to their status as the most horrifically treated minorities ever.

Jews own and control most media. Their purpose is to turn all races in a mass of brown with no heritage or ancestry. Then they will be made dependent on the state. You see, Jews are Marxist and the existence of borders and races goes against Marxist teachings.

>Please prove a negative

Nigga, I'm not the one making the outlandish claim. You (the show) are claiming black people were in the Roman Military in Britain.

There has never been any indication of this ever happening. It's on you to prove your claim.

Here's my proof that they weren't in there Roman Military - there are no records of them being in the Roman Military in Britain

Done.

Are you unfamiliar with Lucius Quietus? He rose to be a governor under Trajan, and his berber cavalry are clearly depicted with dreadlocks on the pillars of Trajan.

I guess you're going to tell me that these guys aren't actually black, or something.

It only reveals just how animal you are.

Yes. I did. That's why I said;

>Sources: None

A conspiracy blog with no evidence is not a source. It's just ramblings by a weirdo.

That's of only if you think race is skin deep.

And you don't understand the Sahara, the giant desert that separated lower Africa from upper Africa. TO THIS DAY, Northern Africa is mostly brownish, not black.

i dont ever recall saying they were in the roman millitary in britain. i said "black folk were in the roman army" and they were, its historical fact. but please, keep putting words in my mouth if you like

>Berber

So not black.

>going to tell me these guys aren't actually black, or something

I guess you're going to tell me they or something.

>this is your brain on Cred Forumstardation

1. The thread is specifically about a black man in the Roman Military in Britain.

2. You said there were black folk in the roman army

This is also incorrect. There's literally no proof of this ever happening.

>Historical fact

Then give us the fucking citation already.

>2 books published by universitys are conspiracy blogs
what did this retard user mean by this?

Post more of these, I want to use them to trigger Cred Forumstards.

I don't hear a rebuttal. Just an ad hom.

Everything he said is an undeniable fact (with a bit of creative perception).

Yeah, look at how white this guy is. Hail the eternal anglo.

...

>The point OP was making
>they're not asking this, they're asking that

OP literally said nothing other than "What the fuck?". Way to project your own views onto him.

I think you guys just envy the Jews. They're what you wish the white people were.

Kill all niggers

It's not a book, you illiterate moron. It's a fucking """"journal"""" about Afro-Hispanic culture. Not a historical source. It's no more valid than YouTube comments.

You have no citation. You have no source.

Probably because...wait for it...it's not true.

before the thread gets deleted, what show is this?

legit question, why dont whiteys just take african stories and cast them with whites only?

>this guy

lol?

Congratulations user! You've figured out the minds of the stormlards

It's called context. If you have autism it might be hard to gauge.

They are unironically what they accuse white people of being.

All accusations of White Oppression and Privilege are simply projections by the Jewish people designed to deflect blame.

I'm STILL not hearing a rebuttal

That's a bust of Lucius Quietus, the Berber. Or, I guess you could call him a 'Moor.' That's a very loose translation of the Latin used by Cassius Dio in the historical source referring to the Dacian wars.

He was certainly black, though. Or are you saying middle eastern Africans typically have dread locks, wide noses, and lips like that?

try again

Riots in the streets

...

>Does every civilization of the last 2000 years hate me because I'm a vile parasite?

>No, it's because of a very specific, niche brand of illogical anti-semitism

Berbers were white/middle eastern.

Right. It's a bust.

>He was certainly black though

WUZ

Hahaha!
Take a look at this dude
He thinks people never pissed along and through

You probably think people didn't cross the gobi dessert either

The title is literally in the fucking picture you fucking moron.

Yes there were, and they brought the roman empire to the collapse.

No, because Gobi was a desert not a dessert.

because they don't want to start a race war?

So I guess you have autism then.

>rome recruited locals from every provence they controled
>except north africa, because reasons

>That's a bust of Lucius Quietus

hahahahahahhahahhh

Sure m8. We'll wait on that source, shall we.

>choosing to get upset over an 8 year old movie

why would you do this?

Look in a mirror
You sound like a nigger complaining about colonialism

No one said they didn't recruit from North Africa.

They're saying it's unlikely they ever recruited any blacks.

You realize North Africans aren't black, right? You're not that ignorant and retarded are you? You're not one of those low IQ ghetto mongoloids who is into the Black Egyptian fantasies are you?

So you admit Jews are every bit as bad as Europeans who colonized Africa?

At least you're an honest heeb.

Here's the real reason: Because good luck getting anyone to fund that.

You people seem to forget that films cost money to make.

And racists don't have money.

Because they're racists.

>north africa
>black

>racists rule the world and oppress PoC

>racists don't have money

This is an interesting contradiction.

Who would want to watch that?

When did I ever say the former?

>Berber
Frankly berbers (just as moors) are dark enough to be played by negroes just for the sake of it.

>NORTH AFRICA

The Roman Empire conquered large parts of africa you fucking retard. You telling me they ruled that whole area and didn’t have one black dude working for them. What’s the point of conquering a place then?

I have a theory, the alphabet has Semitic origins. The alphabet has profoundly restructured our brains. They were merely just ahead of the curve literately, which made them more clever than the purely oral culture.

I'm a chink mate. You white nationalists from Cred Forums are embarrassingly one minded. You call anyone who disagrees with you Jewish and you sincerely believe that an Illuminati-like organization controls the world.

>trans-sahara trade route didnt exist
youre right, no way any black people could have been in north africa

Hum sweetie there's literally a roman general called scipio AFRICANUS, so...

...

So you agree that racism is a myth?

Good.

I can fathom niggers in the Roman military I won't watch it because it's fucking ridiculous but I can fathom niggers in the Roman legions I can even suspend disbelief enough to imagine a Roman nigger legionnaire with a Latin name because it could have happened in theory. But why did they make Achilles and Zeus into niggers in the new TV show? I can't watch that now because I know for a fact that Zeus and Achilles were not niggers. It gets more ridiculous because Zeus is a nigger and Athena is a nigger but Hera Apollo and Hermes are not niggers if you follow this then the entire Panthenon should be niggers then because they are all related since Zeus is Hera's brother so I can't watch this now. I'd like to watch this but I won't because they have niggers in it. Plenty of other people won't be watching it this tv show won't be watched anywhere outside of Western cultural Marxist cities because Western white cultural marxists are self hating and enjoy seeing niggers in historical TV shows because they get pleasure out of culturally oppressing their rural and suburban working class by putting niggers everywhere.

They are also making a tv show where Julius Caesar is a nigger too. I won't be watching that either because I know Ceasar wasn't a nigger, Cesar was a member of Roman patrician nobility I know for sure they had zero niggers in there because they all traced their bloodlines back towards the founding of Rome and there would be no possible way for a nigger family to immigrate to Rome acquire land and wealth and citizenship and rise to patrician and senatorial rank and have this nigger then lead the Roman armies and take control of the Republic and become a dictator that would just never happen there were zero niggers in the roman senate why do they keep doing this?

No they aren't.

Are you telling me you don't understand that Africa is a continent with multiple races on it? Are you telling me you are so fucking retarded you think the Roman provinces that are modern day Algeria, Libya, Tunisia and Egypt were black?

Oh wait - you are. Becauase you're an uneducated ignorant sack of shit.

If it's a myth then why haven't they made the movies?

Oh right, because nobody wants to give shitty racists any money.

It didn't. Sub-Saharan Africans very rarely made it North. Rome didn't conquer any regions populated by sub-Saharans.

There would have been blacks around somewhere I guess.

They sure as fuck wouldn't have been in Britain, since Romans used local troops, and didn't even do that in Britain since it was so close to Rome itself. They didn't even use Gaul auxilaries.

that guy sounds like schizo. I'm Chinese-American btw

>racism is real and oppresses black people

>except it doesn't because racists have no power

Damn, with those skills you should be at the olympics my dude.

>What is Gods of Egypt and a million other movies that whitewash dark-skinned characters/people

You retards really do love to say "Heh what if we did this checkmate blacks" and completely ignore all the racist shit you've done over the years.

>No they aren't.
Idk. It was normal for me to see Morgan Freeman as that moore in Robin Hood back then.

>Journal
>Article
>Racism
ok

Go ahead and make that movie about white Martin Luther King, racist.

You won't because nobody respects your kind.

Oppression used to exist. But the pendulum has swung back in favor of blacks. And it's staying there, because we have superglue.

Racism is officially over.

why do black people anger you so, Cred Forums?

>geography
>treatsies
nice cherry picking though, i guess the fact that racism existed in the pass makes it not valid somehow to you?

Egyptians are Nilotic, not Negroid. Every once in a great while you see a black guy in a wall painting, and he's always got a cartouche ID'ing him as a Nubian. A foreigner from the south.

I am really, really feeling the lack of classical education in our public schools in this thread, mang.

Sure. It was also normal for Robin Hood and his little brother to speak in broad American accents.

Why would I want to make a movie about Martin Luther King, if I was a racist...?

>nobody respects your kind

So you admit white people are oppressed and marginalized?

>Oppression used to exist

It still exists. You just cited an example.

>racism is officially over

You literally just said you were racist.

it's not impossible, he could be the descendant of house slaves and be born free

Watch for posts like these. They're attempts to lump the board together to make it seem like there's consensus around here about politics

The only racist shit I've ever honestly done is call niggers niggers on the Internet. Nigger. Though that may change if I ever get accosted by some ethnocentric dumb shit like you high on seeing Black Panther for the tenth time.

Top kek

Get trolled.

Fuck off dude. Why would I care about Black Panther when there's tons of films with great black role models like Training Day?

>this is your brain on reddit

How can racism be real if it was coined not even 100 years ago?

I bet you're fun at parties. Who hurt you? Yeah we said the n-word but it was ironic. Just turn your brain off. DA JOOS. Edgy. Muh sekret club. Who cares?

How many Egyptians do you think looked like Jaime Lannister?

>a thing cant be real if there isnt a word for it
i guess gold didnt exist until someone thought there should be gold. and germs certainly never existed, the black plague was really witchcraft then, by your logic

But Cred Forums and reddit are the same thing.

>So you admit white people are oppressed and marginalized?

not him but white people are not oppressed and marginalized. Don't give me the muh jew shit, you oppress yourselves it's class warfare by the upper and middle class on lower class white people. Middle class and upper class white people and those aspiring to be middle class like the marxists take pleasure from cultural oppression. I noticed this especially prevalent in Anglo and colonial anglo societies the UK has deep class divisions with the upper classes completely separated from the lower classes they even speak with a different accent with upper received pronunciation they learend in high tier universities and see lower classes as cattle. In America the WASP and jewish elites hate lower class white people especially if they are from the South they want to keep this population demoralized and culturally oppressed.

Get owned sad fuck

>there were black folk in the roman army
Only in North Africa and few

>black judea destroyed by black romans
>black egyptians enslaved the black jews

>not him

So why would I read the rest of your post?

...

The guy who made the post said "African."

Egypt is in Africa.

Somehow I get the feeling you didn't know that.

So the fact you complained about the school system is quite ironic.

Laughable, really.

you don't have to but other people reading the thread will anyway

this

But why not make a separate unrelated post, since your post IS unrelated to the post you're linking to?

>95% of board is complaining about black panther, and then this thread
>Cred Forums general consensus dosent have a problem with black people though

This is why I like to put stuff that will make people stop reading the post right at the end of the post. So they don't realize I wasted their time until they get done reading it.

Yes, and the guy he was responding to was stating that Egyptianas were black.

And he corrected him.

Are you illiterate?

actually it is related because I was counter signalling the point you madethat white people are oppressed

Still boggles my mind that of all things on Cred Forums they recommend /ptg/. As if a ridiculously fast moving general is a good place to have a discussion.

You underestimate how hard was to travel from north africa to sub saharian africa back then

Stormfags are trying to astroturf

I didn't make that point though. The other poster implied that point.

I think you should probably read the threads more carefully before interjecting in the future.

if egyptions were black, does that mean afro americans should pay jewish people reparations for slavery?

I like niggers.

Are you retarded? They recommend PTG specifically because that's the sub-reddit that runs PTG.

when did astroturf become a verb?

No, because Jewish people are white so it evens out.

It's also why they can't cry about the holocaust, since they committed holocausts all over Africa.

*crickets*

you made that point. You clearly said " so you admit that white people are oppressed and marginalized" you were stating your position there which is that white people are oppressed and marginalized.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astroturfing

At least 20 years ago.

It's a bust that matches Cassius Dio's descriptions and accounts, and is reinforced by other depictions of Quietus, like the Pillar of Trajan, which I also posted earlier.
Wait, so you're discrediting the old Hellenic bust of Lucius Quietus? You going to call the Pillar of Trajan fake next? Fucking hell, the state of you faggots. Post on /his/ so we can all laugh at you.

They're semites just like arabs.

>trans-sahara trade route didnt exist

Yup, it was not established until the arab kingdoms. The only real connection Rome had back then was very small speculation and stories.

>Dio
>Pillar
Is this...?

You don't know who Cassius Dio is and you're talking about Roman history? KEK

semites is not a race but a language group

>astroturf and astroturfing are the same word

this is bait, or just really really dumb

>Lucius Quietus,
>nigger
>Quietus
I guess maybe as an ironic name ?

it has a halo-type

Man.. if they want to add more minority characters to television and movies that's fine. Hell, write entire stories that have nothing but colored characters. There's so many reasonable ways to do this and it wouldn't matter, if that's what people want more power to them. Why would you change the race of pre-existing, established characters? More importantly changing the race of historical figures..? To me as a white person having white characters and people replaced and portrayed as black doesn't feel like including people to exist with us, it has clear implications of replacing us entirely.

>tfw when centrist
>tfw I laugh at both Cred Forums and the special snowflakes being offended by political talk itt

By the same argument you guys use to justify blacks in Asgard, he is playing a god.

>tfw Cred Forumstards have started getting so butthurt at centrism that they try to paint it with the same brush as liberalism
>Cred Forums is getting this desperate because there are so few people on their side

>implying only Cred Forums does this
Found the aforementioned special snowflake

(you)

Bish, where else have you seen people do this?

>berbers
>blacks

WE WUZ

>where else have you seen people do this?
Literallly everytime someone doesn't agree with your opinion, but also disagrees with your opposition's opinion.
"If you are not with us you are against us" is in full force these days.

watch out Satan, they'll call you a fence sitter with no convictions for not following an ideology dogmatically and for believing you shouldn't judge an individual based on the race they happened to be born into

I didn't state my position though. I'm saying he agrees with the Alt-Right consensus.

> "If you are not with us you are against us"
this is true tho centrists and liberalists get the bullet too if you don't like us feel free to fuck off back to rebdit CNN and antifa

It's not a bust of Quietus. It's just a random bust.

I'm going to call your claims that this random bust is of anyone noteworthy as bullshit yes.

>post on /his/

If /his/ thinks random busts with no verifiable origin are busts of noteworthy people because some faggot on Cred Forums says so, I'll be laughing at them.

You're posting random busts of uknown people and assigning them to random historical figures and you're talking about history? KEK

Just because your not welcome at those places, and you're able to speak freely here, doesn't make it your place idiot.

based

Yeah, but this is HIS place though. Racism has always been an enjoyable mainstay of 4chins.

it doesn't but it's so over saturated with Cred Forums and racism and fascist narratives enough to make your existence here completely miserable

>liberalists
who.gif

The loud and belligerent will be loud and belligerent. They like to pump out a steady stream of crap to, again, astroturf some sort of consensus.

hey havent you seen the media? training day never existed this is the first movie to have black people in it ever and it should be treated like black people are being freed all over again.

Not only that, it could easily pass as a white person.

I LIKE NIGGERS

yes and you will have to deal with it because this place is full of loud and belligerent racists who are in literally every thread certainly any thread that's vaguely related to politics so you won't be able to avoid it and since you can't avoid it you either have to accept it or fuck off back to somewhere else

What is it about the left that makes it impossible for them to meme? Everything they produce is strawmanning garbage.

wrong. I'm not accepting it, I'm exposing it. Do the same.

>this place is full of loud and belligerent racists
lel seriously?

exposing what lol? You cannot fight it here. You cannot fight the narrative here. It's impossible because it's oversaturated with people who will never change their minds to the point where the narrative matters more than anything that's factual or true this is the same for leftist forums as well tho they have their own narrative you will not be able to flip a single person here and ultimately you will jsut waste your time

Because we have our own history and don't need to project ourselves onto other cultures

You sound pretty defeated, why even come here then?

>They're what you wish the white people were
Nomadic parasites who can't build their own shit and so have to worm their way into our institutions on guilt, bribery, and cronyism?

the left is completely insincere and they know that they are full of shit on a lot of the points they make they always struggle with mental gymnastics and wrongthink to justify the correct socially acceptable views they hold and try to pontificate this makes it impossible for them to meme. The right doesn't have this problem because it comes from a position of pure simple sincerity and certainty, the far right may not always be right but they are sincere and are sure of their convictions

I'm a far right neo-nazi tho

This, you can't bluepill people. Once you know the facts, you can't regress into the ignorance of liberalism. It's a losing fight.

it's not a narrative. It's facts. Your narrative struggles because your fantasies don't align with reality.

Why "flip" anyone? Why not just accept that niggers didn't exist in the British Roman forces?

Why even argue this absurd point? In what way does trying to perpetuate a fantasy serve your politics?

If you need to lie...perhaps your ideas are wrong?

so much Cred Forums damage control its almost embarrassing

this is who you are up against

>mfw Cred Forums is crying again

have you ever seen a berber?

They're not white

@94856192
@94856214
>this desperate for (you)s

...

Cred Forums is the epitome of strawmanning though. Your main enemy doesn't even exist. Go actually ask a "progressive," Jew or otherwise, why they think what they do. It's not a conspiracy to wipe you out. They actually do believe what they say.

>they actually do believe what they say

So Cred Forums ISN'T strawmanning then?

and/or russian trolls, can't deny that there here too

>Lepanto
>Italian wars
>Mercenaries
>Venice
??????

They don't have a hidden sikkrit agenda.

Spartans had dreadlocks, are you going to tell us they where sub saharan african as well?

Just because there were some niggers in Rome doesn't mean it justifies putting one in a group of three. That would mean there's a ratio of 1 in 3 to be a nigger which was not the case, at the time. That is not a realistic representation of the number of niggers in Rome.

Don't forget the raging soccer moms who were invited over by Cred Forums.

Cred Forums would have you believe "Open borders" stems from a conspiracy by inherently evil Joos to create a slave race. If you've actually talked to any of these people in person without shouting at them and calling them names, you'd see it comes from misplaced empathy and that simple childish idea of "why have borders? We're all human after all."

...

could be but communists are documented as doing that kind of thing to political opponents

Nice deflection tactics, tourists.

damage control

Of course not, but on the other hand, are you going to tell me the northern Africans had dreadlocks? Did the Phoenician civilizations like the Carthaginians had dreadlocks? Show me one historical depiction where they did.

Did the Libyans often used by the Romans have dreadlocks? Please, show me. Or better yet, show me a modern north African racial archetype with dreadlocks, or that resembles the berbers on the Pillar of Trajan in any way.

>can't build their own shit
>highest registered IQ in the country
inb4 THE JOOS KEEPING US DOWN negroid tactic of saying the iq tests are designed for jews.

But Cred Forums is usually accused of being wrong for taking what progressives say as literal.

Which is it?

>Cred Forums would have you believe "Open borders" stems from a conspiracy by inherently evil Joos to create a slave race.

But that's literally what progressives and jews have said. You just said to take them on face value. They literally have shows, campaigns etc celebrating race mixing and saying it will make the world better.

>you'd see it comes from misplaced empathy and that simple childish idea of "why have borders? We're all human after all."

I mean, that's precisely what Cred Forums says - that many of these people are gullible idiots who allow their empathy to be used against their interests.

>people with high iq are sneaky and secretive
Wow

> conspiracy to wipe us out
it doesn't have to be a conspiracy to have the end result

> main enemy doesn't even exist
leftists are autistic. /leftypol/ takes everything Cred Forums says at face value because it's fucking autistic most extreme right wingers don't even care for jews that much, sure attacking jews is fun because it undermines the civility of the entire liberal social order and it is subversive the jews are fun to attack because they are a scared cow and are arrogant and retarded and comfortable in their victim and sacred cow status and a lot of them are malicious but the main issues are liberalism and egalitarianism which are born out of puritan christian values and unitarian Protestant settler colonial beliefs and ideas which are the genesis of modern marxist virtue signalling cucking whig history progressivism and other shit. It's really the fucking protestants that need to be wiped out imo but every ideology needs a simple and succinct mesage and an enemy to rally around and the goons need someone to hate so they have the jews

Please show me where there are dreadlocks on the pillar of trajan.

>trumpfag
>calls others tourist
hmmm

what a terrible, terrible thread from start to finish

>black folk
back2reddit

Daily reminder !!!

NORTH AFRICANS WERE NOT NIGGERS

Daily Reminder !!!

>Highest IQ's

>Can't build anything

Can you expect anything better when it involves niggers?

GLOBAL BRAZIL
RULED BY JEWISH VENTURE CAPITALISTS AND CHINESE OLIGARCHS
E T H N I C A L L Y S T R A T I F I E D N E W W O R L D O R D E R
NO STATES
A BROWN COMPLACENT MASS RULED BY UNTETHERED CAPITALISM

The celebration of race-mixing is more niche than you think and it comes from the same "one human tribe" sentiment. The examples I've seen are typically created by mixed-race people themselves. And the people on twitter you put in three parenthesis aren't part of a council of evil trying to create a slave race. You'll find extremists who want to "punish" white people, but they're far from mainstream. I'm sure you realize you wouldn't want to be judged by what your enemies say you think?

I swear this is the only place on the internet that ignores the fact that it's pretty well documented that there were fuckloads of black Berbers due to their incredibly nomadic nature.

Then again this is the same place that outright refuses to believe that the Moors had a large black population just because they conquered and fucked the shit out of Sicily's women

From what i can tell, none of the Moorish cavalry men on the pillar of trajan is of sub Saharan origins.

You really need to learn the difference between north africa and sub sahara.

>citation needed

Turbosatan

They’re not black either.

There is not one "black" you dumb nigger. Neither berbers nor moors look like that monkey in the OP pic.

Are you using an Intel Chip in your computer?

I've watched this shit movie but I dont even remember this

>asking Cred Forums to know anything about story
Rome was a multicultural empire that embraced, absorved and transformed the culture around it. It was never a big empire but it is still more relevant than the giant ones that happened on Asian because of this aspect. While there weren't many to form a community and most were slaves, there were sub-saharian africans (meaning: black) on Rome.

>citation needed

You need someone to tell you that extremely nomadic African people on horses didn't go south and fuck niggers? Even with the prominence of their usage of Nubian-style weaponry?

Genetically, there were a fuckload of black Berbers and Moors. Moors probably moreso because of the hundreds of years of close proximity to literally the richest, most powerful sub-Saharan African kingdom to ever exist.

There were sub-saharian africans in Rome too, retard. We're not arguing egyptians were black, we're arguing black slaves were, though rare, existent.

It doesn't matter if it's conscious or not are you aware of the term useful idiot? It's retarded people with good intentions who want to to make society more fair more tolerant more weak and more permissive because it feels good to them the anti apartheid whites in South Africa were probably full of good intentions the liberal Israelis who want Israel to accept Palestinians are also full of good intentions but they are useful idiots because they undermine the entire foundation of their state and society because they want to feel good about themselves they want good press from progressive outlets and they want to virtue signal if there wasn't a vast conspiracy to import refugees into Europe (there was) the average middle class urban progressive accepted it because he's a useful idiot who is emotionally manipulated and the end result of his emotional manipulation is instability rapes crime division in the EU between East and West

They is proof of dreadlocks in the Minoan civilisation, they don’t belong to just one group of people.Lots of Bronze Age civilisations had people with them.

Eat shit.
Glad I never watched that garbage.

It's posted in this thread above. It's impossible to tell but they certainly do look black, as does the bust of Lucius Quietus. Ironically, his race was never much of a question because his patron was the Optimus Princeps. I'm sorry, but I'm not familiar with any northern Africans that have the dreadlocks and facial types depicted on the Pillar. It's really more of a stretch to call them white than it is to call them black, isn't it?

>a civilization that raped pillaged and murdered just about every man in gaul is an accepting multicultural society.

Everywhere the romans went they molded the local society to fit into the roman world. Not the other way around.

The sahara has this huge highway called the nile

NORTH AFRICANS ARE NOT BLACK OR WHITE. THEY ARE NORTH AFRICAN.

How fucking dense are you?

I said there is not one "black" you dumb nigger. You can't lump berbers together with jungle niggers like yourself just because you have shit skin.

Show me another depiction of a north African with dreadlocks. I'll wait.

What does this have to do with the different ethnicities evolving in the the areas separated by the sahara?

Here have a very important north african king that looks considerably more like the men on Trajans column than any sub saharan every will

>traders trading are now proof of multi culti norms in the roman empire.

And still
>citation needed

Stop being authistic.

Are you blind? How do those look like dreadlocks in any way, shape or form? Are you going to tell me that the Moors on the Pillar don't have dreadlocks now? Maybe you're looking at the Dacians to the right.

>Greek with curles
Hahahaha

>Are you unfamiliar with Lucius Quietus? He rose to be a governor under Trajan, and his berber cavalry are clearly depicted with dreadlocks on the pillars of Trajan.
>
>I guess you're going to tell me that these guys aren't actually black, or something.

Lotsa different cultures braided their hair back then. Celts did it too, but then they tried every hairstyle under the sun. Egyptian wigs that their nobles wore were made of braided hair.

Braids and dreads aren't a particularly black thing.

You're honestly pretending they're dreadlocks?

Jesus fucking christ, you've gone full Wuz.

>the bust of Lucius Quietus

WHAT BUST OF LUCIUS QUIETUS

YOU POSTED A RANDOM BUST THAT HAS NO VERIFIABLE LINEAGE

This is full blown fucking Kangz. Holy shit.

Celts didn't braid every bit of hair on their entire scalp, you brainlet. Holy fuck, you people are autistic and faceblind as hell.

>I said there is not one "black" you dumb nigger.
I'm not black

But I'm finding it hard to find the context of your quotations for the word "black". I'm not going to call you retarded but I am going to tell you to word that properly

Would work better if it were Polandball or Scandinavia And The World.

If you honestly think someone who looked like that bust with white skin would look out of place in a group of white people, you’re delusional.Big nose does not automatically =/=black person.

Name one time where even mere trading of ideas didn't also result in interracial breeding.

shareblue go

>phone posters

>im not black, but i do have a degree in feminist dance therapy

I don't know if it makes sense to make you undestand something so simple if it needs to be repeated twice verbatim. Maybe you get it like this:
Africa big. BIG. Many people. North people brown. West people black. East people black. South people black. Middle people black. But still, west people not east people. East people not south people. North people not west people.

I like how Cred Forumsthreads always seem to move at superspeed compared to everything else on the board because all the agitated Cred Forumstards gather in one place and throw a shitfit.

It's the movie board yet none of them watches any movies. I'd love to know how this became the designated Cred Forums hangout. Just because the moderation here is so poor?

>An empire with jew germans celts iberians berbers greeks illyrians pannonians dacians thracians syrians egyptians and many more is not multiculti

>first response is a nigger apologist
>gets BTFO
>waaaaah why can't Cred Forums leave us alone ;_;

>Cred Forums

Alright, time for me to end this thread.

Why are you retards assuming that there were no black conscripted into the Roman military machine? Why are you assuming that their descendants could never be granted citizenship and serve in the legions?

Do you not understand the function of the Roman military? Romans conquered. When they conquered, they would displace the men of fighting age by utilizing them as an auxiliary cohort, or sometimes even forcibly conscripting them to prevent a revolt in the newly acquired territory. They made use of plenty of puppet kingdoms as allies, and would use their men freely to their own purpose. Occasionally, an auxiliary might make enough of a contribution (often financially) to acquire citizenship. In this way, it is very possible that a sub Saharan African could have become a Roman citizen. Romans had strong views on race initially, but the ruling class of Rome was significantly diluted by the time it became an Empire, thanks to the wars of Sulla and Marius, Caesar, Augustus, and Antonius. Many 'new men' entered the ruling class from areas like Spain, so Rome became more cosmopolitan than you might imagine.

Rome used people. Any people. It did not care what sort of men fought for it, only that they were loyal and disciplined, and could be brought to heel. You're projecting your millennial obsession of identity politics onto a historical paradigm that rejects them outright.

If anything, by claiming there were no blacks in the Roman military machine, you are proposing that blacks were somehow too clever or powerful to be brought under Roman sway so that they might be used to fight for it. It's kind of like you're LARPing and doing WE WUZ shit by thinking you're doing the opposite. It's fucking hysterical.

First response is right though.
>actually using "BTFO"
Good grief, it's an 18+ site kid.

No it isn't, pretending you didn't read the thread doesn't make you look less retarded.
>kid
Make way for the big man!

I would watch that.

It seems you simply can't comprehend that people have different opinions than you do. To you, everyone who espouses a liberal view must either be a nefarious conspirator or a useful pawn who only cares about how they appear to others. It's true that most people don't think about what truly drives them and don't even have a real ideology they follow to begin with. But I've talked with and debated many people, and I've never spoken to anyone who who said they want to create a slave race. I've only ever heard that from radicals like you who claim they know what goes on in the minds of people they hate and fail to bring reasonable evidence.

Yes this site is an 18+ site. Did you seriously just admit to being under 18?

Yeah, the British Empire was multicultural too because they ruled over a bunch of blacks and Indians. I don't think you know what multicultural means

Did you seriously just try for the second time to deflect attention from how wrong you are?

>who said they want to create a slave race.
lol this is what you're getting tho

I hope Cred Forums is closed down again

The romans had spanish, syrian, arab, pannonian, and north african emperors

>DID YOU JUST
Wow. Using tumblr memes now, are you?

>troll thread for sad children episode

I wouldn't know about that. I imitated your wording in case you missed it.

Nice try. You just got outed as a tumblrbro.

>wikipedia as scource
Are you begging me to laugh at (you)?

Alright, as long as you remember what you learned about niggers in this thread.

Totally irrelevant unless they were ethnically Syrian, Arab etc. My great-Grandfather was born in colonial India but that doesn't make him an Indian does it

This is a terrible example, given that the British Empire used Indian Sikh troops to great effect. However, with the assistance of the East Empire Company's economic stranglehold, they did not need to resettle them.

Rome, on the other hand, would always conscript men of fighting age of a province that was conquered and would immediately deploy them across the world. Men recruited in Syria would be shipped to Roman Britain, and vice versa. Once their service was completed, they could settle where they liked. A lot of the time, they would settle near where they had served, because they had served for so long in that area that it felt more like home than where they had been born. It was also incentivized by the Romans, giving them deals on property. This was the Roman method of displacement and resettlement which allowed them to reduce the chance of revolt in newly acquired territories.

Any comparison to the British Empire is trying to shove a square peg into a round hole.

That they were in the Roman army? Yes.

yeah why are all those barbarians dressed as romans

Why would I not talk about their ethnicity

Please don't pull people other than your wrangler on your retard carousel.

>ayy lmao lemme paint this statue black so the historical figure it's depicting will also be black
Also those ain't black facial features t. Mengele

>n-no you!
Make way for the big man!

you know the spartans had dreads right, it's not really just a black thing historically

Did you read the thread and understand what you thought you learned is wrong?

Make way for the big man!

Ptolemaic ones probably looked pretty fucking white

Alright, when the redditor starts to sperg out niggers are redeemed.

Make way for the big man!

Looks pretty Italian honestly

North Africa was closer to Greek if anything at the time.

The middle easterners didn't come until well later, and that was after the Germans

And yet the Black "legacy" in neither the Ancient Brits, Greeks or Roman bodies dug up in these locations has been found in any of them hmmmmmmm.

how "white" do these people look to you?

In jewish movies? Sure. Not in reality. The ancestors of American niggers lived on the other side of the Sahara desert so they didn't have any realistic means of crossing it to get to Rome for the gibs. The Ethiopians were bordering Egypt, and there were probably some Ethiopians living in Egypt, but as a whole there is no mention of Ethiopians fighting in the Roman army or whatever.

They're mediterraneans dumb shit. Mediterraneans are Caucasians. The original Caucasians, in fact.

>This is a terrible example
No, it's a perfect example to demonstrate the difference between Imperialism and multiculturalism.
I've never seen any proof that any Roman emperors were ethnically non-European

Impossible? Maybe not.

Pretty exotic and certainly not the norm? Absolutely.

It's become the hot new meme to tokenize black people yet again by portraying them as Romans in entertainment media because the liberals think it makes them look good.

It doesnt really matter that much, it just vaguely annoys people who know even a little about SPQR's military organization and citizenship systems to see black faces smugly held up as Romans very blatantly saying "IF THIS BOTHERS YOU YOU ARE HITLER THIS IS ACCURATE REEE"

it's not that having non-European looking people portraying Romans is even bad, it's fucking TV and movies they're already disgustingly inaccurate anyway, and our societies are diverse in every way, far more than Roman Italy was, you could do an all-black I, Claudius reboot and nobody would care too much. It's this weird fetishistic obsession from a small group of 'progressives' with we wuzzing up history in some paternalistic "lets big up the darkies" do-gooding that fucks people off.

The 6 portrait can pass as white. As a whole, they look arabic.

that is taken to mean they were *from* there, not that they were that ethnicity

>Rome was black lol we're anti-racist
>No shows about actual ancient African History literally ever

literally shaking

>clicked on the thread thinking it was going to be an ironic GoT thread talking about Davos and other shit
>it's Cred Forums freaking out

not surprised desu

>WE WUZ ARABS AND MEDS.

Dagos are swarthy lad, they are still European

>Mediterraneans
do you consider these people to be "white"?

"Whites" are people with deeply rooted European ancestry. That guy is a LARP-er, probably following the teachings of Varg. Egyptians were not white, they weren't negroes either.

Yeah, it's kind of sad that the first thing Cred Forums notices is the black guy and not Davos.

>People thought the monkeys living naked in the jungle were the same as those who lived in castles before slavery was invented

Davos has been an absolute shit quippy character since Stannis' death and GOT has been trash since season 4 ended. What's there to talk about?

You could have atleast posted Saudis or Iraqis. The Lebanese are amongst the whitest looking mother fuckers in the East, regions of the former Mesoptamia in general are the closest looking to Euros lol.

White is a fairly new and meaningless term invented to distinquish colonials from the natives. It has never had any scientific basis whatsoever.

>distinquish colonials from the natives.
And who were the colonials? Europeans.

>the color of the stone defines the color of the person it represents

I guess the Irish really aren't white after all

Davos before those things.

>Pretty exotic and certainly not the norm? Absolutely.
this is the point. just because something was hypothetically possible doesn't mean it should be treated unironically as an historical norm.
"Black Romans" would make a wicked parody concept, but in your average historical drama it seems weird to place them in the Roman legion without comment by the story explaining how they got there unless the story takes place in the Roman territories of North Africa, and even then, "black people" (people with obvious sub-Saharan features) would be in the minority compared with native Egyptians, Carthaginians, Libyans, etc.

Spaniards, who aren't known for looking super blonde and nordic. There are many in the Levant who could pass. Not only because of Rome and Greece's history in the region but also because that is what they would have looked closest to, other Mediterraneans. That is what gulf arabs looked like before intermixing with Africans.

When will communists stop pushing this meme? Roman Africa, the province in modern North Africa, was populated by Berbers, Jews, Greeks and Romans. The niggers were on the other side of an immeasurably vast, impassable, inhospitable desert living in huts.

Oh, what a surprise, this meme again. I knew you would bring that up. The Irish were not considered "white" only by the Anglos and that was inherited by the US. Why? Because the Irish were not that well liked by the Anglos. Americans also didn't consider Germans white. It matters not because these were purely political and had no basis in reality. Whites has always held the meaning of Europeans. Europeans during the colonial period, you could call "European supremacists" as they held themselves superior to other groups, including other Caucasoid. It was the belief of Europe that it should rule the world.

"White" has simply replaced "European" mainly because there are a lot of immigrants who are lumped in that group (including groups), while white is pretty straightforward.

You’re the medical definition of a moron.

>Being kicked out of every country they were in
>Even hitler offered to take them out of the country in first class boats before the war
>Irrational antisemitism

Literal Marxist revisionism.

WE WUZ ROMANS INNIT BRUV

That's a meme, the Irish and the Italians were NEVER not considered white in the US. This meme was created because of a few anti-irish/italian sentiments by the KKK mostly because they were catholic. However, even amidst the anti-irish and italian sentiments they were still categorized as white on the US census even back then.

>white is a fairly new and meaningless term

This is what the soy cucks actually believe. How many points do you have in gender studies?

>points
>using video game terminology while calling someone soy
LOL LMAO ROFL

What did I fucking say, autist? By Anglos only, for political reasons. Europeans thought themselves as something else from the rest of the Caucasians. They just called themselves Europeans rather than "white", because there were no niggers or any other kind of people for that meaning to mean anything different than indigineous Europeans. But there are plenty of "Europeans" of different colors now, so that meaning no longer applies.

yas queen slay #fuckdrumpf and #fuckwhitepeople

I'm sorry to break this to you user but an article being published by a university doesn't mean anything in itself. To think otherwise is an Ad Hom fallacy. This doesn't mean that the article in question is right or wrong(i didn't read it).

You said by Anglos, but that wasn't the case. The Anglo elite in general did not hate the Irish nor consider them non-white. You're equating a belief held by extremist individuals with normal ones. Since when does the KKK speak for all Anglos? lol

Wtf are you even talking about? The Anglos during the colonial period didn't consider the Irish white. It's precisely why the American Anglos inherited that notion.