Is this good?
Is this good?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
yea
uh huh
mmm hmmm
why is he looking down?
yup
kino
guilt
looking at Foxx's dinger
No. It's really hard-going, heavy rather than weighty, and it was the beginning of that dog-ugly untreated digital aesthetic Mann has stuck with ever since, ending his significance as an artist. Everything he touches now looks like Tales from the Quadead Zone.
It has the despicably smug moment where Jamie Foxx pretends to have prematurely ejaculated, and his girlfriend begins to console him, before with a grin he reveals he was only funnin', and resumes the plow.
I thought it was really boring for the most part.
It's on that same level of ascended kino like works such as Batman v Superman and Knight of Cups are. It requires a sophisticated mind to unravel the work and appreciate it.
I'VE
BECOME SO
NUMB
NOOOOOOOO ALL THREE OF THOSE ARE A YAK'S BALLS
Gained a cult following in the Internet because some fucking idiot tricked people into liking shit films under the banner of 'Vulgar Auteurs'.
Pretty much a shit tier film,
I was bored to death. It's like HEAT without the fun and excitement.
I only watched one hour before turning it off but it felt like 3 hours
Don't fall for the fedoratippers
It's shit
I'VE BECOME SO NUMB
it's ok, give it a watch and then forget it immediately after
I CAN FEEL IT
COMING IN THE AIR TONIGHT
This made me spit out my drink you madman
it's great
don't mind the boomers, they're mad because there are no neon lights, synthpop, and overly-satured color schemes
muh 80s!
Some people praise Mann for his grainy shots, because they are aesthetic, but overall most people don't like it, including me.
Speak for yourself, nu-male
It's terrific. The cinematography was tremendous. Weak ending but the sheer brilliance of the filming method more than makes it up.
No.
There's literally no connection or relationship between farell and foxx's characters, only that they're partners.
>NO FUN ALLOWED - The Movie
I like it a lot