Why aren't you socialist...

Why aren't you socialist? Do you trust more a multi-millionaire that wants solely to expand their fortune disregarding everyone else over a strong government elected to represent the needs of a population?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=vbLGG5UGEKw
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>coming from brazil
wew

>Do you trust more a multi-millionaire that wants solely to expand their fortune disregarding everyone else over a strong government elected to represent the needs of a population?
People are idiots. I unironically do.

One word: Nomenklatura.

Socialism is utophia.

>Do you trust more a multi-millionare that wants solely to expand their fortune disregarding everyone else over a strong future multi-millionare and 2-3 friends that wants solely to expand their fortune disregarding everyone else?

>government
>for the people

wew lad

Just accept that corporations and governments are both trying to fuck you over. At least corporations will give me a job and sell me nice things.

>do you trust more a multi millionaire who will try to expand their fortune by providing a service or manufacturing a good or do you trust the Bureaucrat who seeks only to expand his power with the help of the state

Something like this desu.

so you can't trust anyone?

The vast majority of people don't act altruistically.

This is why socialism is fundamentally and fatally flawed. It depends on a population where the majority of people are altruistic.

so if everyone was pro-society, socialism could work?

Because the left doesn't fight against multi-millionaires. The left fights for the west to be destroyed by Islamic extremists.

In a word, possibly; but you'd never find out because you could never get everybody to genuinely embrace altruism. It doesn't matter what political system you're looking at, the human element is always what brings it undone/turns it to shit.

>Why aren't you socialist?
I am.

Liberals are not left.

>but you'd never find out because you could never get everybody to genuinely embrace altruism
so you actually deny human potential people have to do good to others?

Because I'm not retarded and accept that humans can't be altruistic all the time

With regard to individual people, no; with regard to all people, yes. There'll always be corrupt, selfish cunts and there's nothing you can do to stop it.

Yes, socialism is just a dream

i'm a socialist, hell i'm a communist if my country is filled with a 2-5million of blond-haired, blue-eyed, non-degenerated whites like myself.

Otherwise, fuck you faggots. Not taking part is socialism with 250million negrso, capitalism ftw

for

That's half the problem.

1. You need a population where most people will work even though they aren't required to

2. You need a population that will only take enough from society to where everyone else can have a share

A magical population like this doesn't exist. You can FORCE people to work and you can FORCE people to only take a fair share, but that's when you get into communism and authoritarianism and no one wants to live in a system like that.

I don't give a shit tbqh
youtube.com/watch?v=vbLGG5UGEKw

>you could never get everybody to genuinely embrace altruism.
"Fuck the bosses" is not altruistic. Neither is labour owning the means of production. These are purely selfish motives.

>"Fuck the bosses" is not altruistic
Show me where I said that it is.