Why didn't the Spaniards simply kill off all the subhuman poo in the loo natives instead of making filthy shitskin...

Why didn't the Spaniards simply kill off all the subhuman poo in the loo natives instead of making filthy shitskin sudacas aka spics? The Brits were smart enough not to stick their dicks in the savages.

CHI

CA

but im not a filthy mexishit

just wondering why spain was so dumb

because spaniards were inferior to brits
it also explains why the US and canada became developed countries when the rest of america could not

Spanish and Portuguese people are moor rapebabies so naturally they'd make other rape babies with shitskins across the ocean.

Brits are white and sought to keep their lineage pure.

Completely different colony policies.

exactly, superior policies made by superior people led to superior countries

I'll tell you why.
The main reason of our existense is to fulfill the destruction of the anglosphere, this chore comes from the colonial age when spaniards whant to kill all the bongoroaches but they couldn't.
At these days, Spain is just a shade of it's past, spaniards became more peacefull and accepted their destiny,but here we inherited (via DNA and/cultural heritage) the need for anglo-destruction,this is our destiny manifesto, we'll never stop until we dessapear the last gringo in this damn world, and seems to be going really well.
You can't do anything, accept it, no matter how much do you shitpost here showing how afraid you are, no matter how dessesperate you are at the point to have to elect a president based on how much effort he put on delay our conquest.
Enjoy your burger fatty, it could be the last one.

Were mestizas worth it?

good post
nope

mestizos natives and niggers need to be gassed and replaced with northern spainiards in latin america

>The Brits were smart enough not to stick their dicks in the savages.
that's what they are pretending.
OP you have probably some hidden injun ancestry, like most americans.

citation needed

most white americans do not have native blood mixed in

Aztecs and Incas were far more organized and in big number than Tonto and their friends.

i have you know im 1/64th cherokee

>mexico
>taking land from us
>taking texas
ever wonder why texans always say "remember the alamo"?
Its because they wont dare let mexico take them
the most that mexico will get is commiefornia, new mexico, arizona, nevada, and utah

>spaniards were inferior to brits
spics had had pic related for 300 years when brits became relevant

Who cares about the past anyways.

texas
and thats exactly why you wont take them
thats also why they have so little restriction on guns

>most white americans do not have native blood mixed in
Accept your hidden injun ancestry please, you know it doesn't matters if they are from 1700s or some shit like that.

I frequently wonder the same thing

NA Natives got several "apocalypses" before the arrival though.

Glad about that, who says we want Texas? Chicanos perhaps doing their WE WUZ

This

Thats kind of irrelevant, remember the past and masturbate whit it much as you want, but you can't do much as an useless pray.
They wash your dishes, take care of your children, cook your food, drive your cars, they watch for your security.
You're at their mercy the whole day, the only thing you can do is integrate to them and expect they'll forgive you for be what you are.

They didn't send women with the men so the men took the native women, same thing is happening in Europe now.

hahahaha el chicANO

wtf is wrong with that baby

>subhuman poo in the loo natives
>implying natives were the poo in loo ones

So, what you're saying is that there aren't many young men in arab countries anymore? So that would mean many young girls would be open to getting BLEACHED by westerners, really makes the neurons fire that

Leí las cartas de cortes a Carlos V siempre hablaba sobre un tal montezuma o algo así, quien es?

All tropical territories were used as solely extraction places. What the Spaniards did was use native labor instead of African like the rest of the world. If you want to see tropical american British ex colonies look at Belize, Guyana, and Jamaica. They are all filled with Africans.
>The Brits were smart enough not to stick their dicks in the savages.
Oh but they did. The difference is that north american native populations were sparsely populated so any half-breeds got bleached by European immigration. Even most of the remaining "natives" have European blood in them.

Not sure if bait but he was the Aztec emperor.

lol almost half population in texas is mexican and the population just keeps growing. You are fucking doomed guero

CHI

Si al parecer se llevaba bien con cortes, hubo un trato mutuo. Le regalaba exclavas y los españoles le traían objetos preciosos de latinoamerica península

Racist "white" americans are hilarious.

this seems like a nice argument for a series/movie

na, sorry miguel

Maybe (in a not so latest future), a movie based on real facts.

>implying the Spanish weren't the shitskins

How do you say bump in spanish?

I don't get it, is one supposed to be worse than the other?

I agree with this assessment, but someone will inevitably say
>"blankets!"
The east coast should have just become a nord trading post with the new world desu

go to bed sudaca

>they're your slaves
>but they control you
Lmao, enjoy zika

>that excepptional deductive power
they surround you, mongrel

Si también lees la historia de Bernal Díaz del Castillo notarás que la relación tuvo sus altos y bajos.

It seemed more organized and harmonious before.

A lot of modern day stormies are mixed, figures they'd go mad with an identity crisis

If you want a serious answer it was for two reasons; Spain conquered lands millions of people living in them with a purely male force while the english stablished colonies in empty lands or almost empty with smaller tribes.

colonies composed by both genders*

kek, spain did not have that much of north america. most of the land north of mexico was just an empty claim.

the idea was to make a new race and make it work

Spain wasn't white to begin with anyway.

>spain did not have that much of north america
>american education

Yes.
Faggots and virgins would say otherwise.

Because you are a virgin with no clue what a pussy is. Pay a prostitute and you will understand why they had babies with them.

>Brits were smart enough not to stick their dicks in the savages

Yeah. That's really because Brits prefer inbreeding and incest.

No that's Muslims.

Brits prefer being cuckholds.

Natives were actually cleaner than europeans.

That is true.
The culture of taking shower every day came from our natives. Portugues didn't do such a thing.