Katrina Pierson Insists That Unscientific Online Polls Are Accurate, Media Polls Are 'Skewed'
>On Tuesday, Donald Trump campaign spokeswoman Katrina Pierson took a page from her boss and touted Trump’s performance in post-debate online polls that have no scientific accuracy whatsoever.
After conservative talk show host Joe Pags told Pierson that “news organization polling” is tilted against Trump because media outlets “have some sort of vested interested in getting Hillary Clinton elected,” Pierson said that the scientific polls conducted by media firms are “skewed.”
As proof, she cited the fact that the CNN sampled more Democrats in its poll of debate viewers. Three other scientific polls also found that most people thought that Clinton won the debate.
Pierson vigorously defended the accuracy of voluntary, unscientific online polls: “When you look at the online polls, these are people who are, like I said, not engaged in the day-to-day, 24-hour news cycle, watching cable news all day every day, these are just people. If you’re looking at Time magazine, if you’re on another website and they’re doing a poll and you vote in that poll, by the way, to the tune of over a million votes in some of these polls, that’s important, because those aren’t the people who are in it one way or another, a lot of those people are just engaging.”
She is right you know, we don't actually know that much.
Wyatt Gutierrez
You know what I don't understand? Trump, and many other right-wing political figures are very pro-Israel. I've noticed this. Its obvious. Trump has literally stated numerous times during his rallies, "We love Israel".
But don't the Trump supporters on Cred Forums hate Israel? You guys go on and on about the suspicious Zionists. How do you reconcile with Trump's unabashed support of Israel's constant whining over the (non-existent threat of) being Holocaust'd again?
Owen King
I agree with her.I have seen media polls have sample sizes as low as 300, with higher percentages being democrat. In addition, the sample size being made up of "likely" voters.
The main concern is eradicating international theocratic fascism known as Islam, once that is done you can deal with internal problems, but I'm going to vote for whoever is tougher on mudlsime subhumans, Hillary is a Saudi funded plant.
Oh and by the way the polls are skewed, the statistical number of Dems:33 Repubs:29 and Independents:36 Is never ever the proportion in the media pools. They are completely skewed from the start.
Kevin Martin
Fucking this. All the "fact checking" sites are litearlly owned by jews and in the Clinton pockets.
The fucking CNN poll over polled democratics by 20% to have Clinton win. Fucking oy vey
Isaiah Gray
She's as retarded as Trump. She doesn't seem to know how easy it is to rig online polls using bots.
Jacob Green
it's all satire, Cred Forums is a board of peace
Cooper Smith
>media polls >scientific There is no science in oversampling democrats
Oliver Myers
A greater enemy has reared its head.
David Thompson
>OY vey, stupid goyim you can't trust online polls, only CNN polls are true